0
Technical Brief

Mechanism for Onset of Sudden-Rising Head Effect in Centrifugal Pump When Handling Viscous Oils

[+] Author and Article Information
Wen-Guang Li

Department of Fluid Machinery,
Lanzhou University of Technology,
287 Langongping Road,
Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China
e-mail: Liwg40@sina.com

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 3, 2013; final manuscript received February 15, 2014; published online May 6, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Satoshi Watanabe.

J. Fluids Eng 136(7), 074501 (May 06, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1409; doi: 10.1115/1.4026882 History: Received July 03, 2013; Revised February 15, 2014

The “sudden-rising head effect” may be prevalent in the head curve when a centrifugal pump transports highly viscous liquids, but it is not well understood presently. To clarify this effect the hydraulic performance of centrifugal pump when handling water and viscous oils was evaluated numerically by using a CFD code. The “sudden-rising head effect” is confirmed to exist at a higher viscosity and a certain large surface roughness. The viscosity and roughness, which make a transition of boundary layer flow pattern in both the impeller and volute to the hydraulically smooth regime from the fully rough one, are responsible for the effect.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ippen, A. T., 1946, “The Influence of Viscosity on Centrifugal Pump Performance,”. Trans. ASME, 68, pp. 823–848.
Itaya, S., and Nishikawa, T., 1960, “Studies on the Volute Pump Handling Viscous Fluids,” Trans. JSME, 26, pp. 202–209. [CrossRef]
Kamimoto, G., Matsuoka, Y., and Shirai, H., 1959, “On the Flow in the Impeller of Centrifugal Type Hydraulic Machinery,” Trans. JSME, 25, pp. 383–388. [CrossRef]
Acosta, A. J., and Hollander, A., 1965, “Observations on the Performance of Centrifugal Pumps at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Pump Design, Testing and Operation, 12th–14th, Glasgow, UK, pp. 379–393.
Toykura, T., Kurokawa, J., and Kanemoto, T., 1979, “Improve the Performance of a Centrifugal Pump Handling High Viscosity Liquids,” Turbomachinery, 7, pp. 72–79.
Aoki, K., Yamamoto, T., Ohta, H., and Nakayama, Y., 1985, “Study on Centrifugal Pump for high Viscosity Liquids,” Trans. JSME Ser. B, 51, pp. 2753–2758. [CrossRef]
Tanaka, K., and Ohashi, H., 1984, “Performance of Centrifugal Pumps at Low Reynolds Number,” Trans. JSME Ser. B, 50, pp. 279–285. [CrossRef]
Ohta, H., and Aoki, K., 1990, “Study on Centrifugal Pump for High Viscosity Liquids (Effect of Impeller Blade Number on the Pump Performance),” Trans. JSME Ser. B, 56, pp. 1702–1707. [CrossRef]
Toykura, T., Kurokawa, J., Kanemoto, T., and Masuda, K., 1980, “Performance of a Centrifugal Pump With Non-Clog Type of Impeller Using a High Viscosity Liquid,” Turbomachinery, 8, pp. 100–104.
Ohta, H., Aoki, K., and Yamamoto, T., 1985, “Study on Centrifugal Pump for High Viscosity Liquids (Effect of Clearance Ratio),” Trans. JSME Ser. B, 51, pp. 4295–4300. [CrossRef]
Li, W.-G., and Hu, Z.-M., 1996, “Experiments on the Performance of a Centrifugal Oil Pump,” Fluid Mach., 25, pp. 3–8.
Li, W.-G., 2000, “The Sudden-rising Head Effect in Centrifugal Oil Pumps,” World Pumps, 409, pp. 34–36.
Li, W.-G., 2011, “Effect of Exit Blade Angle, Viscosity and Roughness in Centrifugal Pumps Investigated by CFD Computation,” TASK Quarterly, 5, pp. 21–41.
Li, W.-G., 2013, “Model of Flow in Side Chambers of Industrial Centrifugal Pump for Delivering Viscous Oil,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(5), p. 051201. [CrossRef]
Dick, E., Vierendeels, J., Serbrugyns, A., and Voorde, J. V., 2001, “Performance Prediction of Centrifugal Pumps with CFD-Tools,” TASK Quarterly, 5, pp. 579–594.
Luo, J. Y., Issa, R. I., and Gosman, A. D., 1994, “Prediction of Impeller-Induced Flows in Mixing Vessels Using Multiple Frames of Reference,” Proceeding of the 8th Europe Conference on Mixing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 549–556.
Acharya, M., Bornstein, J., and Escudier, M. P., 1986, “Turbulent Boundary Layers on Rough Surfaces,” Exp. Fluids, 4, pp. 33–47. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V., and Spalding, D. B., 1972, “A Calculation Procedure for Heat and Mass Transfer in Three Dimensional Parabolic Flows,” Int. J. Heat and Mass Transf., 15, pp. 1787–1806. [CrossRef]
Cebeci, T., and Bradshaw, P., 1977, Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers, Hemisphere Publishing, Washington, DC.
Shirakura, M., 1959, “Effects of Surface Roughness of Impeller Channel on Volute-Pump Performance,” J. JSME, 62, pp. 890–899.
Masuda, K., 1979, “Influence of Clearance and Viscosity on Centrifugal Pump Performance,” Technical Note of the Port and Harbour Research Institute Ministry of Transort, Japan, No. 324.
Li, W.-G., 2011, “Unsteady Flow in a Viscous Oil Transporting Centrifugal Pump,” Central Eur. J. Eng., 1, pp. 361–368. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Fluid domain of centrifugal pump and definition of relative position between blade and volute tongue (a) fluid domain and (b) definition of relative position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Centrifugal pump performance curves at various angles of θ between blade 1 and tongue, (a) impeller theoretical head, (b) impeller hydraulic efficiency, (c) pump head, and (d) pump hydraulic efficiency, line, mean value of hydraulic parameter, symbols, and computed parameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Pump head and efficiency curves at various viscosities, (a) head and (b) efficiency, line, CFD results, symbols, and experimental data in [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Pump hydraulic efficiency and hydraulic loss coefficients of impeller and volute against flow rate at various viscosities, (a) hydraulic efficiency, (b) loss coefficient of impeller, and (c) loss coefficient of volute

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Pump head curves for two surface roughness at various viscosities, (a) Ra = 0 μm and (b) 100 μm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pump head curves at various viscosities for two turbulence models, (a) tetrahedral mesh with core hexahedral cells in blade mid-span plane, (b) head-flow rate curve for standard k-ɛ model, (c) head-flow rate curves for standard k-ω SST model, and (d) head-Reynolds number curves for standard k-ɛ model, symbols, and experimental data in [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Averaged skin friction factors versus flow rate at various viscosities, (a) in impeller and (b) in volute

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pump head and hydraulic efficiency against roughness at Q = 6.0 L/s and various viscosities, (a) head and (b) hydraulic efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Predicted hydraulic, volumetric, and mechanical efficiencies, as well as velocity profile in the side chambers at the BEP based on the experimental head-flow rate curve in [11], (a) various efficiencies predicted and (b) kf profile along the radius, ○, experimental pump efficiency, Δ, pump hydraulic efficiency predicted by CFD, lines, and variables predicted by the flow model in two side chambers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of head based on impeller torque in CFD, Euler head without slip factor correction, Euler head with slip factor correction, and pump head given by CFD at various impeller Reynolds number at BEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of head curves between CFD and experiment at 1 and 48 cSt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of blade profiles on shroud and hub surfaces that are designed and measured, lines, designed profiles, symbols, and measured profiles

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In