Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Pressure Drop for Fully Developed Turbulent Flow in Circular and Noncircular Ducts

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhipeng Duan

M. M. Yovanovich

Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering,  University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada

Y. S. Muzychka

Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,  Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, A1B 3X5, Canada

J. Fluids Eng 134(6), 061201 (Jun 11, 2012) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4006861 History: Received January 24, 2011; Revised April 18, 2012; Published June 11, 2012; Online June 11, 2012

The objective of this paper is to furnish the engineer with a simple and convenient means of estimating frictional pressure drop in ducts and the original physical behavior can be clearly reflected. Fully developed turbulent flow frictional pressure drop in noncircular ducts is examined. Simple models are proposed to predict the frictional pressure drop in smooth and rough noncircular channels. Through the selection of a novel characteristic length scale, the square root of the cross-sectional area, the effect of duct shape has been minimized. The proposed models have an accuracy of 6% for most common duct shapes of engineering practice and can be used to predict pressure drop of fully developed turbulent flow in noncircular ducts. It is found that the hydraulic diameter is not the appropriate length scale to use in defining the Reynolds number to ensure similarity between the circular and noncircular ducts. By using the Reynolds number based on the square root of the cross-sectional area, it is demonstrated that the circular tube relations may be applied to noncircular ducts eliminating large errors in estimation of pressure drop. The square root of the cross-sectional area is an appropriate characteristic dimension applicable to most duct geometries. The dimensionless mean wall shear stress is a desirable dimensionless parameter to describe fluid flow physical behavior so that fluid flow problems can be solved in the simple and direct manner. The dimensionless mean wall shear stress is presented graphically and appears more general and reasonable to reflect the fluid flow physical behavior than the traditional Moody diagram.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

fReDh comparison for experimental data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Friction factor Reynolds number product for turbulent flow valid for circular and most common noncircular ducts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Fully developed fReDh for noncircular ducts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Fully developed fReA for noncircular ducts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Trapezoidal and double-trapezoidal ducts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Modified Blasius and PKN models for smooth pipes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison with experimental data based on hydraulic diameter

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Comparison with experimental data based on square root of area

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Modified Blasius model based on A for noncircular ducts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

fReA comparison for experimental data




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In