0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Long-Period Pressure Pulsation Estimated in Numerical Simulations for Excessive Flow Rate Condition of Francis Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
Kenji Shingai

Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd.
832-2 Horiguchi, Hitachinaka-shi,
Ibaraki 312-0034, Japan
e-mail: kenji.shingai.vd@hitachi.com

Nobuaki Okamoto

Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc.,
2-5 Marunouchi, Takamatsu-shi,
Kagawa 760-8573, Japan

Yuta Tamura

Basic Engineering/Hydraulic Laboratory,
Hitachi Mitsubishi Hydro Co.,
3-2-1 Saiwai, Hitachi-shi,
Ibaraki 317-0073, Japan

Kiyohito Tani

Basic Engineering/Hydraulic Laboratory,
Hitachi Mitsubishi Hydro Co.,
3-2-1 Saiwai, Hitachi-shi,
Ibaraki 317-0073, Japan
e-mail: tani.kiyohito.rg@hm-hydro.com

1Present affiliation is Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd., Yokohama, Japan, e-mail: kenji_shingai@mhps.com

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 28, 2013; final manuscript received January 17, 2014; published online May 7, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Frank C. Visser.

J. Fluids Eng 136(7), 071105 (May 07, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1521; doi: 10.1115/1.4026584 History: Received August 28, 2013; Revised January 17, 2014

A series of numerical simulations for a Francis turbine were carried out to estimate the unsteady motion of the cavity in the draft tube of the turbine under a much larger flow rate condition than the swirl-free flow rate. The evaporation and condensation process was described by using a simplified Rayleigh–Plesset equation. A two-phase homogeneous model was adopted to calculate the mixture of gas and liquid phases. Instantaneous pressure monitored at a point on the draft tube formed long-period pulsations. Detailed analysis of the simulation results clarified the occurrence of a uniquely shaped cavity and the corresponding flow pattern in every period of the pressure pulsations. The existence of a uniquely shaped cavity was verified with an experimental approach. A simulation without rotor-stator interaction also obtained long-period pulsations after an extremely long computational time. This result shows that the rotor-stator interaction does not contribute to the excitation of long-period pulsations.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Chen, C., Nicolet, C., Yonezawa, K., Farhat, M., Avellan, F., and Tsujimoto, Y., 2008, “One-Dimensional Analysis of Full Load Draft Tube Surge,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130, p. 041106. [CrossRef]
Sick, M., Doerfler, P., Sallaberger, M., Lohmberg, A., and Casey, M., 2002, “CFD Simulation of the Draft Tube Vortex,” Proc. 21st IAHR Symp. Hydraulic Machinery & Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, Paper No. 32, pp. 1–9.
Ciocan, G. D., Iliescu, M. S., Vu, T. C., Nennemann, B., and Avellan, F., 2007, “Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of the FLINDT Draft Tube Rotating Vortex,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129, pp. 146–158. [CrossRef]
Iliescu, M. S., Ciocan, G. D., and Avellan, F., 2008, “Analysis of the Cavitating Draft Tube Vortex in a Francis Turbine Using Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Two-Phase Flow,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130, p. 021105. [CrossRef]
Neto, A. D. A., Jester-Zuerker, R., Jung, A., and Maiwald, M., 2012, “Evaluation of a Francis Turbine Draft Tube Flow at Part Load Using Hybrid RANS-LES Turbulence Modelling,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Env. Sci., 15, p. 062010. [CrossRef]
Kurokawa, J., Kajigaya, A., Matsui, J., and Imamura, H., 2000, “Suppression of Swirl in a Conical Diffuser by Use of J-Groove,” Proc. 20th IAHR Symp. Hydraulic Machinery & Systems, Charlotte, NC.
Susan-Resiga, R., Muntean, S., Vu, T. C., Ciocan, G. D., and Nennemann, B., 2006, “Jet Control of the Draft Tube Vortex Rope in Francis Turbines at Partial Discharge,” Proc. 23rd IAHR Symp. Hydraulic Machinery & Systems, Yokohama, Japan, Paper No. F192.
Kurokawa, J., Imamura, H., and Choi, Y. D., 2010, “Effect of J-Groove on the Suppression of Swirl Flow in a Conical Diffuser,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 132, p. 071101. [CrossRef]
Tanasa, C., Susan-Resiga, R., Bosioc, A., and Muntean, S., 2010, “Mitigation of Pressure Fluctuations in the Discharge Cone of Hydraulic Turbines Using Flow-Feedback,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Env. Sci., 12, p. 012067. [CrossRef]
Koutnik, J., Nicolet, C., Schohl, G. A., and Avellan, F., 2006, “Overload Surge Event in a Pumped-Storage Power Plant,” Proc. 23rd IAHR Symp. Hydraulic Machinery & Systems, Yokohama, Japan, Paper No. F135.
Alligné, S., Maruzewski, P., Dinh, T., Wang, B., Fedorov, A., Iosfin, J., and Avellan, F., 2010, “Prediction of a Francis Turbine Prototype Full Load Instability From Investigations on the Reduced Scale Model,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Env. Sci., 12, p. 012025. [CrossRef]
Dörfler, P. K., Keller, M., and Braun, O., 2010, “Francis Full-Load Surge Mechanism Identified by Unsteady 2-Phase CFD,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Env. Sci., 12, p. 012026. [CrossRef]
Chen, C., Nicolet, C., Yonezawa, K., Farhat, M., Avellan, F., Miyagawa, K., and Tsujimoto, Y., 2010, “Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of Cavity Oscillation in a Diffuser With Swirling Flow,” Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst., 3(1), pp. 80–90. [CrossRef]
Chen, C., Nicolet, C., Yonezawa, K., Farhat, M., Avellan, F., Miyagawa, K., and Tsujimoto, Y., 2010, “Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of Cavity Oscillation in a Conical Diffuser,” Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst., 3(1), pp. 91–101. [CrossRef]
Yonezawa, K., Konishi, D., Miyagawa, K., Avellan, F., Dorfler, P., and Tsujimoto, Y., 2012, “Cavitation Surge in a Small Model Test Facility Simulating a Hydraulic Power Plant,” Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst., 5(4), pp. 152–160. [CrossRef]
IEC 60193, 1999, “Hydraulic Turbines, Storage Pumps and Pump-Turbines—Model Acceptance Tests,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sheen, H. J., Chen, W. J., Jeng, S. Y., and Huang, T. L., 1996, “Correlation of Swirl Number for a Radial-Type Swirl Generator,” Experiment. Therm. Fluid Sci., 12, pp. 444–451. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R., 1994, “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1598–1605. [CrossRef]
Denton, J. D., and Singh, U. K., 1979, Time Marching Methods for Turbomachinery Flow Calculation: Application of Numerical Methods to Flow Calculations in Turbomachichines, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium.
Zwart, P. J., Gerber, A. G., and Belamri, T., 2004, “A Two-Phase Flow Model for Predicting Cavitation Dynamics,” Proc. International Conf. Multiphase Flow 2004, Yokohama, Japan, Paper No. 152.
Brennen, C. E., 2005, Fundamentals of Multiphase Flows, Cambridge, New York, pp. 220–221.
Ishii, M., and Hibiki, T., 2011, Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, pp. 393–395.
Kozubková, M., Rautová, J., and Bojko, M., 2012, “Mathematical Model of Cavitation and Modelling of Fluid Flow in Cone,” Procedia Eng., 39, pp. 9–18. [CrossRef]
Kato, C., 2011, “Industry-University Collaborative Project on Numerical Predictions of Cavitating Flows in Hydraulic Machinery: Part 1—Benchmark Test on Cavitating Hydrofoils,” Proc. ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Eng. Conf., Hamamatsu, Japan, pp. 445–453.
Morgut, M., and Nobile, E., 2012, “Numerical Predictions of Cavitating Flow Around Model Scale Propellers by CFD and Advanced Model Calibration,” Int. J. Rotating Machinery, 2012, p. 618180. [CrossRef]
Zobeiri, A., Kueny, J. L., Farhat, M., and Avellan, F., 2006, “Pump-Turbine Rotor-Stator Interactions in Generating Mode: Pressure Fluctuation in Distributor Channel,” Proc. 23rd IAHR Symp. Hydraulic Machinery & Systems, Yokohama, Japan, Paper No. F235.
Drtina, P., and Sallaberger, M., 1999, “Hydraulic Turbines—Basic Principles and State-of-the-Art Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications,” Proc. IMechE C, 213, pp. 85–102.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Meridional section of flow passage in the runner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Grid for rotor-stator interaction simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Grids for one component simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of turbine efficiencies obtained in RSI simulations and model test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Pressure pulsation estimated by RSI simulation in smaller flow rate Q/Qsf = 0.6217

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pressure pulsation estimated by RSI simulation in excessive flow rates Q/Qsf = 1.208

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Shapes of cavity, section velocity, and section static pressure profiles for smaller flow rate Q/Qsf = 0.6217

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Shapes of cavity, section velocity, and section static pressure profiles for excessive flow rate Q/Qsf=1.208

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Mass-weighted averaged velocity profiles at z* = -0.4894,-0.9351, and-1.418 in tn = 44.97 for the excessive flow rate Q/Qsf = 1.208

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Mass-weighted averaged velocity profiles at z* = -0.4894,-0.9351, and-1.418 in tn = 49.97 for the excessive flow rate Q/Qsf = 1.208

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

History of swirl intensity and lowest edge position of cavitation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure pulsation estimated by 1-C simulation in smaller flow rate Q/Qsf = 0.6217

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pressure pulsation estimated by 1-C simulation in excessive flow rates Q/Qsf = 1.208

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In