0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Eulerian/Lagrangian Analysis for the Prediction of Cavitation Inception

[+] Author and Article Information
Kevin J. Farrell

Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, P.O. Box 30, State College, PA 16804

J. Fluids Eng 125(1), 46-52 (Jan 22, 2003) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1522411 History: Received January 22, 2001; Revised June 28, 2002; Online January 22, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schiebe headform in the ARL Penn State 30.48-cm diameter water tunnel with solution domain
Grahic Jump Location
Computed isobars for the Schiebe headform in the 30.48-cm diameter test section
Grahic Jump Location
Visual inception data from Meyer 37; ○ , unseeded runs; •, ▴: seeded runs; ▴, conditions simulated in Figs. 5 and 6
Grahic Jump Location
Measured nuclei spectra for 9.1, 12.2, 15.2, and 18.3 m/s from Meyer 37
Grahic Jump Location
Simulated nuclei trajectories over a 5.08-cm diameter Schiebe body at 9.1 m/s
Grahic Jump Location
Simulated cavitation event rates (nuclei spectra from Fig. 4) versus cavitation index compared to data of Meyer 37; open symbols: simulation results; solid symbols: visual cavitation calls with event rate derived from video analysis
Grahic Jump Location
Simulated cavitation event rates versus cavitation index compared to data and analysis of Liu and Brennen. Hatched area represents analytical event rate with various complications considered individually by Liu and Brennen 13.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In