Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

A Hybrid Compressible–Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics Method for Richtmyer–Meshkov Mixing

[+] Author and Article Information
Tommaso Oggian

Cranfield University,
Cranfield MK43 0AL,

Dimitris Drikakis

Cranfield University,
Cranfield MK43 0AL,
e-mail: d.drikakis@cranfield.ac.uk

David L. Youngs, Robin J. R. Williams

Aldermaston RG7 4PR,

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 4, 2013; final manuscript received April 17, 2014; published online July 9, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Oleg Schilling.

J. Fluids Eng 136(9), 091210 (Jul 09, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1218; doi: 10.1115/1.4027484 History: Received April 04, 2013; Revised April 17, 2014

This paper presents a hybrid compressible–incompressible approach for simulating the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) and associated mixing. The proposed numerical approach aims to circumvent the numerical deficiencies of compressible methods at low Mach (LM) numbers, when the flow has become essentially incompressible. A compressible flow solver is used at the initial stage of the interaction of the shock wave with the fluids interface and the development of the RMI. When the flow becomes sufficiently incompressible, based on a Mach number prescribed threshold, the simulation is carried out using an incompressible flow solver. Both the compressible and incompressible solvers use Godunov-type methods and high-resolution numerical reconstruction schemes for computing the fluxes at the cell interfaces. The accuracy of the model is assessed by using results for a two-dimensional (2D) single-mode RMI.

British Crown Owned Copyright 2014/AWE
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Volpe, G., 1993, “Performances of Compressible Flow Codes at Low Mach Number,” AIAA J., 31, pp. 49–56. [CrossRef]
Turkel, E., Fiterman, A., and Van Leer, B., 1994, Preconditioning and the Limit of the Compressible to the Incompressible Flow Equations for Finite Differences Schemes, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Guillard, H., and Murrone, A., 2004, “On the Behavior of Upwind Schemes in the Low Mach Number Limit: II. Godunov Type Schemes,” Comput. Fluids, 33, pp. 655–675. [CrossRef]
Guillard, H., and Viozat, C., 1999, “On the Behaviour of Upwind Schemes in the Low Mach Number Limit,” Comput. Fluids, 28, pp. 63–86. [CrossRef]
Thornber, B., Drikakis, D., Williams, R., and Youngs, D., 2008, “On Entropy Generation and Dissipation of Kinetic Energy in High-Resolution Shock-Capturing Schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., 227, pp. 4853–4872. [CrossRef]
Thornber, B., Mosedale, A., Drikakis, D., Youngs, D., and Williams, R., 2008, “An Improved Reconstruction Method for Compressible Flow With Low Mach Number Features,” J. Comput. Phys., 227, pp. 4873–4894. [CrossRef]
Drikakis, D., and Rider, W., 2004, High Resolution Methods for Incompressible and Low-Speed Flows, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Schnochet, S., 1994, “Fast Singular Limits of Hyperbolic PDEs,” J. Differential Eq., 114, pp. 476–512. [CrossRef]
Grenier, E., 1997, “Oscillatory Perturbations of the Navier-Stoke Equations,” J. Math. Pures Appl., 76, pp. 477–498. [CrossRef]
Sesterhenn, J., Müller, B., and Thomann, H., 1999, “On the Cancellation Problem in Calculating Compressible Low Mach Number Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 151, pp. 597–615. [CrossRef]
Klein, R., 1995, “Semi-Implicit Extension of a Godunov-Type Scheme Based on Low Mach Number Asymptotics I: One-Dimensional Flow,” J. Comput. Phys., 121, pp. 213–237. [CrossRef]
Roller, S., and Munz, C., 2000, “A Low Mach Number Scheme Based on Multi-scale Asymptotics,” Comput. Visual. Sci., 3, pp. 85–91. [CrossRef]
Schneider, T., Botta, N., Geratz, K., and Klein, R., 1999, “Extension of Finite Volume Compressible Flow Solvers to Multi-Dimensional, Variable Density Zero Mach Number Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 155, pp. 248–286. [CrossRef]
Thornber, B., and Drikakis, D., 2008, “Numerical Dissipation of Upwind Schemes in Low Mach Flow,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 56, pp. 1535–1541. [CrossRef]
Eberle, A., 1987, “Characteristic Flux Averaging Approach to the Solution of Euler's Equations,” Tech. Rep. Lecture Series 1987-04, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
Drikakis, D., and Tsangaris, S., 1991, “An Implicit Characteristic Flux Averaging Scheme for the Euler Equations for Real Gases,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 12, pp. 711–726. [CrossRef]
Zoltak, J., and Drikakis, D., 1998, “Hybrid Upwind Methods for the Simulation of Unsteady Shock-Wave Diffraction Over a Cylinder,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 162, pp. 165–185. [CrossRef]
Kim, K. H., and Kim, C., 2005, “Accurate, Efficient and Monotonic Numerical Methods for Multi-Dimensional Compressible Flows Part II: Multi-Dimensional Limiting Process,” J. Comput. Phys., 208, pp. 570–615. [CrossRef]
Rusanov, V. V., 1961, “Calculation of Interaction of Non-Steady Shock Waves With Obstacles,” USSR Comput. Math. & Math. Phys., 1, pp. 267–279.
Chorin, A., 1968, “Numerical Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations for an Incompressible Fluid,” Math. Comput., 22, pp. 745–762. [CrossRef]
Chorin, A. J., 1969, “On the Convergence of Discrete Approximations to the Navier-Stokes Equations,” Math. Comput., 23, pp. 341–353. [CrossRef]
Chorin, A. J., and Marsden, G., 1993, A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid-Mechanics, Springer, New York.
Van der Vorst, H., 1992, “Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Converging Variant of Bi-CG for the Solution of Nonsymmetric Linear Systems,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 13(2), pp. 631–644. [CrossRef]
Li, X. L., and Zhang, Q., 1997, “A Comparative Numerical Study of the Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability With Nonlinear Analysis in Two and Three Dimensions,” Phys. Fluids, 9(10), pp. 3069–3077. [CrossRef]
Melnikov, R., 1995, “Numerical Anomalies Mimicking Physical Effects,” Tech. Rep., Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Technical Report.
Aleshin, A. N., Gamali, E. G., Zaitsev, S. G., Lazareva, E. V., Lebo, I. G., and Rozanov, V. B., 1988, “Nonlinear and Transitional Stages in the Onset of the Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability,” Soviet Tech. Phys. Lett., 14, pp. 466–488.
Velikovich, A. L., and Dimonte, G., 1996, “Nonlinear Perturbation Theory of the Incompressible Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, pp. 3112–3115. [CrossRef]
Roache, P., 1998, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Publishers Socorro, New Mexico.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Grid convergence for a single-mode instability (H)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Absolute average value of velocity divergence at t > tNT≈0.052 s for C + LM and H solutions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Divergence of velocity along the central line (y = π) for C + LM (solid lines) and H (dashed lines) simulations at different time instants t > tNT. The mushroomlike interface between the fluids at each instant is displayed in the background of the graphs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Predicted growth of the single-mode instability using the compressible (C), compressible with low-Mach correction (C + LM), and hybrid (H) methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of volume fractions at different time instants for the C, C + LM, and H methods on grid G2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of volume fractions at different time instants for the C, C + LM, and H methods on grid G4




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In