Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Drag-Reducing Flows in Laminar-Turbulent Transition Region

[+] Author and Article Information
Shu-Qing Yang, Donghong Ding

School of Civil, Mining
and Environmental Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering and Information Science,
University of Wollongong,
Northfields Avenue,
Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 22, 2013; final manuscript received April 13, 2014; published online July 24, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Mark F. Tachie.

J. Fluids Eng 136(10), 101202 (Jul 24, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1035; doi: 10.1115/1.4027455 History: Received January 22, 2013; Revised April 13, 2014

This study makes an attempt to investigate Newtonian/non-Newtonian pipe flows in a laminar-turbulent transition region, which is an extraordinarily complicated process and is not fully understood. The key characteristic of this region is its intermittent nature, i.e., the flow alternates in time between being laminar or turbulent in a certain range of Reynolds numbers. The physical nature of this intermittent flow can be aptly described with the aid of the intermittency factor γ, which is defined as that fraction of time during which the flow at a given position remains turbulent. Spriggs postulated that a weighting factor can be used to calculate the friction factor, applying its values in laminar and turbulent states. Based on these, a model is developed to empirically express the mean velocity and Reynolds shear stress in the transition region. It is found that the intermittency factor can be used as a weighting factor for calculating the flow structures in the transition region. Good agreements can be achieved between the calculations and experimental data available in the literature, indicating that the present model is acceptable to express the flow characteristics in the transition region.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Reynolds, O., 1883, “An Experimental Investigation of the Circumstances Which Determine Whether the Motion of Water Shall Be Direct or Sinuous, and of the Law of Resistance in Parallel Channels,” Proc. R. Soc. London, 35(224–226), pp. 84–99. [CrossRef]
Schlichting, H., 1979, Boundary Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 452.
Wygnanski, I., and Champagne, F., 1973, “On Transition in a Pipe. Part 1. The Origin of Puffs and Slugs and the Flow in a Turbulent Slug,” J. Fluid Mech., 59(02), pp. 281–335. [CrossRef]
Wygnanski, I. J., Sokolov, M., and Friedman, D., 1975, “On Transition in a Pipe. Part 2. The Equilibrium Puff,” J. Fluid Mech., 69(02), pp. 283–304. [CrossRef]
Darbyshire, A., and Mullin, T., 1995, “Transition to Turbulence in Constant-Mass-Flux Pipe Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 289, pp. 83–114. [CrossRef]
Draad, A. A., Kuiken, G., and Nieuwstadt, F., 1998, “Laminar–Turbulent Transition in Pipe Flow for Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Fluids,” J. Fluid Mech., 377, pp. 267–312. [CrossRef]
Eliahou, S., Tumin, A., and Wygnanski, I., 1998, “Laminar–Turbulent Transition in Poiseuille Pipe Flow Subjected to Periodic Perturbation Emanating From the Wall,” J. Fluid Mech., 361, pp. 333–349. [CrossRef]
Hof, B., Juel, A., and Mullin, T., 2003, “Scaling of the Turbulence Transition Threshold in a Pipe,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 91(24), p. 244502. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Han, G., Tumin, A., and Wygnanski, I., 2000, “Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Poiseuille Pipe Flow Subjected to Periodic Perturbation Emanating From the Wall. Part 2. Late Stage of Transition,” J. Fluid Mech., 419, pp. 1–27. [CrossRef]
Ben-Dov, G., and Cohen, J., 2007, “Critical Reynolds Number for a Natural Transition to Turbulence in Pipe Flows,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(6), p. 064503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hof, B., van Doorne, C. W., Westerweel, J., Nieuwstadt, F. T., Faisst, H., Eckhardt, B., Wedin, H., Kerswell, R. R., and Waleffe, F., 2004, “Experimental Observation of Nonlinear Traveling Waves in Turbulent Pipe Flow,” Science, 305(5690), pp. 1594–1598. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Matas, J.-P., Morris, J. F., and Guazzelli, E., 2003, “Transition to Turbulence in Particulate Pipe Flow,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 90(1), p. 014501. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keefe, L., Moin, P., and Kim, J., 1992, “The Dimension of Attractors Underlying Periodic Turbulent Poiseuille Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 242, pp. 1–29. [CrossRef]
Karami, H., and Mowla, D., 2012, “Investigation of the Effects of Various Parameters on Pressure Drop Reduction in Crude Oil Pipelines by Drag Reducing Agents,” J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 177, pp. 37–45. [CrossRef]
RottaJ., 1956, “Experimenteller Beitrag zur Entstehung Turbulenter Strömung im Rohr,” Arch. Appl. Mech., 24(4), pp. 258–281.
Toms, B. A., 1948, “Some Observations on the Flow of Linear Polymer Solutions Through Straight Tubes at Large Reynolds Numbers,” Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Rheology, pp. 135–141.
Virk, P., 1971, “Drag Reduction in Rough Pipes,” J. Fluid Mech., 45(02), pp. 225–246. [CrossRef]
Virk, P., 1971, “An Elastic Sublayer Model for Drag Reduction by Dilute Solutions of Linear Macromolecules,” J. Fluid Mech., 45(03), pp. 417–440. [CrossRef]
Virk, P. S., 1975, “Drag Reduction Fundamentals,” AIChE J., 21(4), pp. 625–656. [CrossRef]
Virk, P. S., Merrill, E., Mickley, H., Smith, K., and Mollo-Christensen, E., 1967, “The Toms Phenomenon: Turbulent Pipe Flow of Dilute Polymer Solutions,” J. Fluid Mech., 30(02), pp. 305–328. [CrossRef]
Warholic, M., Massah, H., and Hanratty, T., 1999, “Influence of Drag-Reducing Polymers on Turbulence: Effects of Reynolds Number, Concentration and Mixing,” Exp. Fluids, 27(5), pp. 461–472. [CrossRef]
Den Toonder, J., Hulsen, M., Kuiken, G., and Nieuwstadt, F., 1997, “Drag Reduction by Polymer Additives in a Turbulent Pipe Flow: Numerical and Laboratory Experiments,” J. Fluid Mech., 337, pp. 193–231. [CrossRef]
Min, T., Yoo, J. Y., Choi, H., and Joseph, D. D., 2003, “Drag Reduction by Polymer Additives in a Turbulent Channel Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 486, pp. 213–238. [CrossRef]
Ptasinski, P., Nieuwstadt, F., Van Den Brule, B., and Hulsen, M., 2001, “Experiments in Turbulent Pipe Flow With Polymer Additives at Maximum Drag Reduction,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 66(2), pp. 159–182. [CrossRef]
Roy, A., and Larson, R. G., 2005, “A Mean Flow Model for Polymer and Fiber Turbulent Drag Reduction,” Appl. Rheol., 15(6), pp. 370–389. [CrossRef]
White, C., Somandepalli, V., and Mungal, M., 2004, “The Turbulence Structure of Drag-Reduced Boundary Layer Flow,” Exp. Fluids, 36(1), pp. 62–69. [CrossRef]
Esmael, A., Nouar, C., Lefèvre, A., and Kabouya, N., 2010, “Transitional Flow of a Non-Newtonian Fluid in a Pipe: Experimental Evidence of Weak Turbulence Induced by Shear-Thinning Behavior,” Phys. Fluids, 22, p. 101701. [CrossRef]
White, C. M., and Mungal, M. G., 2008, “Mechanics and Prediction of Turbulent Drag Reduction With Polymer Additives,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40, pp. 235–256. [CrossRef]
Yang, S.-Q., and Dou, G., 2005, “Drag Reduction in a Flat-Plate Boundary Layer Flow by Polymer Additives,” Phys. Fluids, 17(6), p. 065104. [CrossRef]
Yang, S.-Q., and Dou, G.-R., 2008, “Modeling of Viscoelastic Turbulent Flow in Channel and Pipe,” Phys. Fluids, 20(6), p. 065105. [CrossRef]
Yang, S.-Q., 2009, “Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow With Polymer Additives,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 131(5), p. 051301. [CrossRef]
Yang, S.-Q., and Dou, G., 2010, “Turbulent Drag Reduction With Polymer Additive in Rough Pipes,” J. Fluid Mech., 642, pp. 279–294. [CrossRef]
Yang, S.-Q., and Ding, D., 2013, “Drag Reduction Induced by Polymer in Turbulent Pipe Flows,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 102, pp. 200–208. [CrossRef]
L'vov, V. S., Pomyalov, A., Procaccia, I., and Tiberkevich, V., 2004, “Drag Reduction by Polymers in Wall Bounded Turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(24), p. 244503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Emmons, H. W., 2012, “The Laminar-Turbulent Transition in a Boundary Layer-Part I,” J. Aeronaut. Sci., 18(7), pp. 121–131.
Dou, G., 1996, “Basic Law in Mechanics of Turbulent Flows,” China Ocean Eng., 10, pp. 1–45.
Spriggs, H. D., 1973, “Comments on Transition From Laminar to Turbulent Flow,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund., 12(3), pp. 286–290. [CrossRef]
Lumley, J. L., 1969, “Drag Reduction by Additives,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 1(1), pp. 367–384. [CrossRef]
Yang, S.-Q., Lim, S.-Y., and McCorquodale, J., 2005, “Investigation of Near Wall Velocity in 3-D Smooth Channel Flows,” J. Hydraul. Res., 43(2), pp. 149–157. [CrossRef]
Yang, S.-Q., 2010, “Conditionally Averaged Turbulent Structures in 2D Channel Flow,” Proc. ICE—Water Manage., 163(2), pp. 79–88. [CrossRef]
Presti, F., 2000, “Investigation of Transitional and Turbulent Pipe Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Escudier, M., Presti, F., and Smith, S., 1998, “Drag Reduction in the Turbulent Pipe Flow of Polymers,” J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 81(3), pp. 197–213. [CrossRef]
Narayanan, M. A. B., and Narayana, T., 1967, “Some Studies on Transition From Laminar to Turbulent Flow in a Two-Dimensional Channel,” ZAMP, 18(5), pp. 642–650. [CrossRef]
Rao, G., 1974, “Mechanics of Transition in an Axisymmetric Laminar Boundary Layer on a Circular Cylinder,” ZAMP, 25(1), pp. 63–75. [CrossRef]
Narasimha, R., 1985, “The Laminar-Turbulent Transition Zone in the Boundary Layer,” Prog. Aerospace Sci., 22(1), pp. 29–80. [CrossRef]
Wójs, K., 1993, “Laminar and Turbulent Flow of Dilute Polymer Solutions in Smooth and Rough Pipes,” J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 48(3), pp. 337–355. [CrossRef]
Peixinho, J., Nouar, C., Desaubry, C., and Théron, B., 2005, “Laminar Transitional and Turbulent Flow of Yield Stress Fluid in a Pipe,” J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 128(2), pp. 172–184. [CrossRef]
Dou, G., and Wang, G., 1988, “The Turbulence Structure of a Viscoelastic Fluid by Dilute Solution of Linear Macromolecules in the Interim State From Laminar Flow to Turbulent Flow,” J. Nanjing Hydraul. Res., 3, pp. 1–14.
Jiménez, J., and Pinelli, A., 1999, “The Autonomous Cycle of Near-Wall Turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 389, pp. 335–359. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Measured (symbols) and calculated (lines) velocity profiles in laminar, transition, and turbulent flow regions. For Re = 640, glucose syrup, γ¯t = 0 and D* = 1; for Re = 2700, 0.4% CMC, γ¯t = 0.75 and D* = 1.03; for Re = 3840, 0.2% PAA, γ¯t = 0.85 and D* = 1.09; for Re = 6600, 0.14% Carbopol 934, γ¯t = 0.99 and D* = 1.29; and for Re = 45,300, 0.09% CMC/0.09%XG, γ¯t = 1 and D* = 1.56.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of weighting factor determined from the measured friction factor with the intermittency factor, i.e., Eq. (10) and its modified form Eq. (21)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Friction factor versus Reynolds number in laminar-turbulent transition region based on Wójs's experimental data [46]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Friction factor versus Reynolds number based on Peixinho et al.'s [47] measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Friction factor versus Reynolds number in laminar-turbulent transition region based on Dou and Wang's [48] measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Turbulent intensity profiles measured by Peixinho et al. [47] and its comparison with Eq. (28)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Distribution of measured rms of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the laminar-turbulent transition region of Newtonian fluid flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Distribution of measured rms of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the laminar-turbulent transition region of drag-reducing flow




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In