0
Special Section Articles

Partially-Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations of High-Speed Mixing Environment

[+] Author and Article Information
Ravichandra Srinivasan

Research Associate
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: rsrinivasan@tamu.edu

Sharath S. Girimaji

Professor
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: girimaji@tamu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 18, 2012; final manuscript received December 8, 2013; published online April 28, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Ye Zhou.

J. Fluids Eng 136(6), 060903 (Apr 28, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: FE-12-1641; doi: 10.1115/1.4026234 History: Received December 18, 2012; Revised December 08, 2013

Accurate simulation of the fuel-air mixing environment is crucial for high-fidelity scramjet calculations. We compute the velocity fields of jet into supersonic freestream flow and cavity flow typical of scramjet flame-holding applications at different scale resolutions using the partially-averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) method. We present a sequence of variable resolution computations to demonstrate the potential of PANS method for high-speed mixing environment calculations.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Subsonic backward-facing step. Recovery of the prespecified level of viscosity reduction.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Subsonic backward-facing step. Length scale distribution at different fks. DNS data from decaying isotropic turbulence also shown for comparison.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Mach 5 case: DES and PANS simulations of jet in cross-stream

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Mach 5 case: Observed flow structures in experiments, DES, and PANS simulations. (a) Injector seed particles show eddy structures in the shear layer (Bowersox, Fan, and Lee [14]). (b) Transient DES results do not resolve these eddies. (c) Eddy formation observed in PANS with fk=0.35. (d) More resolved eddies seen in PANS results with fk=0.20.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Mach 2 case: DES and PANS simulations of jet in cross-stream

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Mach 2 case: Observed flow structures in experiments, DES, and PANS simulations. (a) NO PLIF image shows eddy structures in the shear layer [18]. (b) DES results show corresponding eddy structure. (c) PANS with fk=0.35 does not resolve these structures. (d) PANS with fk=0.20 is comparable to DES in the shear layer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Mach 5 case: Pitot pressure comparison of experimental and DES results at z/deff=8.0. The left half of the image corresponds to simulation results and the right half is from experiments.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Mach 5 case: Line plot at z/deff=8.0 for pitot pressure for RANS, DES, and experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cavity flow: centerline mean velocity profiles, zero-transport model, clustered grid. RANS, LES, and PANS comparison against experimental data.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Unsteady RANS and PANS vorticity contours

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In