0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Cavitation Characteristics of S-Blade Used in Fully Reversible Pump-Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
T. M. Premkumar

Hydroturbomachines Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India
e-mail: tmichamech@gmail.com

Pankaj Kumar

Hydroturbomachines Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India
e-mail: pankaj20221@gmail.com

Dhiman Chatterjee

Hydroturbomachines Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India
e-mail: dhiman@iitm.ac.in

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received June 11, 2013; final manuscript received January 1, 2014; published online March 10, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Zvi Rusak.

J. Fluids Eng 136(5), 051101 (Mar 10, 2014) (15 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1367; doi: 10.1115/1.4026441 History: Received June 11, 2013; Revised January 01, 2014

S-shaped blade profiles with double camber find use in fully reversible turbomachines that can extract power from tides. Though noncavitating characteristics of S-blades were determined in the past, yet characterizing cavitating flow was not carried out. This work, which is the first step in this direction, uses a two-pronged approach of experimental and numerical characterization of cavitating flow past these hydrofoils. Experimental results indicate that as the angle of attack increases in either positive or negative directions, cavitation inception number increases. Minimum cavitation effect is observed at 2 deg, which is zero lift angle of attack. For higher angles of attack (±6deg, ±4deg) and moderate or low cavitation number (σ/σi0.3), unsteady cloud cavitation was characterized through visual observation and from pressure fluctuation data. It was observed that for unsteady cavity shedding to take place is the length and thickness of the cavity should be more than 50% and 10% of the chord length, respectively. Predicting flow past this geometry is difficult and the problem may be compounded in many applications because of laminar-to-turbulence transition as well as due to the presence of cavitation. Present simulations indicate that the k-kL-ω transition model may be useful in predicting hydrodynamic performance of this type of geometry and for the range of Reynolds number considered in this paper. Hydrodynamic performance under cavitation indicates that pumping mode is more adversely affected by cavitation and, hence, a fully reversible turbomachine may not perform equally well in turbine and pump modes as expected from noncavitating results.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Simeons, C., 1980, Hydropower: The Use of Water as an Alternative Source of Energy, Pergamon Press, New York.
Ravindran, M., 1978, “Design and Flow Investigation on a Fully-Reversible Pump-Turbine,” Ph.D. thesis, IIT Madras, India.
Madhusudan, R. S., Aswatha Narayana, P. A., Balabaskaran, V., and Tulapukara, E. G., 1994, “Boundary Layer Studies Over a S-Blade,” Fluid Dyn. Res., 14(5), pp. 241–258. [CrossRef]
Ramachandran, R. M., Radha Krishna, H. C., and Aswatha Narayana, P., 1986, “Cascade Experiment Over S-Blade,” ASCE J. Energy Eng., 112(1), pp. 37–50. [CrossRef]
Prem Kumar, T. M., and Chatterjee, D., 2008, “Numerical Study of Turbulent Flow Over an S-Shaped Hydrofoil,” IMechE J. Mech. Eng. Sci. C, 222, pp. 1717–1734. [CrossRef]
Balabaskaran, V., Lakshmana Gowda, B. H., and Venkatasubramanian, N., 1998, “Flow Visualization Studies Over S-Blade,” J. Flow Vis. Image Process., 5, pp. 249–259.
Walters, D. K., and Leylek, J., 2005, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wake-Induced Transition on a Compressor-Like Flat Plate,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127, pp. 52–63. [CrossRef]
Walters, D. K., and Davor, C., 2008, “A Three-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Model for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Transitional Flow,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130, pp. 1–14. [CrossRef]
Genc, M., 2010, “Numerical Simulation of Flow Over a Thin Aerofoil at a High Reynolds Number Using a Transition Model,” IMechE J. Mech. Eng. Sci. C, 224, pp. 2155–2164. [CrossRef]
Arakeri, V. H., and Acosta, A. J., 1973, “Viscous Effect in the Inception of Cavitation on Axisymmetric Bodies,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 95(4), pp. 519–527. [CrossRef]
Franc, J., and Michel, J., 1985, “Attached Cavitation and the Boundary Layer: Experimental Investigation and Numerical Treatment,” J. Fluid Mech., 154, pp. 63–90. [CrossRef]
Briancon-Marjollet, L., Franc, J., and Michel, J., 1990, “Transient Bubble Interaction With an Attached Cavity and the Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 218, pp. 355–376. [CrossRef]
Callenaere, M., Franc, J. P., Michel, J., and Riondet, M., 2001, “The Cavitation Instability Induced by the Development of a Re-Entrant Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 444, pp. 223–256. [CrossRef]
Kawanami, Y., Kato, H., Yamaguchi, H., Tanimura, M., and Tagaya, Y., 1997, “Mechanism and Control of Cloud Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 119, pp. 788–794. [CrossRef]
Leroux, J., Astolfi, J., and Billard, J., 2004, “An Experimental Study of Unsteady Partial Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 126, pp. 94–101. [CrossRef]
Keil, T., Pelz, F. P., Cordes, U., and Ludwig, G., 2011, “Cloud Cavitation and Cavitation Erosion in Convergent Divergent Nozzle,” WIMRC 3rd International Cavitation Forum 2011, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Amromin, E., Kopriva, J., Arndt, R. E. A., and Wosnik, M., 2006, “Hydrofoil Drag Reduction by Partial Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 128, pp. 931–936. [CrossRef]
Blake, K. W., Wolpert, M. J., and Geib, F. E., 1977, “Cavitation Noise and Inception as Influenced by Boundary-Layer Development on a Hydrofoil,” J. Fluid Mech., 80, pp. 617–640. [CrossRef]
Ceccio, S. L., and Brennen, C. E., 1991, “Observations of the Dynamics and Acoustics of Traveling Bubble Cavitation,” J. Fluid Mech., 233, pp. 633–660. [CrossRef]
Kjeldsen, M., Arndt, R. E. A., and Effertz, M., 2000, “Spectral Characteristics of Sheet/Cloud Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 122, pp. 481–487. [CrossRef]
Kubota, A., Kato, H., and Yamaguchi, H., 1992, “A New Modeling of Cavitating Flows: A Numerical Study of Unsteady Cavitation on a Hydrofoil Section,” J. Fluid Mech, 240, pp. 59–96. [CrossRef]
Kinnas, A., and Neal, F. E., 1993, “A Numerical Nonlinear Analysis of the Flow Around Two- and Three-Dimensional Partially Cavitating Hydrofoils,” J. Fluid Mech., 254, pp. 151–181. [CrossRef]
Rusak, Z., Morris, W. J. I., and Peles, Y., 2007, “Prediction of Leading-Edge Sheet Cavitation Inception on Hydrofoils at Low to Moderate Reynolds Numbers Flows,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129, pp. 1540–1546. [CrossRef]
Singhal, A. K., Athavale, M. M., Li, H., and Jiang, Y., 2002, “Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124, pp. 617–623. [CrossRef]
Sauer, J., and Schnerr, G. H., 2001, “Development of a New Cavitation Model Based on Bubble Dynamics,” Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 81, pp. 561–562. [CrossRef]
Coutier-Delgosha, O., Fortes-Patella, R., and Reboud, J., 2003, “Evaluation of the Turbulence Model Influence on the Numerical Simulations of Unsteady Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 125, pp. 38–45. [CrossRef]
Coutier-Delgosha, O., Devillers, J. F., and Pichon, T., 2006, “Internal Structure and Dynamics of Sheet Cavitation,” Phys. Fluids, 18, pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Coutier-Delgosha, O., Deniset, F., Astolfi, J., and Leroux, J., 2007, “Numerical Prediction of Cavitating Flow on a Two-Dimensional Symmetrical Hydrofoil and Comparison to Experiment,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129, pp. 279–292. [CrossRef]
Dular, M., Bachert, R., Stoffel, D., and Sirok, B., 2004, “Experimental Evaluation of Numerical Simulation of Cavitating Flow Around Hydrofoil,” Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids, 24, pp. 522–538. [CrossRef]
Zhou, L., and Wang, Z., 2008, “Numerical Simulations of Cavitation Around a Hydrofoil and Evaluation of a RNG k-ε Model,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130, pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
Mehta, R. D., and Bradshaw, P., 1979, “Design Rules for Small Low-Speed Wind Tunnels,” Aero J. Roy. Aeronaut. Soc., 73, pp. 443–449.
Govindarajulu, D., Arakeri, V. H., Soundranayagam, S., Rao, G. N. V., and Ramaprasad, 1984. Hydrodynamic Design of a High Speed Cavitation Tunnel,” Tech. rep., NSTL/CSIC/CP 35 TR 84.1 IISc Bangalore, India.
Beaudoin, J., Cador, O., Aider, J., Gosse, K., Paranthoen, P., Hamelin, B., Tissier, M., Allano, D., Mutabazi, I., Gonzales, M., and Wesfreid, J., 2004, “Cavitation as a Complementary Tool for Automative Aerodynamics,” Experiments Fluids, 37, pp. 763–768. [CrossRef]
Reisman, G., 1997, “Dynamic, Acoustics and Control of Cloud Cavitation on Hydrofoil,” Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
Kline, S. J., and McClintock, F. A., 1953, “Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments,” Mech. Eng., 75, pp. 3–8.
Moffat, R. J., 1988, “Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results,” Experiment. Therm. Fluid Sci., pp. 3–17. [CrossRef]
Prem Kumar, T. M., 2012, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Non-Cavitating and Cavitating Flows Over S-Shaped Hydrofoil,” Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India.
ANSYS-Fluent, 2010, Reference Manual, 6.2.16 ed. Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH.
Sauer, J., and Schnerr, G. H., 2001, “Physical and Numerical Modeling of Unsteady Cavitation Dynamics.” In Fourth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, New Orleans, LA.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Taylor & Francis, New York.
Versteeg, H. K., and Malalasekera, W., 1995, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, Longman Scientific & Technical, London.
Blake, W., 1986, Mechanics of Flow-Induced Sound and Vibration, Vol. I & II, Academic Press Inc, London.
Brennen, C., 1994, Hydrodynamics of Pumps, Oxford Science Publication, Oxford, UK.
Reisman, G. E., Wang, Y. C., and Brennen, C. E., 1998, “Observations of Shock Waves in Cloud Cavitation,” J. Fluid Mech., 355, pp. 255–283. [CrossRef]
Hutton, S. P., 1986, “Studies of Cavitation Erosion and Its Relation to Cavitating Flow Patterns,” Proc. Int. Symp. Cavitation, Sendai, Japan, 1, pp. 21–29.
Arakeri, V. H., and Shanmuganathan, V., 1985, “On the Evidence for the Effect of Bubble Interference on Cavitation Noise,” J. Fluid Mech., 159, pp. 131–150. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of a S-shaped hydrofoils

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Schematic of cavitation test setup. (b) Schematic showing lighting arrangement and position of camera.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Computational grid with zoomed view near S-blade surface; (b) grid independent study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of (a) lift and (b) lift-to-drag ratio with different angles of attack under noncavitating condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variation of pressure coefficient over upper and lower surfaces for different angles of attack. (a) -6 deg, (b) -4 deg, (c) -2 deg, (d) 0 deg, (e) 2 deg, (f) 4 deg, and (g)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variation of Cτwx over upper and lower surfaces of S-shaped hydrofoil for different angles of attack

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of inception and desinence cavitation number for different angles of attack. Also shown are variations of -Cpmin and numerical predictions of cavitation inception.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variation of x-component of velocity, turbulent kinetic energy and vapor fraction at x/c = 0.125 for -6 deg angle of attack at σ/σi=0.3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of Reynolds number on cavitation inception

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Photograph of cavitation for different cavitation number at -6 deg angle of attack. (a) σ/σi = 1.00, (b) σ/σi = 0.63, (c) σ/σi = 0.44, (d) σ/σi = 0.17. Color maps indicate numerical vapor contour levels.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Frequency spectrum of variation of vapor fraction. Angle of attack is -6 deg at σ/σi = 0.3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Photograph of cavitation for different cavitation number at 6 deg angle of attack. (a) σ/σi = 0.74, (b) σ/σi = 0.48, (c) σ/σi = 0.28, (d) σ/σi = 0.07. Color maps indicate numerical vapor contour levels.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Photograph of cavitation for different cavitation number at 0 deg angle of attack. (a) σ/σi = 1.00, (b) σ/σi = 0.69. Color maps indicate numerical vapor contour levels.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Variation of (a) cavity length and (b) cavity thickness with cavitation number for different angles of attack

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Cavitation portrait chart indicating occurrences of different types of cavitation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Variation of RMS value of pressure fluctuation with cavitation number for different angles of attack

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison of experimental and numerical pressure fluctuations for angle of attack = -6 deg at σ/σi = 0.3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Spectral analysis of pressure fluctuation due to cavitation for different angles of attack

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Temporal variation and frequency domain analysis of unsteady (a) lift coefficient and (b) drag coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Prediction of lift coefficient (CL), drag coefficient (CD) for different angles of attack and cavitation number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Streamlines indicating extensive recirculation zone for angle of attack = -6 deg under noncavitating condition

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In