0
RESEARCH PAPERS

A Comparison Between Orifice and Flow Nozzle Laboratory Data and Published Coefficients

[+] Author and Article Information
R. W. Miller, O. Kneisel

The Foxboro Co., Foxboro, Mass.

J. Fluids Eng 96(2), 139-149 (Jun 01, 1974) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3447120 History: Received July 27, 1973; Online October 12, 2010

Abstract

Prediction of orifice and flow nozzle coefficients from their dimensions is a matter of major concern. In the mid 1930’s, laboratory flow coefficient data were obtained for flange top orifices and for the ASME flow nozzle. The working equations and tolerances developed from these data provide the basis for AGA Report Nos. (2,3), Fluid Meters, and ISO R541. Recent statistical evaluation of these data indicated that the tolerance should be at least twice the published values. This paper presents a considerable body of previously unpublished precision flow calibration data on orifices and flow nozzles. The significant difference between these data and the original 1980 data is that they were obtained on devices not constructed for a controlled laboratory test program. The majority of these devices were not manufactured by Foxboro but were purchased by the user from different manufacturers and were flow calibrated at Foxboro for high accuracy measurement applications. Data plate dimensions were used in all calculations, and conformity to ASME code requirements was the responsibility of the manufacturer. These data are compared point-by-point to the ASME and other proposed equations. These results indicate that a tolerance of ±0.7 percent for nozzles and ±0.5 percent or less for orifice plates is possible using a regression analysis equation. This compares to the ±2.0 percent and ±1 percent tolerance on previously published data. These data also point up the need for further work to bring the coefficient equations into line for pipe sizes less than 4 in. and for pipe sizes 24 in. and larger, as well as for beta ratios greater than 0.7.

Copyright © 1974 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In