Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Influence of Geometry on Starting Vortex and Ejector Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Fei Zheng, Andrey V. Kuznetsov

Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering,  North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695

William L. Roberts1

Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering,  North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695

Daniel E. Paxson

 NASA Glenn Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135


Corresponding author.

J. Fluids Eng 133(5), 051204 (Jun 07, 2011) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004082 History: Received June 03, 2010; Revised April 18, 2011; Published June 07, 2011; Online June 07, 2011

For many propulsion devices, the thrust may be augmented considerably by adding a passive ejector, and these devices are especially attractive for unsteady propulsion systems such as pulse detonation engines and pulsejets. Starting vortices from these unsteady devices dominate the flowfield and control to a great extent the level of the thrust augmentation. Therefore, it is of fundamental interest to understand the geometric influences on the starting vortex and how these manifest themselves in augmenter/ejector performance. An unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes calculation was used to study the physics of a starting vortex generated at the exit of a pulsed jet and its interaction with an ejector. A 50 cm long pulsejet (typical hobby scale, allowing comparison with experimental data) with a circular exit was modeled as the resonant driving source and used to suggest an optimal ejector geometry and relative position. Computed limit-cycle thrust augmentation values compared favorably to experimentally obtained values for the same ejector geometries. Results suggest that the optimal diameter of the ejector is related to its relative position, dictated by the trajectory of the vortex toroid. The effect of the length of the ejector (which determines the natural frequency of the ejector, related to the acoustic processes occurring in the ejector) on overall performance was also investigated and shown to be less important than the ejector diameter.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Mass flow through the ejector

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Pulsejet and vortex generated by the jet

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Mesh generation for combined pulsejet and ejector simulations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Axial force on the outside surface of the ejector

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Geometrical parameters of the ejector

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Pressure distribution generated by the vortex ring. Upper picture shows pressure, lower picture shows vorticity.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

(a) Moving averages of chamber pressure and various thrust sources for the pulsejet with the base case ejector. (b) Instantaneous chamber pressure over several cycles.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

(a) Pressure downstream of the exit of the pulsejet and in the ejector. (b) Pressure downstream of the pulsejet exit. (c) Thrust on the ejector during one pulsejet cycle. Pictures in (a) corresponding to horizontal position in (c): A(5.16), B(5.2), C(5.22), D(5.24), E(5.26), F(5.28), G(5.4), H(5.52), I(5.6), J(5.72).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Solid line: trajectory of vortex ring core in absence of the ejector. Symbols: position of the leading edge of the ejector for the simulated cases.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Thrust augmentation as a function of D/d

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Thrust augmentation as a function of x/d

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Pressure oscillations in the ejector

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Thrust augmentation as a function of L/d



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In