0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Surfactant Use for Slug Flow Pattern Suppression and New Flow Pattern Types in a Horizontal Pipe

[+] Author and Article Information
R. J. Wilkens, D. K. Thomas, S. R. Glassmeyer

 University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-0246

J. Fluids Eng 128(1), 164-169 (Jul 12, 2005) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2062747 History: Received June 25, 2004; Revised July 12, 2005

A set of experiments was performed to study flow pattern suppression in horizontal air-water pipe flow by means of surfactant additive. Results suggest that addition of the surfactant to the gas-liquid flow significantly reduces the occurrence of slug flow. In addition, previously unreported flow patterns were observed to exist between slug and dispersed bubble flows. It is concluded that new mechanisms for slug flow transition need to be considered.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Common gas-liquid horizontal flow patterns: (a) stratified smooth, (b) stratified wavy, (c) intermittent plug, (d) intermittent slug, (e) pseudoslug, (f) annular, (g) dispersed bubble, (h) mist.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

University of Dayton multiphase flow loop

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

New flow patterns: (a) stratified wavy with bubbles, (b) intermittent bubble top plug, (c) intermittent bubble top slug, (d) stratified bubble-liquid, (e) stratified gas-bubble-liquid, (f) intermittent bubbly slug

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Experimental flow pattern map for air/water (surface tension=72mN∕m). Shaded lines are the flow pattern map as observed in the literature (8). The data shows good agreement with expected behavior.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Flow pattern map for air/220ppm SDS in 0gpg water (surface tension=64mN∕m). Note that the intermittent slug pattern has been significantly suppressed in favor of intermittent bubbly slug pattern, especially at high superficial velocities.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Flow pattern map for air/1340ppm SDS in 0gpg water (surface tension=48mN∕m). Note that the intermittent slug pattern has been almost completely suppressed in favor of intermittent bubbly slug pattern.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Flow pattern map for air/1140ppm SDS in 10gpg water (surface tension=30mN∕m). Note that the intermittent slug flow pattern has been totally suppressed. Comparing this to Fig. 6 shows that surfactant addition is even more effective in suppression of slug flow pattern when the water is hard than when the water is deionized.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Flow pattern map for air/1375ppm LAS in 10gpg water (surface tension=30mN∕m). Surface tension alone does not establish the flow pattern map.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In