0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

The Spatial Stability of Natural Convection Flow on Inclined Plates

[+] Author and Article Information
Anatoli Tumin

Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721e-mail: tumin@engr.Arizona.edu

J. Fluids Eng 125(3), 428-437 (Jun 09, 2003) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1566047 History: Received November 02, 2001; Revised November 26, 2002; Online June 09, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the flow and the coordinate system
Grahic Jump Location
Eigenvalue map (Rx=100, θ=5°, ω=0.1, γδx=0): ×, ▵ – collocation method; ○ – Runge-Kutta method. Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Profiles of streamwise velocity and temperature disturbances (parameters are the same as in Fig. 2
Grahic Jump Location
Eigenvalue map (Rx tan θ=24.26, ω=0, γδx=1.292) showing the quasi-parallel approximation (×). Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Eigenvalue map (Rx tan θ=24.26, ω=0, γδx=1.292): × – quasi-parallel approximation; ○ – local nonparallel model
Grahic Jump Location
Velocity disturbance profiles, v and w, of the neutral vortex mode (Rx tan θ=24.26, ω=0, γδx=1.292). Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Eigenvalue maps (ω=0, γδx=1.292). Quasi-parallel approximation. Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Velocity disturbance profiles, v and w, of the second unstable vortex mode (Rx tan θ=242.6, ω=0, γδx=1.292). Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Neutral curves for the traveling mode, γ=0. Solid symbols (P)–quasi-parallel approximation; open symbols (NP)–nonparallel flow theory. Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Growth rates for the traveling modes: (a) θ=0°; (b) θ=12°. Solid symbols–quasi-parallel approximation; open symbols–nonparallel flow theory. Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of growth rates for different models of the steady vortex mode (Rx tan θ=24.26, ω=0, γδx=1.292): □ – quasi-parallel; ⋄ – local nonparallel; • – perturbation method (term No. 1 in Eq. (29) only); ○ – conventional nonparallel theory (both terms in Eq. (29)). Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of spanwise wave number and Reynolds number on the growth rate of the vortex instability mode: (a) Rx tan θ=60; (b) Rx tan θ=120. □ – quasi-parallel; ⋄ – local nonparallel; • – perturbation method (term No. 1 in Eq. (22) only); ○ – conventional nonparallel theory (both terms in Eq. (22)). Pr=6.7.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of the disturbance velocity profiles at ξ0=0.22 used in two runs (RL tan θ=145,γδL=1.5): + – 1st run; × – 2nd run. Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of initial data on umax(RL tan θ=145,γδL=1.5): + – 1st run; × – 2nd run. Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of growth rates (RL tan θ=145,γδL=1.5): × – quasi-parallel approximation; + – nonparallel normal mode consideration; ○ – marching method (run 1). Pr=5.5.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of growth rates at ξ=1. RL tan θ=145, Pr=5.5: × – quasi-parallel approximation; ○ – marching method (run 1).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In