0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

# Vortex Shedding in a Tandem Circular Cylinder System With a Yawed Downstream Cylinder

[+] Author and Article Information
Stephen J. Wilkins

e-mail: x514a@unb.ca

James D. Hogan

e-mail: v3679@unb.ca

Joseph W. Hall

e-mail: jwhall@unb.ca
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of New Brunswick,

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 3, 2012; final manuscript received March 5, 2013; published online May 15, 2013. Editor: Malcolm J. Andrews.

J. Fluids Eng 135(7), 071202 (May 15, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: FE-12-1224; doi: 10.1115/1.4023949 History: Received May 03, 2012; Revised March 05, 2013

## Abstract

This investigation examines the flow produced by a tandem cylinder system with the downstream cylinder yawed to the mean flow direction. The yaw angle was varied from $α=90deg$ (two parallel tandem cylinders) to $α=60deg$; this has the effect of varying the local spacing ratio between the cylinders. Fluctuating pressure and hot-wire measurements were used to determine the vortex-shedding frequencies and flow regimes produced by this previously uninvestigated flow. The results showed that the frequency and magnitude of the vortex shedding varies along the cylinder span depending on the local spacing ratio between the cylinders. In all cases the vortex-shedding frequency observed on the front cylinder had the same shedding frequency as the rear cylinder. In general, at small local spacing ratios the cylinders behaved as a single large body with the shear layers separating from the upstream cylinder and attaching on the downstream cylinder, this caused a correspondingly large, low frequency wake. At other positions where the local span of the tandem cylinder system was larger, small-scale vortices began to form in the gap between the cylinders, which in turn increased the vortex-shedding frequency. At the largest spacings, classical vortex shedding persisted in the gap formed between the cylinders, and both cylinders shed vortices as separate bodies with shedding frequencies typical of single cylinders. At certain local spacing ratios two distinct vortex-shedding frequencies occurred indicating that there was some overlap in these flow regimes.

<>

## References

Khorrami, M. R., Choudhari, M. M., Lockard, D. P., Jenkins, L. N., and McGinley, C. B., 2007, “Unsteady Flowfield Around Tandem Cylinders as Prototype Component Interaction in Airframe Noise,” AIAA J., 45(8), pp. 1930–1941.
Fitzpatrick, J., 2003, “Flow/Acoustic Interactions of Two Cylinders in Cross-Flow,” J. Fluids Struct., 17, pp. 97–113.
Ramberg, S., 1983, “The Effects of Yaw Angle and Finite Length Upon the Vortex Wakes of Stationary and Vibrating Circular Cylinders,” J. Fluid Mech., 128, pp. 81–107.
Snarski, S. R., 2003, “Flow Over Yawed Circular Cylinders: Wall Pressure Spectra and Flow Regimes,” Phys. Fluids, 16, pp. 344–359.
Marshall, J., 2003, “Wake Dynamics of a Yawed Cylinder,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 125, pp. 97–103.
Hogan, J. D., and Hall, J. W., 2010, “The Spanwise Dependence of Vortex-Shedding From Yawed Circular Cylinders,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 132, p. 031301.
Hori, E., 1959, “Experiments on Flow Around a Pair of Parallel Circular Cylinders,” Proceedings of the 9th Japan National Congress for Applied Mechanics, pp. 231–234.
Arie, M., Kiya, M., Moriya, M., and Mori, H., 1983, “Pressure Fluctuations on the Surface of Two Circular Cylinders in Tandem Arrangement,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 105, pp. 161–167.
Zdravkovich, M. M., 1977, “Review of Flow Interference Between Two Circular Cylinders in Various Arrangements,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 99, pp. 618–633.
Zdravkovich, M. M., 1987, “The Effects of Interference Between Circular Cylinders in Cross Flow,” J. Fluids Struct., 1, pp. 239–261.
Zdravkovich, M., 2003, Flow Around Circular Cylinders, Vol 2: Applications. Oxford Science, Oxford.
Hall, J. W., Ziada, S., and Weaver, D., 2003, “Vortex-Shedding From Single and Tandem Cylinders in the Presence of Applied Sound,” J. Fluids Struct., 18, pp. 741–758.
Mohany, A., and Ziada, S., 2005, “Flow-Excited Acoustic Resonance of Two Tandem Cylinders in Cross-Flow,” J. Fluids Struct., 21(1), pp. 103–119.
Xu, G., and Zhou, Y., 2004, “Strouhal Numbers in the Wake of Two Inline Cylinders,” Exp. Fluids, 37(2), pp. 248–256.
Igarashi, T., 1981, “Characteristics of the Flow Around Two Circular Cylinders Arranged in Tandem: 1st Report,” Bull. JSME, 24(188), pp. 323–331.
Igarashi, T., 1984, “Characteristics of the Flow Around Two Circular Cylinders Arranged in Tandem: 2nd Report, Unique Phenomenon at Small Spacing,” Bull. JSME, 27(233), pp. 2380–2387.
Ljungkrona, L., Norberg, C., and Sunden, B., 1991, “Free-Stream Turbulence and Tube Spacing Effects on Surface Pressure Fluctuations for Two Tubes in an In-Line Arrangement,” J. Fluids Struct., 5, pp. 701–727.
Ljungkrona, L., and Sunden, B., 1993, “Flow Visualization and Surface Pressure Measurement on Two Tubes in an Inline Arrangement,” Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 6, pp. 15–27.
Okajima, A., 1979, “Flows Around Two Tandem Circular Cylinders at Very High Reynolds Numbers,” Bull. JSME, 22, pp. 504–511.
Wu, J., Welch, L., Welsh, M., Sheridan, J., and Walker, G., 1994, “Spanwise Wake Structures of a Circular Cylinder and Two Circular Cylinders in Tandem,” Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 9, pp. 299–308.
Lam, K., Lin, Y., Zou, L., and Liu, Y., 2012, “Numerical Simulation of Flows Around Two Unyawed and Yawed Wavy Cylinders in Tandem Arrangement,” J. Fluids Struct., 28, pp. 135–151.
Sumner, D., 2010, “Two Circular Cylinders in Cross-Flow: A Review,” J. Fluids Struct., 26, pp. 849–899.
Hogan, J. D., and Hall, J. W., 2011, “Experimental Study of Pressure Fluctuations from Yawed Circular Cylinders,” AIAA J., 49(11), pp. 2349–2356.
Gerrard, J., 1955, “Measurements of the Sound From Circular Cylinders in an Airstream,” Proc. Phys. Soc., 7, pp. 453–461.

## Figures

Fig. 1

Schematic of various yawed tandem cylinder systems with local spacing ratios, S/D, shown at the narrow, middle, and wide ends for (a) α=90 deg, (b) α=80 deg, (c) α=70 deg, and (d) α=60 deg

Fig. 2

Microphone power spectra normalized by dynamic head squared q2 for α=90 deg for two azimuthal angles, γ=70 deg and γ=90 deg

Fig. 3

Normalized power spectra at various spanwise locations for α=80 deg

Fig. 4

Normalized power spectra at various spanwise locations for α=70 deg

Fig. 5

Normalized power spectra at various spanwise locations for α=60 deg

Fig. 6

Comparison of flow regimes for (a) α=90 deg, (b) α=80 deg, (c) α=70 deg, and (d) α=60 deg

## Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

### Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related Proceedings Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections