0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Bubble Characteristics in a Developing Vertical Gas–Liquid Upflow Using a Conductivity Probe

[+] Author and Article Information
Junping Zhang, Norman Epstein, John R. Grace

Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2216 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4

Kokseng Lim

Fluidization Research Lab, CSIRO Minerals, Box 312, Clayton South, Victoria, 3169 Australia

J. Fluids Eng 122(1), 138-145 (Oct 12, 1999) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.483250 History: Received July 30, 1997; Revised October 12, 1999
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Rigby,  G. R., Van Blockland,  G. P., Park,  W. H., and Capes,  C. E., 1970, “Properties of Bubbles in Three Phase Fluidized Beds as Measured by an Electroresistivity Probe,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 25, pp. 1729–1741.
Tutsui,  T., and Miyauchi,  T., 1980, “Fluidity of a Fluidized Catalyst Bed and its Effect on the Behavior of the Bubbles,” Int. Chem. Eng., 20, pp. 386–393.
Ueyama,  K., Morooka,  S., Koide,  K., Kaji,  H., and Miyauchi,  T., 1980, “Behavior of Gas Bubbles in Bubble Columns,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 19, pp. 592–599.
Wittmann,  K., Helmrich,  H., and Schügerl,  K., 1981, “Measurements of Bubble Properties in Continuously Operated Fluidized Bed Reactors at Elevated Temperatures,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 36, pp. 1673–1677.
Lee,  S. L. P., and de Lasa,  H. I., 1988, “Radial Dispersion Model for Bubble Phenomena in Three-Phase Fluidized Beds,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 43, pp. 2445–2449.
Yu,  Y. H., and Kim,  S. D., 1988, “Bubble Characteristics in the Radial Direction of Three-Phase Fluidized Beds,” AIChE. J., 34, pp. 2069–2072.
Lee,  S. L. P., Soria,  A., and de Lasa,  H. I., 1990, “Evolution of Bubble Length Distributions in Three-Phase Fluidized Beds,” AIChE. J., 36, pp. 1763–1767.
Han,  J. H., and Kim,  S. D., 1993, “Bubble Chord Length Distribution in Three-Phase Fluidized Beds,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 48, pp. 1033–1039.
Park,  W. H., Kang,  W. K., Capes,  C. E., and Osberg,  G. L., 1969, “The Properties of Bubbles in Fluidized Beds of Conducting Particles as Measured by an Electroresistivity Probe,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 24, pp. 851–865.
Burgess,  J. M., Fane,  A. G., and Fell,  C. J. D., 1981, “Application of an Electroresistivity Probe Technique to a Two-Dimensional Fluidized Bed,” Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 59, pp. 249–252.
Matsuura,  A., and Fan,  L.-S., 1984, “Distribution of Bubble Properties in a Gas-Liquid-Solid Fluidized Bed,” AIChE. J., 30, pp. 894–903.
Choi,  J. M., Soh,  J. E., and Kim,  S. D., 1988, “Bubble Size and Frequency in Gas Fluidized Beds,” J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 21, pp.171–178.
Hewitt, G. F., 1978, Measurement of Two-Phase Flow Parameters, Academic, London.
Zhang, J.-P., 1996, “Bubble Columns and Three-Phase Fluidized Beds: Flow Regimes and Bubble Characteristics,” Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Werther,  J., 1974, “Bubbles in Gas Fluidized Bed–Part I,” Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 52, pp. 149–159.
Gunn,  D. J., and Al-Doori,  H. M., 1985, “The Measurement of Bubble Flows in Fluidized Beds by Electrical Probe,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 11, pp. 535–551.
Lim,  K. S., and Agarwal,  P. K., 1992, “Bubble Velocity in Fluidized Beds: the Effect of Non-Vertical Bubble Rise on its Measurement using Submersible Probes and its Relationship with Bubble Size,” Powder Technol., 69, pp. 239–248.
Griffith,  P., and Wallis,  G. B., 1961, “Two-Phase Slug Flow,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 83, pp. 307–320.
Wallis, G. B., 1969, One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hewitt, G. F., and Hall-Taylor, N. S., 1970, Annular Two-Phase Flow, Pergamon, New York.
Govier, G. W., and Aziz, K., 1972, The Flow of Complex Mixtures in Pipes, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Taitel,  Y., Barnea,  D., and Dukler,  A. E., 1980, “Modeling Flow Pattern Transitions for Steady Upward Gas-Liquid Flow in Vertical Tubes,” AIChE. J., 26, pp. 345–354.
Vince,  M. A., and Lahey,  R. T., 1982, “On the Development of an Objective Flow Regime Indicator,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 8, pp. 93–124.
Fernandes,  R. C., Semiat,  R., and Dukler,  A. E., 1983, “Hydrodynamic Model for Gas-Liquid Slug Flow in Vertical Tubes,” AIChE. J., 29, pp. 981–989.
Mao,  Z.-S., and Dukler,  A. E., 1989, “An Experimental Study of Gas-Liquid Slug Flow Experiments in Fluids,” Exp. Fluids, 8, pp. 169–182.
Franca,  F., Ackigoz,  M., Lahey,  R. T., and Clausse,  A., 1991, “The Use of Fractal Techniques for Flow Regime Identification,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 17, pp. 545–552.
Hasan,  A. R., and Kabir,  C. S., 1992, “Two-Phase Flow in Vertical and Inclined Annuli,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 18, pp. 279–293.
Zhang,  J.-P., Grace,  J. R., and Epstein,  N., 1997, “Flow Regime Identificationin Bubble Columns and Three-Phase Fluidized Beds,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 52, pp. 3979–3992.
Sanaullah, K., Zaidi, S. H., Altunbas, A., and Hills, J. H., 1998, “Bubbly Flow Measurements Using Resistivity Probes in Novel Configuration,” Proceedings 3rd International Conference On Multiphase Flow, Lyon, France, Paper No. 505, pp. 1–7.
Annunziato, M., and Girardi, G., 1985, “Statistical Methods to Identify Two-Phase Regimes: Experimental Results for Vertical Large Diameter Tubes,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Two-Phase Flow, London, U.K., British Hydromechanics Research Association (BHRA), Fluid Engineering Centre, Cranfield, Bedford, England, pp. 361–380.
Govier,  G. W., Radford,  B. A., and Dunn,  J. S. C., 1957, “The Upwards Vertical Flow of Air-Water Mixtures I. Effect of Air and Water Rates on Flow Pattern, Holdup and Pressure Drop,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 35, pp. 58–70.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of experimental apparatus and conductivity probe
Grahic Jump Location
Response of conductivity probe to a gas bubble in air-water system at Z=1.95 m,L=1.1 mm,Ul=0.018 m/s, and Ug=0.086 m/s (slug flow regime); estimate of uncertainty in voltage reading=±28 mV
Grahic Jump Location
Air–water bubble column flow regime map for D=0.0826 m and Z=0.65 m (points and solid lines, this study) compared to regime transitions from literature (broken lines); uncertainty estimate of Ug at transition points=±7percent, uncertainty estimate of Ul at transition points=±4percent (* ) transition from discrete bubble flow or slug flow to dispersed bubble flow; (▪) transition from discrete or dispersed bubble flow to coalesced bubble flow; (▵) transition from coalesced bubble flow to slug flow; (•) transition flow slug flow to churn flow; (▴) transition from churn flow to bridging flow; (▾) transition from bridging flow to annular flow; (1A) bubble slug flow transition, Annunziato and Girardi 30; (2A) slug/churn flow transition, Annunziato and Girardi 30; (3A) churn/annular flow transition, Annunziato and Girardi 30; (1G) bubble/slug flow transition, Govier et al. 31; (2G) slug/froth flow transition, Govier et al. 31; (3G) froth/ripple flow transition, Govier et al. 31; (4G) ripple/film flow transition, Govier et al. 31; (1T) bubble/slug flow transition, Taitel et al. 22; (2T) slug/churn flow transition, Taitel et al. 22; (3T) churn/annular flow transition, Taitel et al. 22
Grahic Jump Location
Linear relationship between bubble frequency and superficial gas velocity for the discrete (closed symbols) and dispersed (open symbols) bubble flow regimes: air–water system. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of f=±5 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Plot of local bubble frequency at axis of column versus superficial gas velocity showing variation of bubble frequency in slug flow and churn flow. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of f=±5 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of arith. avg. bubble chord length in discrete and dispersed bubble flow regimes for air–water system at Z=0.65 m. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of bubble chord length=±10 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Probability density distribution of bubble chord length in discrete and dispersed bubble flow regimes for air–water system. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of bubble chord length=±10 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Bubble chord length in coalesced bubble, slug and churn flow regimes for air–water system with Z=0.65 m and D=82.6 mm. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of bubble chord length=±10 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Probability density distribution of bubble chord length in the slug and churn flow regimes at Z=0.65 m and D=82.6 mm. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of bubble chord length=±10 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Average bubble velocity in discrete and dispersed flow at different superficial liquid velocities for air–water system at Z=0.65 m. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of bubble velocity and bubble chord length=±10 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between bubble travel length and average bubble chord length in the slug and churn flow regimes for air–water system at Z=0.65 m, D=82.6 mm, and Ug≈0.002–6 m/s. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of bubble velocity and bubble chord length=±10 percent.
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between average bubble velocity and average bubble chord length in slug and churn flow regimes for air–water system at Z=0.65 m and D=82.6 mm. Uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ug=±2 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of Ul=±1 percent; uncertainty estimate in measurement of bubble velocity and bubble chord length=±10 percent.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In