0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Experiments and Modeling in Bubbly Flows at Elevated Pressures

[+] Author and Article Information
Ranganathan Kumar

Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816

Thomas A. Trabold

Géneral Motors Corporation, Honeoye Falls, NY 14612

Charles C. Maneri

Lockheed Martin Corporation, One River Road, Schenectady, NY 12301

J. Fluids Eng 125(3), 469-478 (Jun 09, 2003) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1567308 History: Received December 05, 2001; Revised November 13, 2002; Online June 09, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the front view of the test section. Thickness dimension is perpendicular to the paper.
Grahic Jump Location
Bubble frequency at α=0.5 for different flow rates and pressure using the hot film anemometer
Grahic Jump Location
Photograph of bubbly flow at α=0.25;w=532 kg/hr;P=1.4 MPa. The snapshot captures the entire width of the test section.
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between liquid subcooling and bubble departure diameter measured from photographs
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between local void fraction and local bubble diameter measured using the hot film anemometer
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between bubble diameter and rise velocity measured using the hot film anemometer and a high-speed video camera
Grahic Jump Location
Local void fraction distribution using the hot film anemometer at two axial locations compared with line-averaged void fraction from the gamma densitometer for Case 1 in Table 1. Cross-section averages from the GDS are provided in the inset.
Grahic Jump Location
Local void fraction distribution using the hot film anemometer at two axial locations compared with line-averaged void fraction from the gamma densitometer for Case 2 in Table 1. Cross-section averages from the GDS are provided in the inset.
Grahic Jump Location
Local void fraction distribution using the hot film anemometer at two axial locations for Case 3 in Table 1. Cross-section averages from the GDS are provided in the inset.
Grahic Jump Location
Local void fraction distribution using the hot film anemometer at two axial locations for Case 4 in Table 1. Cross-section averages from the GDS are provided in the inset.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In