0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Steady and Pulsating Turbulent Flows in Complex Pipe Geometries

[+] Author and Article Information
Simone Colonia

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Università “La Sapienza”,
Via Eudossiana 18,
Roma 00184, Italy

Giovanni P. Romano

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Università “La Sapienza”,
Via Eudossiana 18,
Roma 00184, Italy
e-mail: giampaolo.romano@uniroma1.it

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 14, 2013; final manuscript received June 5, 2014; published online September 4, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Peter Vorobieff.

J. Fluids Eng 136(11), 111201 (Sep 04, 2014) (15 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1318; doi: 10.1115/1.4027825 History: Received May 14, 2013; Revised June 05, 2014

In this paper, measurements of velocity and stress fields in rigid pipes are performed by means of planar particle image velocimetry (PIV). The attention is focused onto the effect of Reynolds number and of continuous or pulsating flows by investigating pipe geometries ranging from the straight pipe to the reduced section and bifurcated ones. The obtained results show that, in the tested range, the effect of Reynolds number is limited for straight and reduced section pipes, while significant for the bifurcated one. Independently of Reynolds number, different geometries and forcing (continuous or pulsed) produce strong variations in intensity and spatial distribution of velocity and stress fields. Considering the latter, the contribution of viscous and turbulent stresses are measured separately and compared. Indeed turbulent stresses are always larger than the viscous ones, but the relative intensity is highly variable as also the spatial distribution of maxima and minima. Specifically, in the pulsating flows, this distribution is phase-dependent reflecting the oscillations of regions of flow separation which form especially in reduced section and bifurcated pipes. These results are useful for all engineering applications in which turbulent pipe flows are involved.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Taylor, C. A., and Draney, M. T., 2004, “Experimental and Computational Methods in Cardiovascular Fluid Mechanics,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, pp. 197–231. [CrossRef]
Taylor, C. A., and Figueroa, C. A., 2009, “Patient-Specific Modeling of Cardiovascular Mechanics,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 11, pp. 109–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figueroa, C. A., Vignon-Clementel, I. E., Jansen, K. E., Hughes, T. J. R., and Taylor, C. A., 2006, “A Coupled Momentum Method for Modeling Blood Flow in Three-Dimensional Deformable Arteries,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 195(41–43), pp. 5685–5706. [CrossRef]
Moayeri, M. S., and Zendehbudi, G. R., 2003, “Effects of Elastic Property of the Wall on Flow Characteristics Through Arterial Stenoses,” J. Biomech., 36(4), pp. 525–535. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scotti, A., and Piomelli, U., 2000, “Numerical Simulation of Pulsating Turbulent Channel Flow,” Phys. Fluids, 13(5), pp. 1367–1384. [CrossRef]
Bhaganagar, K., 2008, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Flow in Channel With Rough Walls,” Phys. Fluids, 20(10), p. 101508. [CrossRef]
Carpinlioglu, M. O., and Gundogdu, M. Y., 2001, “A Critical Review on Pulsatile Pipe Flow Studies Directing Towards Future Research Topics,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 12(3), pp. 163–174. [CrossRef]
Peacock, J., Jones, T., Tock, C., and Lutz, R., 1998, “The Onset of Turbulence in Physiological Pulsatile Flow in a Straight Tube,” Exp. Fluids, 24(1), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Grigioni, M., Daniele, C., D'Avenio, G., and Barbaro, V., 1999, “A Discussion on the Threshold Limit for Hemolysis Related to Reynolds Shear Stress,” J. Biomech., 32(10), pp. 1107–1112. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Grigioni, M., Daniele, C., Davenio, G., and Barbaro, V., 2000, “On the Mono-Dimensional Approach to the Estimation of the Highest Reynolds Shear Stress in a Turbulent Flow,” J. Biomech., 33(6), pp. 701–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Balducci, A., Grigioni, M., Querzoli, G., Romano, G. P., Daniele, C., D'Avenio, G., and Barbaro, V., 2004, “Investigation of the Flow Field Downstream of an Artificial Heart Valve by Means of PIV and PTV,” Exp. Fluids, 36(1), pp. 204–213. [CrossRef]
Païdoussis, M. P., 1989, “Chaotic Oscillations of the Autonomous System of a Constrained Pipe Conveying Fluid,” J. Sound Vib., 135(1), pp. 1–19. [CrossRef]
Truesdell, R. A., Vorobieff, P. V., Sklar, L. A., and Mammoli, A. A., 2003, “Mixing of a Continuous Flow of Two Fluids Due to Unsteady Flow,” Phys. Rev. E, 67(6), p. 066304. [CrossRef]
Goullet, A., Glasgow, I., and Aubry, N., 2006, “Effects of Microchannel Geometry on Pulsed Flow Mixing,” Mech. Res. Commun., 33(5), pp. 739–746. [CrossRef]
Clark, C., 1976, “The Fluid Mechanics of Aortic Stenosis. I. Theory and Steady Flow Experiments,” J. Biomech., 9(8), pp. 521–528. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Clark, C., 1976, “The Fluid Mechanics of Aortic Stenosis. I. Unsteady Flow Experiments,” J. Biomech., 9(9), pp. 567–573. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yousif, M. J., Holdsworth, D. W., and Poepping, T. L., 2011, “A Blood-Mimicking Fluid for Particle Image Velocimetry With Silicone Vascular Models,” Exp. Fluids, 50(3), pp. 769–774. [CrossRef]
Oertel, H., 2010, “Biofluid Mechanics,” Prandtl Essentials of Fluid Mechanics, Springer, New York, Chap. XII.
Deshpande, M. D., and Giddens, D. P., 1980, “Turbulence Measurements in a Constricted Tube,” J. Fluid Mech., 97(1), pp. 65–89. [CrossRef]
Zendehbudi, G. R., and Moayeri, M. S., 1999, “Comparison of Physiological and Simple Pulsatile Flows Through Stenosed Arteries,” J. Biomech., 32(9), pp. 959–965. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fernandez, R. C., De Witt, K. J., and Botwin, M. R., 1976, “Pulsatile Flow Through a Bifurcation With Applications to Arterial Disease,” J. Biomech., 9(9), pp. 575–580. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nabavi, M., and Siddiqui, K., 2010, “A Critical Review on Advanced Velocity Measurement Techniques in Pulsating Flows,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 21(4), p.042002. [CrossRef]
Querzoli, G., Falchi, M., and Romano, G. P., 2010, “On the Flow Field Generated by a Gradually Varying Flow Through an Orifice,” Eur. J. Mech., 29(4), pp. 259–268. [CrossRef]
Bhaganagar, K., 2009, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Flow in Stenotic Channel to Understand the Effect of Stenotic Morphology on Turbulence,” J. Turb., 10(41). [CrossRef]
Manosh, C. P., Molla, M. M., and Roditi, G., 2009, “Large–Eddy Simulation of Pulsatile Blood Flow,” Med. Eng. Phys., 31, pp. 153–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mi, J., Nobes, D. S., and Nathan, G. J., 2001, “Influence of Jet Exit Conditions on the Passive Scalar Field of an Axisymmetric Free Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 432, pp. 91–125.
Munson, B. R., Young, D. F., and Okiishi, T. H., 1998, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 3rd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 483–488.
Gerrard, J. H., 1971, “An Experimental Investigation of the Pulsating Turbulent Water Flow in a Tube,” J. Fluid Mech., 46(1), pp. 43–64. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The straight, reduced section and bifurcated pipes (made by Pyrex glass) used in the present experiments with characteristic size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The experimental setup for the continuous (at the top) and pulsatile flows (at the bottom). A photograph of the circular pipe inserted into the test section is given on the right.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The forcing piston position and velocity curves for the pulsatile conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Average vector field (at the top left), velocity profile comparisons (at the top right), and axial behavior of flow rate (at the bottom). Continuous flow in the straight pipe at two Reynolds numbers.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Average vector field (at the top left), velocity profile comparisons (at the top right), and axial behavior of centerline velocity (at the bottom). Continuous flow in the reduced section pipe at two Reynolds numbers and comparisons with data by Deshpande and Gibbons [19] at Re = 5000.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Average vector field (at the top) and axial behavior of flow rate in the two branches (at the bottom). Continuous flow in the bifurcated pipe at two Reynolds numbers.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Rms values of the horizontal velocity component for the three tested pipe geometries. Continuous flow at Re = 3500 and Re = 7000 (only for the bifurcated pipe). Color scale in (m/s)2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Turbulent stresses u′v′ for the bifurcated pipe. Continuous flow at two Reynolds numbers. Color scale in (m/s)2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Total shear stress as a function of the radial coordinate at the end of the straight pipe. The continuous line represents the linear solution for pipe flows.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Viscous shear stresses for the three tested pipes. Continuous flow at Re = 3500 and Re = 7000 (only for the bifurcated pipe). Color scale in N/m2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Pulsating flow in the straight pipe: overlapping of profiles at different phases (at the top). Comparison with profiles reported by Oertel [18] (at the bottom).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pulsating flow in the straight pipe: at the top, flow reversal at phase number 2 (t/T ≈ 0), at the bottom at phase number 23 (t/T ≈ 0.4) as indicated at the top of the figure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Turbulent stresses u′v′ (on the left) and viscous stresses (on the right) for the straight pipe in the pulsating flow at three different phases (indicated at the top of each figure). Color scale in (m/s)2 (turbulent stresses) and N/m2 (viscous stresses).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Pulsating flow in the reduced section pipe: phases 2 and 24 as indicated at the top of each figure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Turbulent stresses u′v′ (on the left) and viscous stresses (on the right) for the reduced section pipe in the pulsating flow at three different phases (indicated at the top of each figure). Color scale in (m/s)2 (turbulent stresses) and N/m2 (viscous stresses).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Pulsating flow in the bifurcated pipe at phases indicated at the top of each figure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Turbulent stresses u′v′ (on the left) and viscous stresses (on the right) for the bifurcated pipe in the pulsating flow at three different phases (indicated at the top of each figure). Color scale in (m/s)2 (turbulent stresses) and N/m2 (viscous stresses).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In