0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Active Control of a Backward Facing Step Flow With Plasma Actuators

[+] Author and Article Information
Juan D'Adamo

CONICET
Facultad de Ingenieria,
Universidad de Buenos Aires,
Buenos Aires, Argentina
e-mail: jdadamo@fi.uba.ar

Roberto Sosa, Guillermo Artana

CONICET
Facultad de Ingenieria,
Universidad de Buenos Aires,
Buenos Aires, Argentina

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 23, 2013; final manuscript received April 30, 2014; published online September 10, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Mark R. Duignan.

J. Fluids Eng 136(12), 121105 (Sep 10, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1519; doi: 10.1115/1.4027598 History: Received August 23, 2013; Revised April 30, 2014

Active control over a backward facing step flow is studied experimentally by means of plasma based devices. The Reynolds number based on the step height h is 1520. An electrohydrodynamic actuator (EHD), dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) type, is flush mounted to the step wall. The DBD configuration adds momentum locally, normal to the separated shear layer, thus producing strong modifications downstream. The actuation is periodic and its frequency and amplitude are scrutinized to characterize the flow behavior under forcing. Measures of velocity fields for these flows are obtained from particle image velocimetry (PIV). As reported by previous works, the reattachment length shows an important reduction for an optimum forcing frequency. This value closely matches the shear layer flow natural frequency. On the other hand, the flow is less sensitive to the forcing amplitude though the analysis allows us to optimize the actuation in order to save power consumption.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Outline of the test section geometry and position of the DBD actuator. The imaging region is represented schematically by the laser sheet. (b) Detail of the DBD plasma actuator. (c) Scheme of the burst modulation signal mode.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Time averaged velocity modulus contours for the forcing jet produced by the DBD actuator (ff = 10Hz, DC = 50%). Induced flow rate G has been calculated through the plane marked with the dashed line.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Contour of the velocity modulus U/U∞ and streamlines for the nonforced mean flow for Re = 1520. The recirculation length xr≃5.70h.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Symbols • represent the recirculation region length for different Re numbers for nonforced flow. Symbol ★ stands for the selected case to be controlled.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Dashed line: Power spectrum signal for ux estimated from a Pitot probe located at x/h = 4. Solid line: The same data smoothed.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Symbols: PIV mean velocity profiles u¯x(y) for different positions x/h. Solid lines: Data is fit by f(y) = c1+c2*tanh(c3*y+c4).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Linear stability analysis on experimental mean flow for the nonforced case, at Re = 1520. The selected frequency in (d) fn = 9.8 Hz matches the Pitot measures.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Recirculation bubble length xr modifications under actuation for three forcing amplitudes and a range of frequencies 0.1<f+<3.4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Evolution of the mean flow, represented by contours of the nondimensional velocity modulus U/U∞ and streamlines. Different forcing frequencies are considered.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Momentum thickness evolution downstream. Nonforced case and three forcing frequencies for a fixed forcing amplitude (%DC = 25). Dashed lines show the corresponding recirculation length for each case.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Momentum thickness evolution downstream. Nonforced case and three forcing amplitudes for a fixed forcing frequency f+ = 1.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Instantaneous vorticity contours for the natural flow and three forcing frequencies for DC = 50%. Some Q contours (solid lines) identify the main vortex of the flow. Formation length is appreciable as well as an approximate measure for the wavelength λ.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Instantaneous vorticity contours for the more unstable mode of the linear stability problem for the nonforced case. Experimental scales δω and Um are used on Eq. (7).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In