0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Use of k−ε−γ Model to Predict Intermittency in Turbulent Boundary-Layers

[+] Author and Article Information
Anupam Dewan

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati–781 031, Indiae-mail: adewan@iitg.ernet.in

Jaywant H. Arakeri

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore–560 012, Indiae-mail: jaywant@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in

J. Fluids Eng 122(3), 542-546 (Mar 27, 2000) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1287853 History: Received July 08, 1999; Revised March 27, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Predicted intermittency profiles for the flat plate boundary layer at Reθ=2600 compared with the measurements
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted turbulent kinetic energy profiles for the flat plate boundary-layer at Reθ=2600 compared with the measurements
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted Reynolds shear-stress profiles for thick axisymmetric boundary-layer (Rea=4800,δ/a=4.59) compared with the measurements
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted intermittency profile for thick axisymmetric boundary-layer (Rea=3200,δ/a=7.57) compared with the measurements
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted Reynolds shear-stress profiles for thick axisymmetric boundary-layer (Rea=3200,δ/a=7.57) compared with the measurements

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In