0
Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

A Model for an Acoustically Driven Microbubble Inside a Rigid Tube

[+] Author and Article Information
Adnan Qamar

Mechanical Engineering Program,
Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering,
King Abdullah University of Science
and Technology (KAUST),
Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: adnan.qamar@kaust.edu.sa

Ravi Samtaney

Mechanical Engineering Program,
Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering,
King Abdullah University of Science
and Technology (KAUST),
Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: ravi.samtaney@kaust.edu.sa

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 14, 2014; final manuscript received August 14, 2014; published online September 10, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Daniel Maynes.

J. Fluids Eng 137(2), 021301 (Sep 10, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-14-1021; doi: 10.1115/1.4028337 History: Received January 14, 2014; Revised August 14, 2014

A theoretical framework to model the dynamics of acoustically driven microbubble inside a rigid tube is presented. The proposed model is not a variant of the conventional Rayleigh–Plesset category of models. It is derived from the reduced Navier–Stokes equation and is coupled with the evolving flow field solution inside the tube by a similarity transformation approach. The results are computed, and compared with experiments available in literature, for the initial bubble radius of Ro = 1.5 μm and 2 μm for the tube diameter of D = 12 μm and 200 μm with the acoustic parameters as utilized in the experiments. Results compare quite well with the existing experimental data. When compared to our earlier basic model, better agreement on a larger tube diameter is obtained with the proposed coupled model. The model also predicts, accurately, bubble fragmentation in terms of acoustic and geometric parameters.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Schrope, B. A., and Newhouse, V. L., 1993, “Second Harmonic Ultrasonic Blood Perfusion Measurement,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 19(7), pp. 567–579. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Simpson, D. H., Chin, C. T., and Burns, P. N., 1999, “Pulse Inversion Doppler: A New Method for Detecting Nonlinear Echoes From Microbubble Contrast Agents,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 46(2), pp. 372–382. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brock-Fisher, G., Poland, M. D., and Rafter, P. G., 1996, “Means for Increasing Sensitivity in Nonlinear Ultrasound Imaging Systems,” US Patent No. 5577505.
Dayton, P. A., and Ferrara, K., 2002, “Targeted Imaging Using Ultrasound,” J. Magn. Resonan. Imaging, 16(4), pp. 362–377. [CrossRef]
Klibanov, A. L., 2006, “Microbubble Contrast Agents: Targeted Ultrasound Imaging and Ultrasound-Assisted Drug-Delivery Applications,” Invest. Radiol., 41(3), pp. 354–362. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lanza, G. M., and Wickline, S. A., 2001, “Targeted Ultrasonic Contrast Agents for Molecular Imaging and Therapy,” Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., 44(1), pp. 13–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lindner, J. R., and Kaul, S., 2001, “Delivery of Drugs With Ultrasound,” Echocardiography, 18(4), pp. 329–337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bibra, H. V., Voigt, J. U., Froman, M., Bone, D., Wranne, B., and Juhlin-Dannfeldt, A., 1999, “Interaction of Microbubbles With Ultrasound,” Echocardiography, 16, pp. 733–741. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Unger, E. C., Matsunaga, T., McCreery, T., Schumann, P., Sweitzer, R., and Quigley, R., 2002, “Therapeutic Applications of Microbubbles,” Eur. J. Radiol., 42(s1), pp. 160–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ye, T., and Bull, J. L., 2004, “Direct Numerical Simulations of Micro-bubble Expansion in Gas Embolotherapy,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 126(6), pp. 745–759. [CrossRef]
Qamar, A., Wong, Z. Z., Fowlkes, J. B., and Bull, J. L., 2012, “Evolution of Acoustically Vaporized Microdroplets in Gas Embolotherapy,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134(3), p. 031010. [CrossRef]
Cosgrove, D., and Harvey, C., 2009, “Clinical Uses of Microbubbles in Diagnosis and Treatment,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 47(8), pp. 813–826. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ryu, K., Chung, S. K., and Cho, S. K., 2010, “Micropumping by an Acoustically Excited Oscillating Bubble for Automated Implantable Microfluidic Devices,” J. Assoc. Lab. Autom., 15(3), pp. 163–171. [CrossRef]
Rood, E. P., 2008, “Review-Mechanisms of Cavitation Inception,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 113(2), pp. 163–175. [CrossRef]
Leighton, T. G., 1994, The Acoustic Bubble, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 67–196.
Doinikov, A. A., and Bouakaz, A., 2011, “Review of Shell Models for Contrast Agent Microbubbles,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 58(5), pp. 981–993. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Caskey, C. F., Kruse, D. E., Dayton, P. A., Kitano, T. K., and Ferrara, K. W., 2006, “Microbubble Oscillation in Tubes With Diameters of 12, 25, and 195 Microns,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 88(3), p. 033902. [CrossRef]
Caskey, C. F., Kruse, D. E., Dayton, P. A., and Ferrara, K. W., 2005, “On the Oscillations of Microbubbles in Tubes With Diameters as Small as 12 Microns,” IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp., 2, pp. 854–857. [CrossRef]
Garbin, V., Cojoc, D., Ferrari, E., Di Fabrizio, E., Overvelde, M. L. J., Meer, van der Meer, S. M., de Jong, N., Lohse, D., and Versluis, M., 2007, “Changes in Microbubble Dynamics Near a Boundary Revealed by Combined Optical Micromanipulation and High-Speed Imaging,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90(11), p. 114103. [CrossRef]
Zheng, H., Dayton, P. A., Caskey, C., Zhao, S., Qin, S., and Ferrara, K. W., 2007, “Ultrasound-Driven Microbubble Oscillation and Translation Within Small Phantom Vessels,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 33(12), pp. 1978–1987. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Oguz, H. N., and Prosperetti, A., 1998, “The Natural Frequency of Oscillation of Gas Bubbles in Tubes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103(6), pp. 3301–3308. [CrossRef]
Chen, X. M., and Prosperetti, A., 1998, “Thermal Processes in the Oscillations of Gas Bubbles in Tubes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 104(3), pp. 1389–1398. [CrossRef]
Sassaroli, E., and Hynynen, K., 2005, “Resonance Frequency of Microbubbles in Small Blood Vessels: A Numerical Study,” Phys. Med. Biol., 50(22), pp. 5293–5305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Krasovitski, B., and Kimmel, E., 2001, “Gas Bubble Pulsation in a Semiconfined Space Subjected to Ultrasound,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109(3), pp. 891–898. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hu, Y. T., Qin, S., Hu, T., Ferrara, K. W., and Jiang, Q., 2005, “Asymmetric Oscillation of Cavitation Bubbles in a Microvessel and its Implications Upon Mechanisms of Clinical Vessel Injury in Shock-Wave Lithotripsy,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 40(2–3), pp. 341–350. [CrossRef]
Doinikov, A. A., and Bouakaz, A., 2013, “Ultrasonically Induced Dynamics of a Contrast Agent Microbubble Between Two Parallel Elastic Walls,” Phys. Med. Biol., 58(19), pp. 6797–6814. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Doinikov, A. A., and Bouakaz, A., 2011, “Acoustic Scattering From a Contrast Agent Microbubble Near an Elastic Wall of Finite Thickness,” Phys. Med. Biol., 56(21), pp. 6951–6967. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Doinikov, A. A., and Bouakaz, A., 2012, “Dynamics of a Contrast Agent Microbubble Attached to an Elastic Wall,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 31(3), pp. 654–662. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hay, T. A., Hamilton, M. F., Ilinskii, A., and Zabolotskaya, Z. A., 2012, “Model for Bubble Pulsation in Liquid Between Parallel Viscoelastic Layers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 132(1), pp. 124–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ye, T., and Bull, J. L., 2006, “Microbubble Expansion in a Flexible Tube,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 128(4), pp. 554–563. [CrossRef]
Qin, S. P., and Ferrara, K. W., 2006, “The Natural Frequency of Nonlinear Oscillation of Ultrasound Contrast Agents in Microvessels,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 128(7), pp. 1140–1148. [CrossRef]
Qin, S. P., Hu, Y. T., and Jiang, Q., 2006, “Oscillatory Interaction Between Bubbles and Confining Microvessels and its Implications on Clinical Vascular Injuries of Shockwave Lithotripsy,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 53(7), pp. 1322–1329. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qin, S. P., and Ferrara, K. W., 2006, “Acoustic Response of Compliable Microvessels Containing Ultrasound Contrast Agents,” Phys. Med. Biol., 51(20), pp. 5065–5088. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qamar, A., Samtaney, R., and Bull, J. L., 2013, “Dynamics of Micro-bubble Sonication Inside a Phantom Vessel,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 102(1), p. 013702. [CrossRef]
Pritchard, P. J., 2011, Fox and Mcdonald's Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
White, F., 2005, Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Mechanical Engineering, New York.
Brennen, C. E., 1995, Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics,” Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 47–75.
Snchez-sanz, M., and Blyth, M., 2007, “Unsteady Axisymmetric Stagnation Flow on a Circular Cylinder,” Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 60(2), pp. 125–138. [CrossRef]
Purohit, G., and Verma, R., 1992, “Unsteady Axisymmetric Stagnation Point Flow,” Fluid Dyn. Res., 10(3), pp. 193–198. [CrossRef]
Church, C. C., 1995, “The Effects of an Elastic Solid Surface Layer on the Radial Pulsations of Gas Bubbles,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 97(3), pp. 1510–1521. [CrossRef]
de Jong, N., Hoff, L., Skotland, T., and Bom, N., 1992, “Absorption and Scatter of Encapsulated Gas Filled Microspheres: Theoretical Considerations and Some Measurements,” Ultrasonics, 30(2), pp. 95–103. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the proposed coupled model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Maximum bubble radius as a function of PNP of acoustics for (a) Ro = 1.5 μm and (b) Ro = 2 μm for two vessel diameters. The basic model is the one proposed in Ref. [34].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Maximum bubble radius as a function of vessel length for Ro = 1.5 and 2 μm. The basic model is the one proposed in Ref. [34].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Spatial evolution of (a) F and (b) G at various time instance in an acoustic cycle for Ro = 2 μm, D = 200 μm, and PNP = 325

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Temporal evolution of F and G functions for (a) Ro = 1.5 μm, D = 12 μm, and PNP = 1350 kPa and (b) Ro = 1.5 μm, D = 200 μm, and PNP = 175 kPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Temporal evolution of bubble interface velocity (VB) and shear stress (Cf) for (a) Ro = 2 μm, D = 200 μm, and PNP 175 kPa and (b) Ro = 1.5 μm, D = 6 μm, and PNP = 1350 kPa

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In