0
ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL PAPERS

A Comparison of Data-Reduction Methods for a Seven-Hole Probe

[+] Author and Article Information
David Sumner

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A9 Canada

J. Fluids Eng 124(2), 523-527 (May 28, 2002) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1455033 History: Received May 22, 2000; Revised November 21, 2001; Online May 28, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gallington,  R. W., 1980, “Measurement of very large flow angles with non-nulling seven-hole probe,” Aeronautics Digest, USAFA-TR-80-17, pp. 60–88.
Gerner,  A. A., Maurer,  C. L., and Gallington,  R. W., 1984, “Non-nulling seven-hole probes for high-angle flow measurement,” Exp. Fluids, 2, pp. 95–103.
Zilliac,  G. G., 1993, “Modelling, calibration, and error analysis of seven-hole pressure probes,” Exp. Fluids, 14, pp. 104–120.
Gerner, A. A., and Maurer, C. L., 1982, “Calibration of seven-hole probes suitable for high angles in subsonic compressible flows,” AIAA Paper No. 82-0410.
Pettersson, B., 1987, “Calibration of seven-hole probes within Mach number range 0.50–1.30 in FFA high speed wind tunnel facility,” Proceedings of the International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 156–164.
Payne,  F. M., Ng,  T. T., and Nelson,  R. C., 1989, “Seven-hole probe measurement of leading edge vortex flows,” Exp. Fluids, 7, pp. 1–8.
Chow,  J. S., Zilliac,  G. G., and Bradshaw,  P., 1997, “Mean and turbulence measurements in the near field of a wingtip vortex,” AIAA J., 35, pp. 1561–1567.
Rediniotis,  O. K., Klute,  S. M., Hoang,  N. T., and Telionis,  D. P., 1994, “Dynamic pitch-up of a delta wing,” AIAA J., 32, pp. 716–725.
Cogotti, A., 1986, “Car-wake imaging using a seven-hole probe,” Aerodynamics: Recent Developments, SAE publication SP-656, pp. 1–25.
Yaras,  M. I., Sjolander,  S. A., and Kind,  R. J., 1992, “Effects of simulated rotation on tip leakage in a planar cascade of turbine blades: Part II-Downstream flow field and blade loading,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114, pp. 660–667.
Babu,  C. Venkateswara, Govardhan,  M., and Sitaram,  N., 1998, “A method of calibration of a seven-hole pressure probe for measuring highly three-dimensional flows,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 9, pp. 468–476.
Wenger,  C. W., and Devenport,  W. J., 1999, “Seven-hole pressure probe calibration method utilizing look-up error tables,” AIAA J., 37, pp. 675–679.
Rediniotis, O. K., Johansen, E. S., Tsao, T., Seifert, A. and Pack, L. G., 1999, “MEMS-based probes for velocity and pressure measurements in unsteady and turbulent flow fields,” AIAA Paper 99-0521, Proceedings of the 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Jan.
Johansen,  E. S., Rediniotis,  O. K., and Jones,  G., 2001, “The compressible calibration of miniature multi-hole probes,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, pp. 128–138.
Rediniotis,  O. K., and Chrysanthakopoulos,  G., 1998, “Application of neural networks and fuzzy logic to the calibration of the seven-hole probe,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 120, pp. 95–120.
Rediniotis,  O. K., and Vijayagopal,  R., 1999, “Miniature multihole pressure probes and their neural-network-based calibration,” AIAA J., 37, pp. 667–674.
Akima,  H., 1978, “A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 4, pp. 148–192.
Chue,  S. H., 1975, “Pressure probes for fluid measurement,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 16, pp. 147–223.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
(a) Flow angle nomenclature; (b) sectoring scheme, based on hole numbers 1 through 7
Grahic Jump Location
Measurement uncertainty, Re=3200: (a) pitch angle; (b) yaw angle. High flow angles: ▪, polynomial curve fit; □, direct interpolation. Low flow angles: ▴, polynomial curve fit; ▵, direct interpolation.
Grahic Jump Location
Measurement uncertainty, Re=3200: (a) total pressure; (b) dynamic pressure. High flow angles: ▪, polynomial curve fit; □, direct interpolation. Low flow angles: ▴, polynomial curve fit; ▵, direct interpolation.
Grahic Jump Location
Reynolds number sensitivity of the seven-hole probe. Calibration at Re=6500 with a 9.0 deg grid spacing. Pitch angle uncertainty (all sectors): ▪, polynomial curve fit; □, direct interpolation. Velocity magnitude uncertainty (all sectors): ▴, polynomial curve fit; ▵, direct interpolation.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In