0
Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

Flow-Feedback Method for Mitigating the Vortex Rope in Decelerated Swirling Flows

[+] Author and Article Information
Constantin Tănasă

Scientific Researcher
Research Center for Engineering of Systems With Complex Fluids,
“Politehnica” University of Timişoara,
Boulevard Mihai Viteazu 1,
RO-300222 Timişoara, Romania
e-mail: costel@mh.mec.upt.ro

Romeo Susan-Resiga

Professor
Hydraulic Machinery Department,
“Politehnica” University of Timişoara,
Boulevard Mihai Viteazu 1,
RO-300222 Timişoara, Romania
e-mail: resiga@mh.mec.upt.ro

Sebastian Muntean

Senior Researcher
e-mail: seby@acad-tim.tm.edu.ro

Alin Ilie Bosioc

Scientific Researcher
e-mail: alin@mh.mec.upt.ro
Center for Advanced Research in Engineering Science,
Romanian Academy—Timişoara Branch,
Boulevard Mihai Viteazu 24,
RO-300223 Timişoara, Romania

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received November 7, 2012; final manuscript received March 1, 2013; published online April 12, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Mark R. Duignan.

J. Fluids Eng 135(6), 061304 (Apr 12, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: FE-12-1561; doi: 10.1115/1.4023946 History: Received November 07, 2012; Revised March 01, 2013

When reaction hydraulic turbines are operated far from the design operating regime, particularly at partial discharge, swirling flow instability is developed downstream of the runner, in the discharge cone, with a precessing helical vortex and its associated severe pressure fluctuations. Bosioc et al. (2012, “Unsteady Pressure Analysis of a Swirling Flow With Vortex Rope and Axial Water Injection in a Discharge Cone,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(8), p. 081104) showed that this instability can be successfully mitigated by injecting a water jet along the axis. However, the jet discharge is too large to be supplied with high pressure water bypassing the runner, since this discharge is associated with the volumetric loss. In the present paper we demonstrate that the control jet injected at the inlet of the conical diffuser can actually be supplied with water collected from the discharge cone outlet, thus introducing a new concept of flow feedback. In this case, the jet is driven by the pressure difference between the cone wall, where the feedback spiral case is located, and the pressure at the jet nozzle outlet. In order to reach the required threshold value of the jet discharge, we also introduce ejector pumps to partially compensate for the hydraulic losses in the return pipes. Extensive experimental investigations show that the wall pressure fluctuations are successfully mitigated when the jet reaches 12% of the main flow discharge for a typical part load turbine operating regime. About 10% of the jet discharge is supplied by the plain flow feedback, and only 2% boost is insured by the ejector pumps. As a result, this new approach paves the way towards practical applications in real hydraulic turbines.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Wan, Y.-H., and Bucaneg, D., Jr., 2002, “Short-Term Power Fluctuations of Large Wind Power Plants,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(4), pp. 427–431 [CrossRef].
Dörfler, P., Sick, M., and Coutu, A., 2013, Flow-Induced Pulsation and Vibration in Hydroelectric Machinery, Springer, Berlin, Chap. 2.
Wang, Z., and Zhou, L., 2006, “Simulations and Measurements of Pressure Oscillations Caused by Vortex Ropes,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 128(4), pp. 649–655. [CrossRef]
Ciocan, G. D., Iliescu, M. S., Vu, T. C., Nennemann, B., and Avellan, F., 2007, “Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of the FLINDT Draft Tube Rotating Vortex,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129(2), pp. 146–158. [CrossRef]
Casanova, F., 2009, “Failure Analysis of the Draft Tube Connecting Bolts of a Francis-Type Hydroelectric Power Plant,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 16(7), pp. 2202–2208, [CrossRef]
Baya, A., Muntean, S., Câmpian, V. C., Cuzmoş, A., Diaconescu, M., and Bălan, G., 2010, “Experimental Investigations of the Unsteady Flow in a Francis Turbine Draft Tube Cone,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 12, p. 012007. [CrossRef]
Frunzaverde, D., Muntean, S., Marginean, G., Campian, V., Marsavina, L., Terzi, R., and Serban, V., 2010, “Failure Analysis of a Francis Turbine Runner,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 12, p. 012115 [CrossRef].
International Electrotechnical Commission, 1999, Hydraulic Turbines, Storage Pumps and Pumps-Turbines Model Acceptance, 2nd ed., International Standard IEC No. 60193.
Anton, I., 1979, Hydraulic Turbines, Facla Publishing House, Timisoara, Romania (in Romanian).
Kral, L. D., 2000, “Active Flow Control Technology,” ASME FED, Technical Brief, pp. 1–28.
Thicke, R. H., 1981, “Practical Solutions for Draft Tube Instability,” Water Power & Dam Construction, 33(2), pp. 31–37.
Papillon, B., Sabourin, M., Couston, M., and Deschenes, C., 2002, “Methods for Air Admission in Hydro Turbines,” Proceedings of the 21st IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 1–6.
Qian, Z.-D., Yang, J.-D., and Huai, W.-X., 2007, “Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Pressure Pulsation in Francis Hydraulic Turbine With Air Admission,” J. Hydrodyn., Ser. B, 19(4), pp. 467–472. [CrossRef]
Nishi, M., Wang, X. M., Yoshida, K., Takahashi, T., and Tsukamoto, T., 1996, “An Experimental Study on Fins, Their Role in Control of the Draft Tube Surging,” Proceedings of the 18th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, E.Cabrera, V. Espert, and F. Martinez, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Vol. 2, pp. 905–914.
Vevke, T., 2004, “An Experimental Investigation of Draft Tube Flow,” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Qian, Z. D., Li, W., Huai, W. X., and Wu, Y. L., 2012, “The Effect of the Runner Cone Design on Pressure Oscillation Characteristics in a Francis Hydraulic Turbine,” Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power Energy, 226(1), pp. 137–150. [CrossRef]
Kurokawa, J., Kajigaya, A., Matusi, J., and Imamura, H., 2000, “Suppression of Swirl in a Conical Diffuser by Use of J-Groove,” Proceedings of the 20th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Charlotte, NC, Paper No. DY-01, pp. 1–10.
Kurokawa, J., Imamura, H., and Choi, Y.-D., 2010, “Effect of J-Groove on the Suppression of Swirl Flow in a Conical Diffuser,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 132(7), p. 071101. [CrossRef]
Lewis, B. J., Cimbala, J. M., and Wouden, A. M., 2012, “Investigation of Distributor Vane Jets to Decrease the Unsteady Load on Hydro Turbine Runner Blades,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 15, p. 022006. [CrossRef]
Kjeldsen, M., Olsen, K., Nielsen, T., and Dahlhaug, O., 2006, “Water Injection for the Mitigation of Draft Tube Pressure Pulsations,” Proceedings of the 1st IAHR International Meeting of Working Group on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1–11.
Susan-Resiga, R., Muntean, S., Hasmatuchi, V., Anton, I., and Avellan, F., 2010, “Analysis and Prevention of Vortex Breakdown in the Simplified Discharge Cone of a Francis Turbine,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 132(5), p. 051102. [CrossRef]
Bosioc, A. I., Susan-Resiga, R., Muntean, S., and Tănasă, C., 2012, “Unsteady Pressure Analysis of a Swirling Flow With Vortex Rope and Axial Water Injection in a Discharge Cone,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(8), p. 081104. [CrossRef]
Kirschner, O., Schmidt, H., Ruprecht, A., Mader, R., and Meusburger, P., 2010, “Experimental Investigation of Vortex Control With an Axial Jet in the Draft Tube of a Model Pump-Turbine,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 12, p. 012092. [CrossRef]
Blommaert, G., Prenat, J. E., Avellan, F., and Boyer, A., 1999, “Active Control of Francis Turbine Operation Stability,” Proceedings of the 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, San Francisco, CA, Paper No. FEDSM99-7210 3.
Blommaert, G., 2000, “Étude du Comportement Dynamique des Turbines Francis: Contrôle Active de Leur Stabilité de Fonctionnement,” Ph.D. thèse No. 2222, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Susan-Resiga, R., Vu, T. C., Muntean, S., Ciocan, G. D., and Nennemann, B., 2006, “Jet Control of the Draft Tube in Francis Turbines at Partial Discharge,” Proceedings of the 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Yokohama, Japan, Paper No. F192, pp. 1–14.
Zhang, R., Mao, F., Wu, J., Chen, S., Wu, Y., and Liu, S., 2009, “Characteristics and Control of the Draft-Tube Flow in Part-Load Francis Turbine,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 131(2), p. 021101 [CrossRef].
Susan-Resiga, R., and Muntean, S., 2009, “Decelerated Swirling Flow Control in the Discharge Cone of Francis Turbines,” Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Fluid Machinery and Fluid Mechanics (ISFMFE), Beijing, China, pp. 89–96 [CrossRef].
Susan-Resiga, R., Muntean, S., Tanasa, C., and Bosioc, A. I., 2008, “Hydrodynamic Design and Analysis of a Swirling Flow Generator,” Proceedings of the 4th German-Romanian Workshop of Vortex Dynamics in Hydraulic Machinery, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 1–16.
Ojima, A., and Kamemoto, K., 2010, “Vortex Method Simulation of 3D and Unsteady Vortices in a Swirling Flow Apparatus Experimented in ‘Politehnica’ University of Timisoara,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 12, p. 012065. [CrossRef]
Bergman, O., 2010, “Numerical Investigation of the Flow in a Swirl Generator Using OpenFOAM,” M.S. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Goetenburg, Sweden.
Petit, O., Bosioc, A. I., Nilsson, H., Muntean, S., and Susan-Resiga, R. F., 2011, “Unsteady Simulations of the Flow in a Swirl Generator Using OpenFOAM,” Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst., 4(1), pp. 199–208. [CrossRef]
Abernethy, R. B., Benedict, R. P., and Dowdell, R. B., 1985, “ASME Measurement Uncertainty,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 107(2), pp. 161–164. [CrossRef]
Moffat, R. J., 1982, “Contribution to the Theory of Single-Sample Uncertainty Analysis,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 104(2), pp. 250–258. [CrossRef]
Tanasa, C., Bosioc, A. I., Susan-Resiga, R., and Muntean, S., 2012, “Experimental Investigations of the Swirling Flow in the Conical Diffuser Using Flow-Feedback Control Technique With Additional Energy Source,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 15, p. 062043. [CrossRef]
Spiridonov, E. K., 2005, “Designing an Ejector Pump for a Hydraulic System for Discharging Water and Emptying Tanks,” Chem. Petroleum Eng., 41(1–2), pp. 66–74. [CrossRef]
Vu, T. C., and Retieb, S., 2002, “Accuracy Assessment of Current CFD Tools to Predict Hydraulic Turbine Efficiency Hill Chart,” Proceedings of the 21st IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. 1, pp. 193–198.
Morel, L., 1983, “Potential for Reducing Kinetic Energy Losses in Low-Head Hydropower Installations,” Technical Report No. 221, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Riley, K. F., Hobson, M. P., and Bence, S. J., 2002, Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, Chap. 12.8.
Jacob, T., and Prenat, J., 1996, “Francis Turbine Surge: Discussion and Data Base,” Proceedings of the 18th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, E.Cabrera, V. Espert, and F. Martinez, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Vol. 2, pp. 855–865.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cross section through a Francis hydraulic turbine (a) vortex rope in the discharge cone and (b) flow-feedback system with jet injection into the discharge cone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cross section through the swirling flow apparatus and detail of the swirl generator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of the flow-feedback system (FFM) implemented on the swirl apparatus and a cross section through the swirl generator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Collecting spiral case (a) radius of the cross section, (b) top view of the twin spiral case, (c) meridian cross-section geometry, and (d) transversal cross-section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flow-feedback system with ejector pumps (FFM+) and a detail with the ejector pump

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pressure loss on the return pipes versus jet discharge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dimensionless pressure coefficient measured on the conical diffuser wall for swirling flow with vortex rope and with flow-feedback control, respectively

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pressure fluctuation when using the FFM: original signal (left) and its Fourier spectrum (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pressure fluctuation when using the FFM+: original signal (left) and its Fourier spectrum (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Dimensionless amplitude (a) Strouhal number and (b) versus the jet discharge fraction presented by Bosioc et al. [22]. FFM and FFM+ are marked on both figures.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Mitigation of the pressure fluctuations using FFM and FFM+ with respect to the vortex rope case at the four levels shown in Fig. 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Rotating and plunging pressure fluctuation decomposition for swirling flow with vortex rope (a), FFM (b), and FFM+ (c), respectively, at the four levels shown in Fig. 2

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In