0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Effect of Axial Clearance on the Efficiency of a Shrouded Centrifugal Pump

[+] Author and Article Information
Cao Lei

State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and
Engineering and Department of Thermal Engineering,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
e-mail: caolei613@126.com

Zhang Yiyang

China Water Resources Beifang Investigation,
Design and Research Co. Ltd.,
Tianjin 300222, China
e-mail: cherry_33@163.com

Wang Zhengwei

State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and
Engineering and Department of Thermal Engineering,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
e-mail: wzw@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

Xiao Yexiang

State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and
Engineering and Department of Thermal Engineering,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
e-mail: xiaoyex@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

Liu Ruixiang

CCCC Tianjin Dredging Co. Ltd.,
Binhai New Area,
Tianjin 300042, China
e-mail: yy850319@126.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 30, 2014; final manuscript received February 4, 2015; published online March 13, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Frank C. Visser.

J. Fluids Eng 137(7), 071101 (Jul 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: FE-14-1482; doi: 10.1115/1.4029761 History: Received August 30, 2014; Revised February 04, 2015; Online March 13, 2015

Clearance always exists between the rotating impeller shrouds and the stationary casing covers in shrouded centrifugal pumps, which affects the pump internal flow and performance. Model tests were conducted for a shrouded centrifugal pump with back blades on the front shroud, and the performance parameters were obtained for three different impeller axial positions. Adjusting the impeller axial position can change the axial size of both the front and back clearances simultaneously. The results show that a tiny variation of the axial clearance size can substantially change the pump performance. A large front clearance reduces the pump efficiency and head with little change in the shaft power. Numerical simulations for a wide range of operating conditions for the three models with different impeller axial positions using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) with shear stress transport (SST) k–ω turbulence model agree well with the experimental results. The numerical results show how the clearance flow interfere with the main flow as the axial clearance is varied. The change in the pump hydraulic efficiency, volumetric efficiency, and mechanical efficiency was analyzed for various clearances. The hydraulic efficiency is the lowest one of the three kinds of efficiency and changes dramatically as the flow rate increases; thus, the hydraulic efficiency plays a decisive role in the pump performance. The volumetric efficiency is most sensitive to the axial clearance, which obviously decreases as the front clearance is increased. Therefore, the volumetric efficiency is the key factor for the change of the gross efficiency as the axial clearance changes. The mechanical loss varies little with changes in both axial clearance and flow rate so the mechanical efficiency can be regarded as a constant. The effect of axial clearances on the efficiency of shrouded centrifugal pumps should be considered to enable more efficient designs.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Parts of the mesh in the impeller region and around the tongue of the volute casing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental performance curves for Cf0.22, Cf0.42, and Cf0.62

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of experimental and numerical results for the three models: (a) Cf0.22, (b) Cf0.42, (c) Cf0.62, and Cf0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Meridional velocity distributions on section B for: (a) section illustration, (b) Cf0.62, and (c) Cf0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Velocity distributions on the symmetry plane of the volute casing for: (a) Cf0.62 and (b) Cf0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Meridional velocity distribution on section B: (a) Cf0.22, (b) Cf0.42, and (c) Cf0.62

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Detailed views of the meridional velocity distributions on section B: (a) a_Cf0.22, (b) a_Cf0.42, (c) a_Cf0.62, (d) b_Cf0.22, (e) b_Cf0.42, (f) b_Cf0.62, (g) c_Cf0.22, (h) c_Cf0.42, and (i) c_Cf0.62

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Velocity distribution on the symmetry plane of the volute casing: (a) Cf0.22, (b) Cf0.42, and (c) Cf0.62

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Hydraulic efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Volumetric efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Mechanical efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison of hydraulic efficiency, volumetric efficiency, and mechanical efficiency

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In