Werlé–Legendre Separation in a Hydraulic Machine Draft Tube

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Mauri, J. L. Kueny, F. Avellan

LMH—Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines, EPFL—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Av. Cour 33bis, Lausanne 1007, Switzerland

J. Fluids Eng 126(6), 976-980 (Mar 11, 2005) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1839930 History: Received October 30, 2002; Revised February 25, 2004; Online March 11, 2005
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Tobak,  M., and Peake,  D. J., 1982, “Topology of Three-Dimensional Separated Flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 14, pp. 61–85.
Hornung,  H., and Perry,  A. E., 1984, “Some Aspects of Three-Dimensional Separation, Part I: Streamsurface Bifurcations,” Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforsch., 8, Heft 2, pp. 77–87.
Délery,  J. M., 2001, “Toward the Elucidation of Three-Dimensional Separation,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 33, pp. 129–54.
Ciocan, G. D., Kueny, J.-L., and Avellan, F., 2000, “Optical Measurement Techniques for Experimental Analysis of Hydraulic Turbines Rotor-Stator Interaction,” Proceedings of 2000 ASME Fluids Engineering Conference, Boston, June 11–15.
Raw, M. J., Galpin, P. F., and Hutchinson, B. R., 1989, “A Colocated Finite Volume Method for Solving the Navier-Stokes Equations for Incompressible and Compressible Flows in Turbomachinery: Results and Applications,” Proceedings Thirty-Sixth Annual General Meeting Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute, Ottawa Ontario, III.
AEA Technology Engineering Software Limited, 2000, “CFX-TAS Cflow Theory Documentation Version 2.10,” Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 5Z4.
Mauri, S., Kueny, J.-L., and Avellan, F., 2000, “Numerical Prediction of the Flow in a Turbine Draft Tube—Influence of the Boundary Conditions,” Proceedings of 2000 ASME Fluids Engineering Conference, Boston, June 11–15.
Mauri, S., 2002, “Numerical Simulation and Flow Analysis of an Elbow Diffuser,” Ph.D. thesis EPFL N°2527, Lausanne, http://lmhwww.epfl.ch/Publications/Theses/Mauri/MauriPhD.html
Mauri, S., Kueny, J.-L., and Avellan, F., “Flow Simulation in an Elbow Diffuser: Verification and Validation,” Proceedings of the 21st IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, 9–12 September, 2002, pp. 231–240.
Roache,  P. J., 1997, “Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 29, pp. 123–160.


Grahic Jump Location
Investigated geometry. Cross area evolution. Sections definition.
Grahic Jump Location
Measured velocity and kinetic energy inlet profiles (filled points correspond to the external radius). Ca: Axial velocity component, Ct: Circumferential velocity component, Cr: Radial velocity component, k: Turbulent kinetic energy, C0: Mean sectional velocity magnitude. Machine and draft tube efficiency with the main operating points.
Grahic Jump Location
Static pressure recovery. Comparison measurement-computation. The GCI is reported for φ* =0.994.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison measurements (M)-computation (C) at the draft tube outlet. Normal (Cn) and vertical (Cv) velocity components, C0: mean sectional velocity magnitude. φ* =0.919 and φ* =1.108. The measurements do not cover the whole channels’ surface.
Grahic Jump Location
Computed local mean specific static pressure coefficient. The recovery occurring in the cone (s1-s2), first half of the bend (s2-s7), second half of the bend (s7-s17) and diffuser (s17-s21) and in the left- and right-side of the draft tube are distinguished.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted flow rate percentage in the left channel over the operating range
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted separation lines and flow direction in the right channel before (φ* =0.994) and after (φ* =1.021) the efficiency drop
Grahic Jump Location
Computed skin friction lines, onset on the surface of a focus in company with a saddle point. Before the efficiency drop: φ* =0.994, φ* =1.014, after: φ* =1.021, φ* =1.032, φ* =1.038, φ* =1.054.
Grahic Jump Location
Computed vortex core and separation line, φ* =1.021
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted vortex evolution. Before the drop: φ* =1.014, after: φ* =1.021, φ* =1.027, φ* =1.032, φ* =1.038. The last picture summarizes the first four operating conditions (lighter core: φ* =1.014, darker core: φ* =1.032).
Grahic Jump Location
Interpretation of Fig. 8. S: Saddle, F: Focus, N: Node.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In