0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 2: Application for Rans Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship

[+] Author and Article Information
Robert V. Wilson, Fred Stern

Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, Department Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242

Hugh W. Coleman

Propulsion Research Center, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899

Eric G. Paterson

Iowa Institute Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242

J. Fluids Eng 123(4), 803-810 (Jul 10, 2001) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1412236 History: Received November 04, 1999; Revised July 10, 2001
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Mehta,  U. B., 1998, “Credible Computational Fluids Dynamics Simulations,” AIAA Journal, 36, pp. 665–667.
Stern,  F., Wilson,  R. V., Coleman,  H., and Paterson,  E., 2001, “Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations: Part 1—Comprehensive Methodology,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, published in this issue, pp. 793–802.
Stern, F., Wilson, R. V., Coleman, H., and Paterson, E., 1999, “Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations,” Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, IIHR Report No. 407.
Paterson, E. G., and Sinkovits, R. S., 1999, “Performance, Scalability, and Portability of a MPI-based version of CFDSHIP-IOWA: Results of a NAVO PET Tiger-Team Collaboration,” 9th DoD HPC Users Group Meeting, Monterey, CA, June.
Paterson, E. G., Wilson, R. V., and Stern, F., 1998, “CFDSHIP-IOWA and Steady Flow RANS Simulation of DTMB Model 5415,” Ist Symposium on Marine Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics, McLean, VA, 19–21 May.
Wilson, R., Paterson, E., and Stern, F., 1998, “Unsteady RANS CFD Method for Naval Combatant in Waves,” Proc. 22nd ONR Symposium on Naval Hydro, Washington, DC, August.
CFD Workshop Tokyo 1994, Proceedings, Vol. 1 and 2, 1994, Ship Research Institute Ministry of Transport Ship & Ocean Foundation.
Toda,  Y., Stern,  F., and Longo,  J., 1992, “Mean-Flow Measurements in the Boundary Layer and Wake and Wave Field of a Series 60 CB=.6 Model Ship—Part 1: Froude Numbers .16 and .316,” Journal of Ship Research, 36, No. 4, pp. 360–377.
Longo, J. and Stern, F., 1998, “Resistance, Sinkage and Trim, Wave Profile, and Nominal Wake and Uncertainty Assessment for DTMB Model 5512,” Proc. 25th ATTC, Iowa City, IA, 24–25 Sept.
Coleman, H. W., and Steele, W. G., 1999, Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, NY.
Ogiwara,  S., and Kajitani,  H., 1994, “Pressure Distribution on the Hull Surface of Series 60 (CB=0.60) Model,” Proceedings CFD Workshop Tokyo, 1, pp. 350–358.
Wilson, R., Paterson, E., and Stern, F., 2000 “Verification and Validation for RANS Simulation of a Naval Combatant,” Preprints of Gothenburg 2000 A Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics.
Eca, L., and Hoekstra, M., 2000, “On the Application of Verification Procedures in Computational Fluid Dynamics,” 2nd MARNET Workshop.
Roache, P. J., 1998, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Publishers, Albuqerque, New Mexico.
Larsson, L., Stern, F., and Bertram, V., 2000, “Gothenburg 2000 A Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics,” Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, Sept. 2000.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Grids and computed wave contours on the free-surface plane from verification and validation studies for Series 60: (a) and (b) coarsest—grid 4; (c) and (d) grid 3; (e) and (f ) grid 2; and (g) and (h) finest—grid 1. Ship leading and trailing edges at x/L=0 and 1, respectively.
Grahic Jump Location
Iteration history for Series 60 on grid 1: (a) solution change, (b) ship forces- CF,CP, and CT and (c) magnified view of total resistance CT over last two periods of oscillation
Grahic Jump Location
Grid study for Series 60 wave profile
Grahic Jump Location
Validation of wave profile for Series 60: (a) and (b) grid 1; and (c) and (d) grid 2. E and EC values are normalized with the maximum value for the wave profile ζmax=0.014

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In