0
Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Turbulent Flow in D-Type Corrugated Pipes: Flow Pattern and Friction Factor

[+] Author and Article Information
R. H. Erthal

Thermal Sciences Laboratory (LACIT),
Federal University of Technology—Paraná (UTFPR),
CEP. 80230-901, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

M. A. L. Gonçalves

TE/CENPES/PETROBRAS,
21941-598 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

R. E. M. Morales

Thermal Sciences Laboratory (LACIT),
Federal University of Technology—Paraná (UTFPR),
CEP. 80230-901, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
e-mail: rmorales@utfpr.edu.br

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 11, 2012; final manuscript received August 3, 2012; published online November 20, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Frank C. Visser.

J. Fluids Eng 134(12), 121202 (Nov 20, 2012) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007899 History: Received March 11, 2012; Revised August 03, 2012

Turbulent flow in d-type corrugated pipes of various aspect ratios has been numerically investigated in terms of flow pattern and friction factor, for Reynolds numbers ranging from 5000 to 100,000. The present numerical model was verified by comparing the friction factor with experimental and numerical results from the literature. The numerical analysis suggested that d-type behavior exists for groove aspect ratios up to w/k = (groove width/rib height) = 2 independent of the pitch. However, for a ratio of w/k = 3 an important change in the flow pattern occurs so that the pressure drag exerted by the groove walls becomes important. It is shown that the friction factor is independent of the groove height as long as the flow is similar to a flow in a d-type corrugated pipe. Moreover, the friction factor curve for d-type pipes shows a logarithmic behavior as function of the Reynolds number, so that a simple method can be used to derive an expression for the friction factor as a function of the Reynolds number and the relative groove width only. The results may be useful to engineering projects that require a better prediction of the friction factor in d-type corrugated pipes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Perry, A. E., Schofield, W. H., and Joubert, P. N., 1969, “Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers,” J. Fluid Mech., 37, pp. 383–413. [CrossRef]
Leonardi, S., Orlandi, P., and Antonia, R. A., 2007, “Properties of d- and k-Type Roughness in a Turbulent Channel Flow,” Phys. Fluids, 19, p. 125101. [CrossRef]
Jiménez, J., 2004, “Turbulent Flows Over Rough Walls,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, pp. 173–196. [CrossRef]
Djenidi, L., Anselmet, F., and Antonia, R. A., 1994, “LDA Measurements in a Turbulent Boundary Layer Over a d-Type Rough Wall,” Exp. Fluids, 16, pp. 323–329. [CrossRef]
Djenidi, L., Elavarasan, R., and Antonia, R. A., 1999, “The Turbulent Boundary Layer Over Transverse Square Cavities,” J. Fluid Mech., 395(4), pp. 271–294. [CrossRef]
Sutardi Ching, C. Y., 2003, “The Response of a Turbulent Boundary Layer to Different Shaped Transverse Grooves,” Exp. Fluids, 35, pp. 325–337. [CrossRef]
Chang, K., Constantinescu, G., and Park, S. O., 2006, “Analysis of the Flow and Mass Transfer Processes for the Incompressible Flow Past an Open Cavity With a Laminar and a Fully Turbulent Incoming Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 561(4), pp. 113–145. [CrossRef]
Stel, H., Morales, R. E. M., Franco, A. T., Junqueira, S. L. M., Erthal, R. H., and Gonçalves, M. A. L., 2010, “Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Turbulent Flow in Corrugated Pipes,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 132(7), p. 071203. [CrossRef]
Tani, J., 1987, “Turbulent Boundary Layer Development Over Rough Surfaces,” Perspectives in Turbulence Studies, H.Meier and P.Bradshaw, eds., Springer, New York.
Vijiapurapu, S., and Cui, J., 2007, “Simulation of Turbulent Flow in a Ribbed Pipe Using Large Eddy Simulation,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 51, pp. 1137–1165. [CrossRef]
Monson, D. J., Seegmiller, H. L., McConnaughey, P. K., and Chen, Y. S., 1990, “Comparison of Experiment With Calculations Using Curvature-Corrected Zero and Two-Equation Turbulence Models for a Two-Dimensional U-Duct,” AIAA Paper No. 90-1484.
CHAM, 2012, The PHOENICS Encyclopaedia - PHOENICS On-Line Information System, CHAM Ltd., Wimbledon, UK.
Chen, Y. S., Kim, S. W., and Ko, N. W., 1987, “Computation of Turbulent Flows Using an Extended k-Epsilon Turbulence Closure Model,” Report No. NASA-CR-179204.
Lam, C. K. G., and Bremhorst, K., 1981, “A Modified Form of the k-ε Model for Predicting Wall Turbulence,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 103(3), pp. 456–460. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V., Liu, C. H., and Sparrow, E. M., 1977, “Fully Developed Flow and Heat Transfer in Ducts Having Streamwise-Periodic Variations of Cross-Sectional Area,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 99, pp. 180–186. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, New York.
Colebrook, C. F., 1939, “Turbulent Flow in Pipes, With Particular Reference to the Transition Region Between the Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws,” J. ICE, 11, pp. 133–156. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Generic schematic drawing of the corrugated pipes studied. The dimensions for each of the geometric configurations are shown in Table 1.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Boundary conditions for the numerical domain with a single groove

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Example of the numerical mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of the velocity profile in and above the groove for numerical domains with one, two, and three grooves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Validation of the numerical model (a) comparison of numerical friction factors and experimental data from Stel et al. [8], for the geometries listed in Table 2 (b) comparison of the velocity profile in and above a d-type groove with LES data of Vijiapurapu and Cui [10], for ReDo = 100,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Numerical friction factors as a function of Reynolds number and groove width for fixed groove heights

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Numerical friction factors as a function of Reynolds number and groove height for fixed groove widths

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Streamlines from the numerical simulations for four Reynolds numbers and several representative geometric configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Difference of pressure between the vertical walls of the groove as a function of groove width and height for ReD = 50,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the numerical friction factors with the values obtained using Eq. (15) (a) values for both approaches as a function of Reynolds number and (b) direct comparison of the two approaches

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In