0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Impact and Dispersion of Liquid Filled Cylinders

[+] Author and Article Information
John Borg

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, 1515 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53233

Susan Bartyczak

Center-Dahlgren Division, Naval Surface Warfare, Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100

Nancy Swanson

 Abacus Enterprises, 2582 Island View Ln., Lummi Island, WA 98262

John R. Cogar

 CORVID Technologies, 149 Plantation Ridge Dr., Suite 170, Mooresville, NC 28117

J. Fluids Eng 128(6), 1295-1307 (Apr 07, 2006) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2353270 History: Received April 04, 2005; Revised April 07, 2006

The computational and experimental results of impact loading a thin wall liquid filled cylindrical target within a vacuum chamber are presented. The impact velocity ranges from 2.2 to 4.2kms. Both experimental and computational results are presented. It will be shown that impact dynamics and the early time fluid expansion are well modeled and understood. This includes the mass distribution and resulting expansion velocity. However, the late time dynamics, which includes the liquid breakup and droplet formation process of impacted liquid filled cylinders, is not well understood.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

(a) Target filled with 550ml of TBP and (b) schematic of gauge locations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Two stage gas gun facility at University of Alabama’s Aero Research Laboratory

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic of the target tank illustrating the location of the data acquisition equipment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Projectile and target orientation illustrating coordinate system for the impact point listed in Table 3. (a) Axial projectile target orientation. (b)90deg end down projectile target orientation.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Shot line view demonstrating radially symmetric fluid expansion, test #40; (a) time ≈70μs, (b) time ≈200μs, and (c) time ≈305μs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Downrange view, projectile moving right to left, test #40; (a) time ≈70μs, (b) time ≈200μs, and (c) time ≈305μs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

X-ray images of target response as compared to CTH calculations. (a) test #22, t=12.2μs, (b) test #42, t=68μs, and (c) test #43, t=116μs.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Post impact x-rays illustrating dimensional variable nomenclature for test # 21 (a) Top view, t=57.6μs; (b) Side view, t=61.8μs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Early time dimensionless parameterization for all the experimental test as compared to CTH calculations. (a) Dimensionless location of maximum expansion diameter. (b) Dimensionless radial expansion.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Experimental and computational pressure traces, test #29; (a) long gauge and (b) short gauge

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Experimental and computational pressure traces with an Arrhenius Reactive Burn model: Long gauge test #29

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Eight consecutive images of the fluid shell taken from above the slit plate for test #24. The fluid is traveling from the bottom of the frame to the top.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Results of four test shots each represents different phenomenology for different fluid properties given identical initial conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Measured fluid thickness as seen in Fig. 1, test #27

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Computational simulation of fluid passing through slit plate. The effect of the slit plate on the fluid, specifically an increase in apparent fluid thickness, is calculated for test #27.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Late time average fluid velocity after passing through slit plate; (a) axial velocity distribution and (b) Average expansion velocity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Post impact debris. In each image, the target debris is presented on the left and the projectile debris is presented on the right. (a) Test #22, Impact velocity 2.2km∕s. (b) Test #29, Impact velocity 4.1km∕s.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In