Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

A Nonlinear Computational Model of Floating Wind Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Ali Nematbakhsh

Graduate Research Assistant
Student Mem. ASME
e-mail: ali.nb@wpi.edu

David J. Olinger

Associate Professor
e-mail: olinger@wpi.edu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
Worcester, MA 01609

Gretar Tryggvason

Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556-5684
e-mail: gtryggva@nd.edu

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 4, 2012; final manuscript received July 24, 2013; published online September 12, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Zvi Rusak.

J. Fluids Eng 135(12), 121103 (Sep 12, 2013) (13 pages) Paper No: FE-12-1605; doi: 10.1115/1.4025074 History: Received December 04, 2012; Revised July 24, 2013

The dynamic motion of floating wind turbines is studied using numerical simulations. The full three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations are solved on a regular structured grid using a level set method for the free surface and an immersed boundary method for the turbine platform. The tethers, the tower, the nacelle, and the rotor weight are included using reduced-order dynamic models, resulting in an efficient numerical approach that can handle nearly all the nonlinear hydrodynamic forces on the platform, while imposing no limitation on the platform motion. Wind speed is assumed constant, and rotor gyroscopic effects are accounted for. Other aerodynamic loadings and aeroelastic effects are not considered. Several tests, including comparison with other numerical, experimental, and grid study tests, have been done to validate and verify the numerical approach. The response of a tension leg platform (TLP) to different amplitude waves is examined, and for large waves, a nonlinear trend is seen. The nonlinearity limits the motion and shows that the linear assumption will lead to overprediction of the TLP response. Studying the flow field behind the TLP for moderate amplitude waves shows vortices during the transient response of the platform but not at the steady state, probably due to the small Keulegan–Carpenter number. The effects of changing the platform shape are considered, and finally, the nonlinear response of the platform to a large amplitude wave leading to slacking of the tethers is simulated.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Heronemus, W. E., 1972, “Power From Offshore Winds,” Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference and Exposition on Applications of Marine Technology to Human Needs, Washington, DC, pp. 435–466.
Tong, K., 1998, “Technical and Economical Aspects of a Floating Offshore Windfarm,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 74, pp. 399–410. [CrossRef]
Henderson, A. R., and Patel, M. H., 2003, “On the Modeling of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine,” Wind Eng., 6(1), pp. 53–86. [CrossRef]
Ushiyama, I., Seki, K., and Miura, H., 2004, “A Feasibility Study for Floating Offshore Windfarms in Japanese Waters,” Wind Eng., 28(4), pp. 383–397. [CrossRef]
Butterfield, S., Musial, W., Jonkman, J., and Sclavounos, P., 2005, “Engineering Challenges for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines,” Copenhagen Offshore Wind Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Musial, W., Butterfield, S., and Boone, A., 2004, “Feasibility of Floating Platform Systems for Wind Turbines,” 23rd ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV.
Sclavounos, P., 2009, “Floating Offshore Wind Turbines,” Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 42(2), pp. 39–43. [CrossRef]
Utsunomiya, T., Nishida, E., and Sato, I., 2009, “Wave Response Experiment on SPAR-Type Floating Bodies for Offshore Wind Turbine,” Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan.
Phuc, P. V., and Ishihara, T., 2007, “A Study on the Dynamic Response of a Semi-Submersible Floating Offshore Wind Turbine System Part 2: Numerical Simulation,” Twelfth International Conference on Wind Engineering, Cairns, Australia.
Karimirad, M., Meissonnier, Q., Gao, Z., and Moan, T., 2011, “Hydroelastic Code-To-Code Comparison for a Tension Leg Spar-Type Floating Wind Turbine,” Mar. Struct., 24(4), pp. 412–435. [CrossRef]
Larsen, T. J., 2009, HAWC2. The User's Manual, version 3-8, Riso DTU National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Roskilde, Denmark.
Hansen, M. O., Aas Jakobsen, K., Holmas, T., and Amdahl, J., 2009, “VPONE–a New FEM Based Servo Hydro-and Aeroelastic Code for Wind Turbines,” Proceedings of European Offshore Wind, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karimirad, M., and Moan, T., 2011, “Extreme Dynamic Structural Response Analysis of Catenary Moored Spar Wind Turbine in Harsh Environmental Conditions,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 133, p. 041103. [CrossRef]
Sclavounos, P. D., Lee, S., DiPietro, J., Potenza, G., Caramuscio, P., and De Michele, G., 2010, “Floating Offshore Wind Turbine: Tension Leg Platform and Taught Leg Buoy Concepts Supporting 3-5 Mw Wind Turbines,” European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, Warsaw, Poland.
Shim, S., and Kim, M. H., 2008, “Rotor-Floater-Tether Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Floating Wind Turbines,” Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, BC.
Jonkman, J. M., 2009, “Dynamics of Offshore Floating Wind Turbines. Model Development and Verification,” Wind Eng., 12(5), pp. 459–492. [CrossRef]
Roddier, D., Cermelli, C., Aubault, A., and Weinstein, A., 2010, “WindFloat: A Floating Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine,” J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 2(3), p. 033104. [CrossRef]
Nielsen, F. G., Hanson, T. D., and Skaare, B., 2006, “Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines,” 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, Germany.
Lee, C. H., and Newman, J. N., 2006, WAMIT User Manual, versions 6.3, 6.3PC, 6.3S, 6.3S PC., WAMIT, Inc., Chestnut Hill, MA.
Jonkman, J. M., and Sclavonous, P. D., 2006, “Development of Fully Coupled Aeroelastic and Hydrodynamic Models for Offshore Wind Turbines,” Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.
Jonkman, J. M., and Buhl, M. L., 2007, “Loads Analysis of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using Fully Coupled Simulation,” Wind Power Conference and Exhibition, Los Angeles, CA.
Karimirad, M., 2010, “Dynamic Response of Floating Wind Turbines,” Sci. Iran., 17(2B), pp. 146–156.
Stewart, G. M., Lackner, M. A., Robertson, A. N., Jonkman, J. M., and Goupee, A. J., 2006, “Calibration and Validation of a FAST Floating Wind Turbine Model of the DeepCwind Scaled Tension-Leg Platform,” 22nd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece.
Yabe, T., Xiao, F., and Utsumi, T., 2001, “The Constrained Interpolation Profile Method for Multiphase Analysis,” J. Comput. Phys., 169(2), pp. 556–593. [CrossRef]
Patankar, N. A., and Sharma, N., 2005, “A Fast Projection Scheme for the Direct Numerical Simulation Of Rigid Particulate Flows,” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., 21(8), pp. 419–432. [CrossRef]
Nematbakhsh, A., Olinger, D. J., and Tryggvason, G., 2011, “A Computational Simulation of the Motion of Floating Wind Turbine Platforms,” WIT Trans. Built Environ., 115, pp. 181–191. [CrossRef]
Nematbakhsh, A., Olinger, D. J., and Tryggvason, G., 2012, “Development and Validation of a Computational Model for Floating Wind Turbine Platforms,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, AIAA Paper No. 2012-0373.
Nematbakhsh, A., Olinger, D. J., and Tryggvason, G., 2012, “A Nonlinear Computational Model for Floating Wind Turbines,” 5th Symposium on Transport Phenomena in Energy Conversion From Clean and Sustainable Resources, Rio Grande, PR.
Olinger, D. J., DeStefano, E., Murphy, E., Naqvi, S., and Tryggvason, G., 2012, “Scale-Model Experiments on Floating Wind Turbine Platforms,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, AIAA Paper No. 2012-0375.
Jonkman, J. S., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G., 2009, “Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development,” Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.
Sorensen, R. M., 2006, Basic Coastal Engineering, Springer, New York.
Yang, J., and Stern, F., 2009, “Sharp Interface Immersed-Boundary/Level-Set Method for Wave–Body Interactions,” J. Comput. Phys., 228(17), pp. 6590–6616. [CrossRef]
Bearman, P. W., Downie, M. J., Graham, J. M., and Obasaju, E. D., 1985, “Forces on Cylinders in Viscous Oscillatory Flow at Low Keulegan-Carpenter Numbers,” J. Fluids Mech., 154(1), pp. 337–356. [CrossRef]
Falgout, R., Cleary, A., Jones, J., Chow, E., Henson, V., Baldwin, C., Brown, P., Vassilevski, P., and Yang, U. M., “Hypre User's Manual, Version 2.7,” Center for Applied Scientific Computing (CASC), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.
Osher, S. J., and Sethian, J. A., 1988, “Fronts Propagating With Curvature-Dependent Speed: Algorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations,” J. Comput. Phys., 79, pp. 12–49. [CrossRef]
Fedkiw, R. P., Aslam, T., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., 1999, “A Non-Oscillatory Eulerian Approach to Interfaces in Multimaterial Flows (The Ghost Fluid Method),” J. Comput. Phys., 152(2), pp. 457–492. [CrossRef]
Sussman, M., and Fatemi, E., 1999, “An Efficient Interface-Preserving Level Set Redistancing Algorithm and Its Application to Interfacial Incompressible Fluid Flow,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20(4), pp. 1165–1191. [CrossRef]
Ogayar, C. J., Segura, R. J., and Feito, F. R., 2005, “Points in Solid Strategies,” Comput. Graphics, 29, pp. 616–624. [CrossRef]
Jensen, C., 2011, “Numerical Simulation of Gyroscopic Effects in Ansys,” M.S. thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Arnold, R. N., and Maunder, L., 2006, GyroDynamics and Its Engineering Application, Academic, New York, pp. 83–93.
Pao, L. Y., and Johnson, K. E., 2009, “A Tutorial on the Dynamics and Control of Wind Turbines and Wind Farms,” American Control Conference, St. Louis, MO.
Wu, G. X., Taylor, R. E., and Greaves, D. M., 2001, “The Effect of Viscosity on the Transient Free-Surface Waves in a Two-Dimensional Tank,” J. Eng. Math., 40, pp. 77–90. [CrossRef]
Lai, M., and Peskin, C. S., 2000, “An Immersed Boundary Method With Formal Second-Order Accuracy and Reduced Numerical Viscosity,” J. Comput. Phys., 160(2), pp. 705–719. [CrossRef]
He, X., and Doolen, D., 1997, “Lattice Boltzmann Method on a Curvilinear Coordinate System: Vortex Shedding Behind a Circular Cylinder,” Phys. Rev. E, 56(1), pp. 434–440. [CrossRef]
Henderson, R. D., 1995, “Details of the Drag Curve Near the Onset of Vortex Shedding,” Phys. Fluids, 7, pp. 2102–2104. [CrossRef]
Williamson, C., 1988, “The Existence of Two Stages in the Transition to Three-Dimensionality of a Cylinder Wake,” Phys. Fluids, 31, pp. 3165–3168. [CrossRef]
Hammache, M., and Gharib, M., 1989, “A Novel Method to Promote Parallel Vortex Shedding in the Wake of Circular Cylinders,” Phys. Fluids, 1(10), pp. 1611–1614. [CrossRef]
Jung, K. H., Chang, K. A., and Jo, H. J., 2006, “Viscous Effect on the Roll Motion of a Rectangular Structure,” J. Eng. Mech., 132(2), pp. 190–200. [CrossRef]
Koo, W., and Kim, H., 2004, “Freely Floating-Body Simulation by a 2D Fully Nonlinear Numerical Wave Tank,” J. Ocean Eng., 31(16), pp. 2011–2046. [CrossRef]
Wayman, E. N., Sclavounos, P. D., Jonkman, J., and Musial, W., 2006, “Coupled Dynamic Modeling of Floating Wind Turbine Systems,” Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX.
Sarpkaya, T., 1986, “Force on a Circular Cylinder in Viscous Oscillatory Flow at Low Keulegan-Carpenter Numbers,” J. Fluid Mech., 165, pp. 61–71. [CrossRef]
Guilmineau, E., and Queutey, P., 2002, “A Numerical Simulation of Vortex Shedding From and Oscillating Circular Cylinder,” J. Fluids Struct., 16(6), pp. 773–794. [CrossRef]
Yu, G., Avital, E. J., and Williams, J., 2008, “Large Eddy Simulation of Flow Past Free Surface Piercing Circular Cylinders,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130(10), p. 101304. [CrossRef]
Bea, R., Xu, T., Stear, J., and Ramos, R., 1999, “Wave Forces on Decks of Offshore Platforms,” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 125(3), pp. 136–144. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The baseline tension leg platform with a 5-MW wind turbine. Notation: 1-rotor, 2-nacelle, 3-tower, 4-platform tank, 5-tank ballast section, 6-spoke, 7-tether.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Three different views of the upstream part of the computational grid. The grid consists of straight lines that are unevenly spaced to give a fine resolution around the platform.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

A flow chart of the algorithm for numerical modeling of a floating wind turbine, based on the Navier–Stokes equations. xsi: points required for tracking the wind turbine; ϕ: distance function for tracking the free surface.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of the numerical results with the analytical solution [22] for the amplitude of a decaying wave in a closed flume

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vortex shedding behind a two-dimensional cylinder for Reynolds number equal to 150. Dashed and solid lines represent negative and positive vorticity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Results from the grid resolution study for the pitch motion of a block. (b) A comparison of the pitch motion results from the finest grid with the experimental results of Ref. [48].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the response amplitude operators (RAO) given by current developed numerical model with the experimental and theoretical results of Ref. [48]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Two frames showing the motion of the floating platform (a) at t = 213 s and (b) at 218 s (when the wave has propagated half its wavelength) for the baseline run

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) The wave height, measured half a wavelength upstream of tension leg platform; (b) the surge and heave response; (c) the pitch response; (d) the upstream and downstream tether forces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Top view of the velocity vectors at the midsection of the floating wind turbine tank in the very beginning of the transient region (t = 23 s). The solid line shows the floating wind turbine tank border. Note that slight deviation of the velocity field on the solid border grids with respect to the inside solid is due to transition region from solid to fluid.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Surge response of the TLP to different incoming wave heights. At a wave period of 10 s, a linear trend is observed for low and moderate amplitude waves but not for very large waves. (b) Wind turbine interacting with a 13.5 -m wave. Waves radiated from the floater tank can be seen around the platform.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

A comparison of the peak-to-peak pitch responses and the tether forces at steady state for different designs of the floating wind turbine tank. R shows the radius of three different platform tanks, which is normalized based on the radius of the standard tank.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The response of the TLP to a large nonlinear wave. (a) The very beginning of the simulation; (b) after 6.25 s. Splashing of the water can be seen behind the tank.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

(a) The pitch and surge response of the TLP for large nonlinear wave versus time; (b) the tether forces versus time




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In