0
Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

Flow Regime Identification Under Adiabatic Upward Two-Phase Flow in a Vertical Rod Bundle Geometry

[+] Author and Article Information
Sidharth Paranjape, Shao-Wen Chen, Takashi Hibiki

Mamoru Ishii1

School of Nuclear Engineering,  Purdue University, 400 Central Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2017ishii@purdue.edu

1

Corresponding author.

J. Fluids Eng 133(9), 091302 (Sep 12, 2011) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004836 History: Received February 10, 2011; Accepted August 07, 2011; Published September 12, 2011; Online September 12, 2011

Flow regime maps were obtained for adiabatic air-water two-phase flow through a flow channel with 8 × 8 rod bundle, which simulated a typical rod bundle in a boiling water reactor. Impedance void meters were used to measure the area averaged void fraction at various axial locations in the flow channel. The Cumulative Probability Distribution Functions of the signals from the impedance meters were utilized along with self organizing neural network methodology to identify the flow regimes. The flow regimes were identified at five axial locations in the channel in order to understand the development of the flow regimes in axial direction. The experimental flow regime transition boundaries for bubbly to cap-bubbly and part of the cap-turbulent to churn-turbulent agreed with the theoretical boundaries of bubbly to slug and slug to churn-turbulent in round pipes. In addition, the two impedance void meters located across a spacer grid, revealed the nature of change in the flow regime across the spacer grid.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the experimental test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Cross-sectional view of the rod bundle test section at a measurement port

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic diagram of air-water mixture injection

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Present test matrix and theoretical/experimental transition boundaries obtained for round pipes [9] and large diameter pipes (102 mm and 152 mm ID) [10]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Schematic figures of flow regime identification process

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Flow visualization in various flow regimes at z/DH  = 140

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Drift-flux plot and empirical correlation for the present data in rod bundle geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Comparison of rod bundle flow regime map at z/DH  = 200 with Mishima-Ishii’s theoretical flow regime map for round pipes [9]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of rod bundle flow regime map at z/DH  = 200 with Smith’s experimental flow regime map for large diameter pipes [10]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Experimental flow regime maps across the spacer grid at z/DH  = 121, with upstream port at z/DH  = 116 and downstream port at z/DH  = 124

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Flow regime transition boundaries at various axial locations

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In