Analysis of Thin Film Flows Using a Flux Vector Splitting

[+] Author and Article Information
J. Rafael Pacheco

Departamento de Ingenieriá Mecánica, Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NJ 64849, México e-mail: rpacheco@asu.edu

Arturo Pacheco-Vega

Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556

J. Fluids Eng 125(2), 365-374 (Mar 27, 2003) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1538626 History: Received December 15, 1999; Revised October 11, 2002; Online March 27, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


MacCormack, R. W., 1969, “The Effect of Viscosity in Hypervelocity Impact Craterings,” AIAA Paper No. 69-354.
Beam,  R. M., and Warming,  R. F., 1976, “An Implicit Finite-Difference Algorithm for Hyperbolic Systems in Conservation Law Form,” Comput. Phys., 22, pp. 87–110.
Yee, H. C., 1989, “A Class of High-Resolution Explicit and Implicit Shock-Capturing Methods,” technical report, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Roe,  P. L., 1981, “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes,” Comput. Phys., 43, pp. 357–372.
Yee,  H. C., and Harten,  A., 1987, “Implicit TVD Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation-Laws in Curvilinear Coordinates,” AIAA J., 25, pp. 266–274.
Steger, J. L., and Warming, R. F., 1979, “Flux Vector Splitting of the Inviscid Gasdynamic Equation With Application to Finite Difference Methods,” technical report, NASA TM-78605.
Van Leer, B., 1982, “Flux-Vector Splitting for the Euler Equations,” Krause E., editor, Lecture, Notes in Physics, E. Krause, ed., Springer, Berlin, 170 , pp. 507–512.
Walters, R. W., Thomas, J. L., and Van Leer, B., 1986, “An Implicit Flux-Split Algorithm for the Compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations,” Lecture Notes in Physics, F. G. Zhuang and Y. L. Zhu, eds., Springer, Berlin, 264 , pp. 628–635.
Glaister,  P., 1988, “Approximate Riemann Solutions of the Shallow Water Equations,” J. Hydraulic Res., 26, pp. 293–306.
Glaister,  P., 1993, “Flux Difference Splitting for Open-Channel Flows,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 16, pp. 629–654.
Alcrudo,  F., and Garcia-Navarro,  P., 1993, “A High-Resolution Godunov-Type Scheme in Finite Volumes for the 2D Shallow-Water Equations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 16, pp. 489–505.
Chapman,  R. S., and Kuo,  C. Y., 1985, “Application of the Two-Equation κ-ε Turbulence Model to a Two-Dimensional, Steady, Free Surface Flow Problem With Separation,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 5, pp. 257–268.
Vreugdenhill, C. B., 1993, Numerical Methods for Shallow-Water Flows, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Cunge, J., 1975, “Rapidly Varying Flow in Power and Pumping Canals,” Unsteady flow in open channels, K. Mahmood and V. Yevjevich, eds., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO, pp. 539–586.
Thomas, J. L., and Walters, R. W., 1985, “Upwind Relaxation Algorithms for the Navier-Stokes Equations,” AIAA Paper No. 85–1501.
Hirsch, C., 1990, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Stoker, J. J., 1957, Water Waves, Wiley Interscience, New York,
Sadler, C. D., and Higgins, M. S., 1963, “Radial Free Surfaces Flows,” master’s thesis, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Younus,  M., and Chaudhry,  M. H., 1994, “A Depth-Averaged κ-ε Turbulence Model for the Computation of Free Surface Flow,” J. Hydraul Res., 32(3), pp. 415–444.
Hunt, J. C. R., Pacheco, J. R., Mahalov, A., and Fernando, H. J. S., 2003, “Effects of Rotation and Sloping Terrain on Fronts of Density Currents,” J. Fluid Mech., (submitted).
Ahmad, D., 1967, “Circular Hydraulic Jump,” master’s thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collings, CO.


Grahic Jump Location
Water depth of the dam-break problem in a rectangular channel at time t=0.10 second and 440 grid points. (a) Exact solution; –⋄– first-order scheme. (b) Exact solution; –○– second-order scheme. (c) Exact solution; –▿– scheme based on flux extrapolation E⁁ with limiter. (d) Exact solution; –▵– scheme based on variable extrapolation Q⁁ (MUSCL) with limiter.
Grahic Jump Location
Maximum relative error of h as a function of mesh refinement for the dam-break problem on a rectangular channel at time t=0.10 s at the points of discontinuity
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the experiment layout of Sadler and Higgins 18
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of numerical solutions and experiments for Qw=0.0098 m3/s (0.345 cfs); -▿- (121×121) grid points; -○- (241×121) grid points; ⋄ Sadler and Higgins 18
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the experiment layout of Ahmad 21
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of water surface profile of a hydraulic jump for Qw=0.0170 m3/s (0.60 cfs) between experiments and numerical solutions for different number of grid points: –▵– (121×121) grid mesh; –○– (241×121) grid mesh; ⋄ observed by Ahmad 21
Grahic Jump Location
Evolution of the eigenvalues and appearance of the hydraulic jump; –○– λ3; –▹– γ3; – height h. FVS with slope limiter solution; (241×121) grid points.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In