0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Comparison of Semi-Empirical Correlations and a Navier-Stokes Method for the Overall Performance Assessment of Turbine Cascades

[+] Author and Article Information
C. Cravero, A. Satta

DIMSET–Università di Genova, via Montallegro n. 1, 16145 Genova, Italy

J. Fluids Eng 125(2), 308-314 (Mar 27, 2003) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1539869 History: Received July 24, 2000; Revised October 23, 2002; Online March 27, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Baljé,  O. E., and Binsley,  R. L., 1968, “Axial Turbine Performance Evaluation. Part A—Loss-Geometry Relationships,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 90, pp. 341–348.
Kacker,  S. C., and Okapuu,  U., 1982, “A Mean Line Prediction Method for Axial Flow Turbine Efficiency,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 104, pp. 111–119.
Chen, S., 1987, “A Loss Model for the Transonic Flow Low-Pressure Steam Turbine Blades,” IMechE Paper No. C269/87.
Qiang,  K. F., and Chen,  N. X., 1982, “New Correlations of the Two-Dimensional Turbine Cascade Aerodynamic Performance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 104, pp. 458–466.
Benvenuto, G., and Pittaluga, F., 1983, “Sul calcolo delle perdite di schiere di pale transoniche,” 38th Congresso ATI, Bari, Italy.
Dawes, W. N., 1983, “Computation of Viscous Compressible Flow in Blade Cascades Using an Implicit Iterative Replacement Algorithm,” TPRD/M/1377/N83.
Chima,  R. V., 1987, “Explicit Multigrid Algorithm for Quasi-Three-Dimensional Flow in Turbomachinery,” AIAA J. Propul. Power,3(5), pp. 397–405.
Arnone,  A., Liou,  M. S., and Povinelli,  L. A., 1992, “Navier-Stokes Solution of Transonic Cascade Flows Using Non-Periodic C-Type Grids,” AIAA J. Propul Power,8(2), pp. 410–417.
Islam, A. M. T., and Sjolander, S. A., 1999, “Deviation in Axial Turbines at Subsonic Conditions,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-026.
Croce, G., and Satta, A., 1996, “Calcolo numerico delle prestazioni termofluidodinamiche di schiere di pale di turbina,” Turbomacchine ’96, July 11–12, Genova.
Boyle,  R. J., 1991, “Navier-Stokes Analysis of Turbine Blade Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 113, pp. 392–403.
Ainley, D. G., and Mathieson, G. C. R., 1951, “A Method of Performance Estimation for Axial-Flow Turbines,” Aeronautical Research Council of Great Britain, Reports and Memoranda No. 2974.
Sato,  T., Aoki,  S., and Nagayama,  T., 1986, “Extensive Verification of the Denton New Scheme From the User’s Point of View; Part I–II,” ASME J. Turbomach., 108, pp. 162–179.
Davis,  R. L., Hobbs,  D. E., and Weingold,  H. D., 1988, “Prediction of Compressor Cascade Performance Using a Navier-Stokes Technique,” ASME J. Turbomach., 110, pp. 520–531.
Xu,  L., and Denton,  J. D., 1988, “The Base Pressure and Loss of a Family of Four Turbine Blades,” ASME J. Turbomach., 110, pp. 9–17.
Chiari, P., Cravero, C., and Satta, A., 1998, “Un codice di calcolo per l’integrazione delle equazioni di Navier-Stokes nelle schiere di pale bidimensionali delle turbomacchine,” IMSE Internal Report 3/98, University of Genova, Genova.
Cravero, C., and Satta, A., 1995, “Three-Dimensional Numerical Solutions of Turbomachinery Annular Cascade Flow,” ASME Cogen Turbo Power, Vienna, Austria, Aug.
Cravero, C., and Satta, A., 1995, “An Algorithm for the Numerical Computation of Convective Fluxes in a Finite Volume Method for Complex Configurations,” Fluid Machinery Forum, ASME Summer Meeting, Hilton Head, Aug.
Cravero, C., 1997, “Generazione di magliature ortogonali al contorno tramite l’integrazione di equazioni biarmoniche,” 15th UIT National Heat Transfer Conference, June 19–20, Torino.
Fottner, L., 1990, “Test Cases for Computation of Internal Flows in Aero Engine Components,” AGARD Propulsion and Energetics Panel, AGARD AR 275.
Baldwin, B. S., and Lomax, H., 1978, “Thin Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows,” AIAA Paper No. 78-257.
Kays, W. M., and Moffat, R. J., 1975, “The Behavior of Transpired Boundary Layers,” Studies in Convection, Vol. 1: Theory, Measurement, and Application, B. E. Launder ed., Academic Press, London.
Cebeci, T., and Smith, A. O. M., 1974, Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layers, Academic Press, New York.
Hoheisel,  H., Kiock,  R., Lichtfuss,  H. J., and Fottner,  L., 1987, “Influence of Free-Stream Turbulence and Blade Pressure Gradient on Boundary Layer and Loss Behavior of Turbine Cascades,” ASME J. Turbomach., 109, pp. 210–219.
Hildebrandt,  T., and Fottner,  L., 1999, “A Numerical Study of the Influence of Grid Refinement and Turbulence Modeling on the Flow Field Inside a Highly Loaded Turbine Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121, pp. 709–716.
Cravero, C., and Perelli, L., 2001, “Aerodynamic Performance Prediction of Gas Turbine Cascades Using a k-ω Turbulence Closure,” ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 2001, Sept. 4–7, Swansea.
Mayle,  E., 1991, “The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 113, pp. 509–537.
De Palma, P., 2001, “Accurate Numerical Simulation of Compressible Turbulent Flows in Turbomachinery,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-2926.
Mee,  D. J., Baines,  N. C., Oldfield,  M. L. G., and Dickens,  T. E., 1992, “An Examination of the Contributions to Loss on a Transonic Turbine Blade in Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114, pp. 155–162.
Sieverding, C., 1976, “Transonic Flows in Axial Turbomachinery,” VKI-LS 84, Rhode Saint Genese, Belgium.
Arts,  T., and Lambert de Rouvroit,  M., 1992, “Aero-Thermal Performance for a Two-Dimensional Highly Loaded Transonic Turbine Nozzle Guide Vane: A Test Case for Inviscid and Viscous Flow Computations,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114, pp. 147–154.
Denton, J. D., 1993, “Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-435.
Knight,  C. J., and Choi,  D., 1989, “Development of a Viscous Cascade Code Based on Scalar Implicit Factorization,” AIAA J., 27(5), pp. 581–594.
Stock,  H. W., and Haase,  W., 1989, “Determination of Length Scales in Algebraic Turbulence Models for Navier-Stokes Methods,” AIAA J., 27(1), pp. 5–14.
Boyle,  R. J., and Ameri,  A. A., 1997, “Grid Orthogonality Effects on Predicted Turbine Midspan Heat Transfer and Performance,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119, pp. 31–38.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Blade profile ECA6—boundary layer velocity profiles at x/C=0.85 with different grid densities. Tu=0.8 percent (uncertainty for V≤5 percent).
Grahic Jump Location
Blade profile ECA6—boundary layer velocity profiles at x/C=0.65 (uncertainty for V≤5 percent)
Grahic Jump Location
Blade profile ECA6—boundary layer velocity profiles at x/C=0.75 (uncertainty for V≤5 percent)
Grahic Jump Location
Boundary orthogonal grid–ECA6 cascade; 121×95 grid points
Grahic Jump Location
Blade profile ECA6—pressure coefficient distributions along the blade with different grid densities. Comparison with experimental values Tu=7.0 percent (uncertainty for Cp=±0.005).
Grahic Jump Location
Blade profile ECA6—boundary layer velocity profiles at x/C=0.85 (uncertainty for V≤5 percent)
Grahic Jump Location
Computed versus experimental wake profile at x/Cax=1.40.Tu=5.0 percent (uncertainty for Y=±0.001)
Grahic Jump Location
Different turbine blade sections

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In