0
Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

Study of Erosive Cavitation Detection in Pump Mode of Pump–Storage Hydropower Plant Prototype

[+] Author and Article Information
Tine Cencîc

Sôske Elektrarne Nova Gorica,
5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia

Marko Hoĉevar, Brane Ŝirok

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Ljubljana,
1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 4, 2013; final manuscript received November 21, 2013; published online March 11, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Olivier Coutier-Delgosha.

J. Fluids Eng 136(5), 051301 (Mar 11, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1075; doi: 10.1115/1.4026476 History: Received February 04, 2013; Revised November 21, 2013

An experimental investigation has been made to detect cavitation in a pump–storage hydropower plant prototype suffering from leading edge cavitation in pump mode. Vibrations and acoustic emission on the housing of the turbine bearing and pressure fluctuations in the draft tube were measured and the corresponding signals were recorded and analyzed. The analysis was based on the analysis of high-frequency content of measured variables. The pump–storage hydropower plant prototype has been operated at various input loads and Thoma numbers. Several estimators of cavitation were evaluated according to a coefficient of determination between the Thoma number and cavitation estimators. The best results were achieved with a compound discharge coefficient cavitation estimator that is based on the discharge coefficient and several rms estimators: vibrations, acoustic emission, and pressure fluctuations. The compound discharge estimator was set as a product of the rms estimator and the squared discharge coefficient. Cavitation estimators were evaluated in several intervals of frequencies; the best frequency interval for the vibration sensor on the turbine cover was from 24 to 26 kHz, for the vibration sensor on the guide vane 36–40 kHz, for the acoustic emission sensor on the turbine cover 140–145 kHz, and for the pressure fluctuation sensor in the draft tube wall 130–150 kHz.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Escaler, X., Farhat, M., Ausoni, F., Egusqiza, E., and Avellan, F., 2006, “Cavitation Monitoring of Hydroturbines: Tests in a Francis Turbine Model,” Sixth International Symposium on Cavitation, Wagenigen, The Netherlands.
Rus, T., Hôcevar, M., Djelic, V., Ŝirok, B., and Kern, I., 1999, “Study of Topological Structures of Cavitation With Dynamical Analysis and Computer Aided Visualisation,” 20th IAHR, Brno, Czech Republic.
Dular, M., Ŝirok, B., Hôcevar, M., Kern, I., and Rus, T., 2007, “An Investigation of the Relationship Between Acoustic Emission, Vibration, Noise, and Cavitation Structures in a Kaplan Turbine,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129, pp. 1112–1122. [CrossRef]
Kern, I., Hôcevar, M., Novak, M., and Ŝirok, B., 1999, “Monitoring of the Cavitation in the Kaplan Turbine,” Industrial Electronics, ISIE.
Avellan, F., 2004, “Introduction to Cavitation in Hydraulic Machinery,” The 6th International Conference on Hydraulic Machinery and Hydrodynamics, Timisoara, Romania.
Egusquiza, E., Farhat, M., Avellan, F., Cussirat, M., and Escaler, X., 2006, “Detection of Cavitation in Hydraulic Turbines,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 20, pp. 983–1007. [CrossRef]
Bajic, B., 2002, “Multidimensional Diagnostics of Turbine Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124, pp. 943–950. [CrossRef]
Farhat, M., Egusquiza, E., Avellan, F., and Escaler, X., 2003, “Vibration Cavitation Detection Using Onboard Measurements,” Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation, Osaka, Japan, pp. 1–4.
Zhaohui, L., Xuezheng, C., and Qingfu Sun Huixuan, S., 2011, “Experimental Investigation on Cavitation in Large Kaplan Turbines,” Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, pp. 120–123.
Miyagawa, K., Komuro, T., Fukuda, H., and Maekawa, M., 2003, “Study of Cavitation Erosion on Hydraulic Turbine Runners,” Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation, Osaka, Japan.
S. C.Li, 2000, Cavitation of Hydraulic Machinery, Vol. 1 of Series on Hydraulic Machinery, Imperial College Press, London, Chap. 6.2.
International Electrotechnical Commission, 2004, “International standard 6069-1,” Geneva, Switzerland.
Laperrousaz, E., AvellanF., Dupont, Ph., Simoneau, R., Bourdon, P., and Dorey, J.-M., 1996, “Cavitation Erosion Prediction on Francis Turbines Part 3,” Method. Prediction, 1, pp. 564–573.
Liu, S., and Wang, S., 2007, “Cavitations Monitoring and Diagnosis of Hydropower Turbine on Line Based on Vibration and Ultrasound Acoustic,” Sixth international Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Hong Kong, China.
International Electretrotechnical Commission, 1999, “IEC 60193:1999,” Geneva, Switzerland.
Farhat, M., and Kaye, M., 2002, “Clasification of Cavitation in Hydraulic Machines Using Vibration Analysis,” Proceedings of the Hydraulic Machinery and Systems 21st IAHR Symposium.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The power house of pump–storage hydro power plant Avce

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematics of occurrence of cavitation on the prototype in pump mode: Area A (left), (right) the figure shows the cavitation erosion on the blades that had the highest cavitation erosion damage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Influence of the discharge value on the flow velocity triangle in pump mode of operation at the impeller inlet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Installation of sensors (detail 1 of the Fig. 1) showing (left) view from side and (right) view from top (AE acoustic emission sensor, ACC1 and ACC2 accelerometers 1 and 2, PS pressure sensor)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematics of a pump turbine Avce runner, draft tube, and downstream reservoir

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Results of measurements of vibrations, acoustic emission, and pressure fluctuations, showing dependence of measured variables on three intervals of discharge coefficients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Discharge coefficient cavitation estimator (DE) for different cavitation sensors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Normalized spectra of fluctuations of acceleration ACC1 and ACC2. Shown are five different intervals of frequencies.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Normalized spectra of fluctuations of accelerations AE and PS. Shown are five different intervals of frequencies.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Discharge coefficient cavitation estimator (DE) of accelerations ACC1 and ACC2 at selected frequency intervals. Shown is coefficient of determination R2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Discharge coefficient cavitation estimator (DE) of acoustic emission AE and pressure PS at selected frequency intervals. Shown is coefficient of determination R2.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In