0
Technical Brief

Flow Simulation of Jet Deviation by Rotating Pelton Buckets Using Finite Volume Particle Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Christian Vessaz

Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines,
EPFL,
Avenue de Cour 33bis,
Lausanne 1007, Switzerland
e-mail: christian.vessaz@epfl.ch

Ebrahim Jahanbakhsh

Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines,
EPFL,
Avenue de Cour 33bis,
Lausanne 1007, Switzerland
e-mail: ebrahim.jahanbakhsh@epfl.ch

François Avellan

Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines,
EPFL,
Avenue de Cour 33bis,
Lausanne 1007, Switzerland
e-mail: francois.avellan@epfl.ch

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received October 17, 2014; final manuscript received February 6, 2015; published online March 26, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Frank C. Visser.

J. Fluids Eng 137(7), 074501 (Jul 01, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: FE-14-1599; doi: 10.1115/1.4029839 History: Received October 17, 2014; Revised February 06, 2015; Online March 26, 2015

The objective of the present paper is to perform numerical simulations of a high-speed water jet impinging on rotating Pelton buckets using the finite volume particle method (FVPM), which combines attractive features of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and conventional grid-based finite volume. The particles resolution is first validated by a convergence study. Then, the FVPM results are validated with available measurements and volume of fluid (VOF) simulations. It is shown that the pressure field in the buckets inner wall is in good agreement with the experimental and numerical data and the evolution of the flow pattern matches the high-speed visualization.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Mack, R., and Moser, W., 2002, “Numerical Investigation of the Flow in a Pelton Turbine,” 21st IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, Sept. 9–12, pp. 373–378.
Zoppe, B., Pellone, C., Maitre, T., and Leroy, P., 2006, “Flow Analysis Inside a Pelton Turbine Bucket,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(3), pp. 500–511. [CrossRef]
Perrig, A., Avellan, F., Kueny, J.-L., Farhat, M., and Parkinson, E., 2006, “Flow in a Pelton Turbine Bucket: Numerical and Experimental Investigations,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 128(2), pp. 350–358. [CrossRef]
Hirt, C. W., and Nichols, B. D., 1981, “Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries,” J. Comput. Phys., 39(1), pp. 201–225. [CrossRef]
Santolin, A., Cavazzini, G., Ardizzon, G., and Pavesi, G., 2009, “Numerical Investigation of the Interaction Between Jet and Bucket in a Pelton Turbine,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 223(6), pp. 721–728. [CrossRef]
Jošt, D., Mežnar, P., and Lipej, A., 2010, “Numerical Prediction of a Pelton Turbine Efficiency,” 25th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Timişoara, Romania, Sept. 20–24, Paper No. 012080. [CrossRef]
Xiao, Y. X., Cui, T., Wang, Z. W., and Yan, Z. G., 2012, “Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Free Surface Flow and Dynamic Performance for a Pelton Turbine,” 26th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Beijing, Aug. 19–23, Paper No. 052033. [CrossRef]
Marongiu, J., Leboeuf, F., Caro, J., and Parkinson, E., 2010, “Free Surface Flows Simulations in Pelton Turbines Using an Hybrid SPH-ALE Method,” J. Hydraulic Res., 48(Suppl. 1), pp. 40–49. [CrossRef]
Anagnostopoulos, J. S., and Papantonis, D. E., 2012, “A Fast Lagrangian Simulation Method for Flow Analysis and Runner Design in Pelton Turbines,” J. Hydrodyn., 24(6), pp. 930–941. [CrossRef]
Vessaz, C., Jahanbakhsh, E., and Avellan, F., 2014, “Flow Simulations of a Pelton Bucket Using Finite Volume Particle Method,” 27th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Montréal, Canada, Sept. 22–26, Paper No. 012003. [CrossRef]
Hietel, D., Steiner, K., and Struckmeier, J., 2000, “A Finite-Volume Particle Method for Compressible Flows,” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 10(9), pp. 1363–1382. [CrossRef]
Quinlan, N. J., and Nestor, R. M., 2011, “Fast Exact Evaluation of Particle Interaction Vectors in the Finite Volume Particle Method,” Meshfree Methods for Partial Differential Equations V, (Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Vol. 79), Springer, Berlin, pp. 219–234. [CrossRef]
Jahanbakhsh, E., Vessaz, C., and Avellan, F., 2014, “Finite Volume Particle Method for 3-D Elasto-Plastic Solid Simulation,” 9th International SPHERIC Workshop, Paris, June 2–5, pp. 356–362.
Jahanbakhsh, E., Vessaz, C., and Avellan, F., 2014, “Silt Motion Simulation Using Finite Volume Particle Method,” 27th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Montréal, Canada, Sept. 22-26, Paper No. 052015. [CrossRef]
Jahanbakhsh, E., Pacot, O., and Avellan, F., 2012, “Implementation of a Parallel SPH-FPM Solver for Fluid Flows,” Zetta, Numer. Simul. Sci. Technol., 1, pp. 16–20. http://zetta.epfl.ch/2012/
Vessaz, C., Jahanbakhsh, E., and Avellan, F., 2012, “FPM Simulations of a 3D Impinging Jet on a Flat Plate Comparison With CFD and Experimental Results,” 7th International SPHERIC Workshop, Prato, Italy, May 29–31, pp. 214–220.
Perrig, A., 2007, “Hydrodynamics of the Free Surface Flow in Pelton Turbine Buckets,” Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, EPFL No. 3715. [CrossRef]
Monaghan, J. J., 2005, “Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics,” Rep. Prog. Phys., 68(8), pp. 1703–1759. [CrossRef]
Jahanbakhsh, E., 2014, “Simulation of Silt Erosion Using Particle-Based Methods,” Ph.D. thesis, Ècole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, EPFL No. 6284. [CrossRef]
Liou, M. S., 1996, “A Sequel to AUSM: AUSM+,” J. Comput. Phys., 129(2), pp. 364–382. [CrossRef]
Parkinson, E., Lestriez, R., and Chapuis, L., 1998, “Flow Calculation in Pelton Turbines—Part 1 Repartitor and Injector Numerical Analysis,” 19th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, Singapore, Sept. 9–11, pp. 285–293.
Avellan, F., Dupont, P., Kvicinsky, S., Chapuis, L., Parkinson, E., and Vullioud, G., 1998, “Numerical Investigation of the Flow in a Pelton Turbine,” 19th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, Singapore, Sept. 9–11, pp. 294–305.
Vessaz, C., 2015, “Finite Particle Flow Simulation of Free Jet Deviation by Rotating Pelton Buckets,” Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, EPFL No. 6470. [CrossRef]
Vessaz, C., Jahanbakhsh, E., and Avellan, F., 2013, “FPM Flow Simulations Using an Adaptive Domain Decomposition Strategy,” 8th International SPHERIC Workshop, Trondheim, Norway, June 4–6, pp. 227–232.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Rectangular support kernels and overlapping regions (a) plotted with the contour of Sheppard shape function for the particle i and top-hat kernels (b), outline of the intersection volume between particles i and j (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Outline of the case study: the buckets are defined by a reference diameter D1 and a width B2, they tilt around the Z axis and their angular position is given by θ, the inlet of the water jet has a diameter D2 and its axis is in the X direction at a distance Y=-D1/2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Outline of the case study: 30 pressure samples are located on the buckets inner surface and 13 on the outer surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Evolution of the torque for each bucket and total torque in function of the angular position for a spatial discretization of D2/Xref=50

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Influence of the spatial discretization on the averaged torque for one bucket in function of the angular position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

FVPM simulation of five rotating buckets: free surface reconstruction of the water sheet using ParaView

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time history of Cp at the pressure sensors seven, nine, 14, 17, 19, and 21 on the buckets inner surface for the FVPM result with a spatial discretization D2/Xref=50, VOF result and measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Time history of Cp at the pressure sensors 31 and 40 on the buckets outer surface for the FVPM result with a spatial discretization D2/Xref=50, VOF result and measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Wall pressure field on the bucket inner surface for the impinging angles of θ = 62 deg,θ = 72 deg,θ = 87 deg, and θ = 104 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the relative flow pattern inside the buckets between FVPM (right), VOF (middle), and experimental (right) for the impinging angles of θ = 62 deg,θ = 72 deg,θ = 87 deg, and θ = 104 deg

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In