Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Experimental Evidence of Hydroacoustic Pressure Waves in a Francis Turbine Elbow Draft Tube for Low Discharge Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Jorge Arpe, François Avellan

Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines, EPFL, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 33 bis, Avenue de Cour, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland

Christophe Nicolet1

Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines, EPFL, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 33 bis, Avenue de Cour, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerlandchristophe.nicolet@epfl.ch


Corresponding author.

J. Fluids Eng 131(8), 081102 (Jul 08, 2009) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3155944 History: Received May 13, 2008; Revised April 15, 2009; Published July 08, 2009

The complex three-dimensional unsteady flow developing in the draft tube of a Francis turbine is responsible for pressure fluctuations, which could prevent the whole hydropower plant from operating safely. Indeed, the Francis draft tube is subjected to inlet swirling flow, divergent cross section, and the change of flow direction. As a result, in low discharge off-design operating conditions, a cavitation helical vortex, so-called the vortex rope develops in the draft tube and induces pressure fluctuations in the range of 0.2–0.4 times the runner frequency. This paper presents the extensive unsteady wall pressure measurements performed in the elbow draft tube of a high specific speed Francis turbine scale model at low discharge and at usual plant value of the Thoma cavitation number. The investigation is undertaken for operating conditions corresponding to low discharge, i.e., 0.65–0.85 times the design discharge, which exhibits pressure fluctuations at surprisingly high frequency value, between 2 and 4 times the runner rotation frequency. The pressure fluctuation measurements performed with 104 pressure transducers distributed on the draft tube wall, make apparent in the whole draft tube a fundamental frequency value at 2.5 times the runner frequency. Moreover, the modulations between this frequency with the vortex rope precession frequency are pointed out. The phase shift analysis performed for 2.5 times the runner frequency enables the identification of a pressure wave propagation phenomenon and indicates the location of the corresponding pressure fluctuation excitation source in the elbow; hydroacoustic waves propagate from this source both upstream and downstream the draft tube.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Gaseous vortex core development for two different values of the Thoma cavitation number for the same low discharge operating condition

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

CAD model of the Francis turbine scale model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Locations of the 292 pressure taps along the walls of the elbow draft tube (left), and mounting of the pressure transducer at the draft tube wall (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

The investigated low discharge operating point marked in the scale model efficiency hill chart

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Influence of σ on the pressure fluctuations amplitude spectrum; each curve is offset by the corresponding σ value

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Influence of σ on the frequency and the amplitude of pressure fluctuations related to the vortex rope precession and the high frequency phenomenon, HFP

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Time history records of pressure fluctuations for the first five sections in the draft tube

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Evolution of pressure fluctuations amplitude spectra for four paths along the draft tube

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Amplitude spectra of experimental pressure fluctuations measured at S1.75, and the corresponding amplitude spectra of the two signals modulation derived from Eq. 3)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Analysis at 2.5fn frequency in the section S1.75 at the cone

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Phase shift angular distribution in the section S1.75 for the frequencies fc, fc−fv, and fc+fv

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Phase shift angular distribution in the section S1.75 for the frequency fv

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Amplitude, coherence, and phase spectra of the pressure fluctuations evidencing the 2.5fn pressure wave propagation along path 1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Unfolded representation in 2D of the phase shift in the cone and the elbow of the draft tube (top) and 3D corresponding representation (bottom) at 2.5fn frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Space distribution of the phase speed along the four paths defined in Fig. 8




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In