Special Section Articles

Temperature and Entropy in Ideal Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence

[+] Author and Article Information
John V. Shebalin

Astromaterials Research Office,
NASA Johnson Space Center,
Houston, TX 77058
e-mail: john.v.shebalin@nasa.gov

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 27, 2012; final manuscript received July 24, 2013; published online April 28, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Ye Zhou.This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

J. Fluids Eng 136(6), 060901 (Apr 28, 2014) (5 pages) Paper No: FE-12-1479; doi: 10.1115/1.4025674 History: Received September 27, 2012; Revised July 24, 2013

Fourier analysis of incompressible, homogeneous magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence produces a model dynamical system on which to perform numerical experiments. Statistical methods are used to understand the results of ideal (i.e., nondissipative) MHD turbulence simulations, with the goal of finding those aspects that survive the introduction of dissipation. This statistical mechanics is based on a Boltzmannlike probability density function containing three “inverse temperatures,” one associated with each of the three ideal invariants: energy, cross helicity, and magnetic helicity. However, these inverse temperatures are seen to be functions of a single parameter that may defined as the “temperature” in a statistical and thermodynamic sense: the average magnetic energy per Fourier mode. Here, we discuss temperature and entropy in ideal MHD turbulence and their use in understanding numerical experiments and physical observations.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wootton, A. J. W., Tsui, H. Y., and Prager, S., 1992, “Edge Turbulence in Tokamaks, Stellarators and Reversed field pinches,” Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 34(13), pp. 2023–2030. [CrossRef]
Lielpeteris, J., and Moreau, R., 1989, Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Falgarone, E., and Passot, T., 2003, Turbulence and Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Jones, C. A., 2011, “Planetary Magnetic Fields and Fluid Dynamos,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 43, pp. 583–614. [CrossRef]
Lamb, H., 1932, Hydrodynamics, 6th ed., Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, p. 663.
Girimaji, S. S., and Zhou, Y., 1996, “Analysis and Modeling of Subgrid Scalar Mixing Using Numerical Data,” Phys. Fluids, 8(5), pp. 1224–1236. [CrossRef]
Lee, T. D., 1952, “On Some Statistical Properties of Hydrodynamical and Magneto-Hydrodynamical Fields,” Q. Appl. Math., 10(1), pp. 69–74.
Elsässer, W. M., 1956, “Hydromagnetic Dynamo Theory,” Rev. Modern Phys., 28(2), pp. 135–163. [CrossRef]
Woltjer, L., 1958, “A Theorem on Force-Free Magnetic Fields,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 44(6), pp. 489–491. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 2006, “Ideal Homogeneous Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in the Presence of Rotation and a Mean Magnetic Field,” J. Plasma Phys., 72(4), pp. 507–524. [CrossRef]
Kraichnan, R. H., 1973, “Helical Turbulence and Absolute Equilibrium,” J. Fluid Mech., 59(4), pp. 745–752. [CrossRef]
Frisch, U., Pouquet, A., Leorat, J., and Mazure, A., 1975, “Possibility of an Inverse Cascade of Magnetic Helicity in Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 68(4), pp. 769–778. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 1982, “Anisotropy in MHD Turbulence due to a Mean Magnetic Field,” Ph.D. thesis, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
Shebalin, J. V., 2009, “Plasma Relaxation and the Turbulent Dynamo,” Phys. Plasmas, 16(7), p. 072301. [CrossRef]
Orszag, S. A., and Patterson, G. S., 1972, “Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 28(2), pp. 76–79. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 2013, “Broken Ergodicity in Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence,” Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 107(4), pp. 411–466. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 1989, “Broken Ergodicity and Coherent Structure in Homogeneous Turbulence,” Physica D, 37, pp. 173–191. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 1994, “Broken Symmetry in Ideal Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence,” Phys. Plasmas, 1(3), pp. 541–547. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 2007, “Broken Symmetries and Magnetic Dynamos, Phys. Plasmas, 14(10), p. 102301. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 2008, “The Homogeneous Turbulent Dynamo,” Phys. Plasmas, 15(2), p. 022305. [CrossRef]
Palmer, R. G., 1982, “Broken Ergodicity,” Adv. Phys., 31(6), pp. 669–735. [CrossRef]
Khinchin, A. I., 1949, Mathematical Foundations of Statistical Mechanics, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, pp. 137–145.
Shebalin, J. V., 1996, “Absolute Equilibrium Entropy,” J. Plasma Phys., 56(3), pp. 419–426. [CrossRef]
Taylor, J. B., 1974, “Relaxation of Toroidal Plasma and Generation of Reverse Magnetic Fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 33(19), pp. 1139–1141. [CrossRef]
Shebalin, J. V., 2013, “Broken Ergodicity, Magnetic Helicity and the MHD Dynamo,” Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 107(3), pp. 353–375. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Phase plots of (a) u˜1,2(1,0,0) and (b) b˜1,2(1,0,0) for 643 MHD run 1a from Ref. [19] (• represents an initial point and + represents the origin; trajectories run from t=0 to 200)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Phase path for (a) v˜1,2(1,0,0) and (b) v˜3,4(1,0,0) for 643 ideal MHD run 1a from Ref. [19]. These curves come from applying Eqs. (22)–(25) to data shown in Fig. 1.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In