Flow Separation Within the Engine Inlet of an Uninhabited Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV)

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael J. Brear

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australiae-mail: mjbrear@unimelb.edu.au

Zachary Warfield

Structures and Configuration Group, Mechanical Engineering Section, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

John F. Mangus, Jeffry S. Philhower

Integrated Systems, Northrop Grumman Corporation

Steve Braddom

Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering, West Point

James D. Paduano

Gas Turbine Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

J. Fluids Eng 126(2), 266-272 (May 03, 2004) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1667885 History: Received March 17, 2003; Revised October 06, 2003; Online May 03, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Seddon, J., and Goldsmith, E. L., 1999, “Intake aerodynamics,” 2nd edition, AIAA education series, AIAA.
Anderson, B. H., Miller, D. N., Yagle, P. J., and Truax, P. P., 1999, “A study of MEMS flow control for the management of engine face distortion in compact inlet systems,” Proc. 3rd ASME/JSME Conference, San Francisco, ASME paper no. FEDSM99-6920.
Ng, W., and Burdisso, R. A., 2001, “Active acoustic and flow control for aeropropulsion,” 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, AIAA paper no. AIAA 2001-0220.
SAE Committee S-16, 1977, “ARP 1420-Gas turbine engine inlet flow distortion guidelines.”
Warfield, Z., 2001, “Active control of separation induced distortion in a scaled tactical aircraft inlet,” M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Schlichting, H., 1979, “Boundary layer theory,” McGraw-Hill, New York.
Abbott, I. H., and von Doenhoff, A. E., 1959, “Theory of wing sections,” Dover, New York.
Perry,  A. E., and Chong,  M. S., 1986, “A series expansion study of the Navier-Stokes equations with applications to three-dimensional separation patterns,” J. Fluid Mech., 173, pp. 207–223.
Horton, H. P., 1969, “A semi-empirial theory for the growth and bursting of laminar separation bubbles,” ARC current papers, no. 1073.
Gad-el-Hak,  M., 1990, “Control of low speed aerodynamics,” AIAA J., 28, no. 9, pp. 1537–1552.
Lubcke,  H., Schmidt,  St., Rung,  T., and Thiele,  F., 2001, “Comparison of LES and RANS in bluff-body flows,” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 89, pp. 1471–1485.
Brear,  M. J., Hodson,  H. P., and Harvey,  N. W., 2002, “Pressure surface separations in low pressure turbines-part 2: interactions with the secondary flow,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124, pp. 402–409.
Brear, M. J., 2000, “Pressure surface separations in low pressure turbines,” Ph.D dissertation, Cambridge University.
Brear,  M. J., Hodson,  H. P., and Harvey,  N. W., 2002, “Pressure surface separations in low pressure turbines-part 1: midspan results,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124, pp. 393–401.
Castro,  I. P., and Epik,  E., 1998, “Boundary layer development after a separated region,” J. Fluid Mech., 374, pp. 91–116.
Braddom, S., 2002, “Design and Characterization of Robust Hot Film Sensors for Tactical Aircraft Inlets,” M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Grahic Jump Location
Predicted a) secondary flow vectors and b) contours of Pt/P (see Fig. 3 for scale) at the AIP
Grahic Jump Location
Computed inlet flow showing contours of Pt/P at fixed axial locations (see Fig. 8 for scale) and Ps/P on the inlet surface
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted static pressure along the top surface of the inlet
Grahic Jump Location
Experimental surface flow visualisation showing a) the bottom and b) the top surfaces of the inlet and c) the top surface’s separated region with inferred flow topology (lines) and the location of the hot-film sensor (white cross)
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted contours of a) Mach number and b) Pt/P along the center-plane of the inlet
Grahic Jump Location
Cross-section of experimental rig
Grahic Jump Location
Measured and predicted πd as a function of the scaled inlet massflow
Grahic Jump Location
Contours of Pt/P at the AIP from experiment for a) low massflow rate (2.9 lb/s) and b) design massflow rate (3.6 lb/s), showing the location of the unsteady, stagnation pressure probes 1 and 2
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted velocity vectors and inferred flow topology a) along the inlet center-plane and b) near the top surface of the inlet
Grahic Jump Location
An “owl-face of the first kind” 8
Grahic Jump Location
Cross correlations at design massflow rate between a) the unsteady stagnation pressure probe 1 at the AIP in Fig. 3b and the hot-film sensor located at X in Fig. 7 and b) the two unsteady stagnation pressure probes at the AIP in Fig. 3b



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In