0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Passenger Car at Yaw Angle and Two-Vehicle Platoon

[+] Author and Article Information
Armagan Altinisik

Turkish Automotive Factory, Inc. Company
(TOFAS),
Yeni Yalova Yolu Cad. No: 574,
Bursa 16369, Turkey
e-mail: armagan.altinisik@tofas.com.tr

Onur Yemenici

Assistant Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Faculty of Engineering,
Uludag University,
Gorukle Campus,
Bursa 16059, Turkey

Habib Umur

Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Faculty of Engineering,
Uludag University,
Gorukle Campus,
Bursa 16059, Turkey

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 29, 2015; final manuscript received June 5, 2015; published online August 4, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Francine Battaglia.

J. Fluids Eng 137(12), 121107 (Aug 04, 2015) Paper No: FE-15-1219; doi: 10.1115/1.4030869 History: Received March 29, 2015

Experimental and computational studies were performed to study the drag forces and the pressure distributions of a one-fifth scale model FIAT Linea at increasing yaw angle and two-vehicle platoon. Experiments were performed in the Uludag University Wind Tunnel (UURT) only for the yaw angles of 0 deg, 5 deg, and 10 deg due to the test section dimensional restriction. Supplementary tests were performed in the Ankara Wind Tunnel (ART) to evaluate the aerodynamic coefficients up to yaw angle of 40 deg. The test section blockage ratios were 20% and 1%, respectively, in the UURT and ART tunnels. The blockage effects for the yaw angles up to 10 deg were studied by the comparison of two wind tunnel results. The aerodynamic tests of two-vehicle platoon were performed in the ART tunnel at spacings of “x/L” 0, 0.5, and 1. Static pressure distributions were obtained from the model centerline and three vertical sections. In the numerical study, three-dimensional, incompressible, and steady governing equations were solved by star-ccm+ code with realizable k-ɛ two-layer turbulence model. Experimental and numerical Cp distributions and Cd values were found in good agreement for considered yaw angles and two-vehicle platoon. Maximum drag coefficient was obtained at yaw angle of 35 deg for both experimental and numerical calculations. The two-vehicle platoon analysis resulted with the significant drag coefficient improvement for the leading car at spacings of x/L  = 0 and 0.5, while for the tail car drag coefficient remained slightly above the vehicle in isolation.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Yang, Z. , Schenkel, M. , and Fadler, G. J. , 2003, “Corrections for the Pressure Gradient Effect on Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-0935. [CrossRef]
Aider, J. , Franc, J. , Beaudoin, O. , and Wesfreid, J. E. , 2010, “Drag and Lift Reduction of a 3D Bluff-Body Using Active Vortex Generators,” Exp. Fluids, 48(5), pp. 771–789. [CrossRef]
Gustavsson, T. , and Melin, T. , 2006, “Application of Vortex Generators to a Blunt Body,” TRITA-AVE 13, KTH Engineering Sciences, Stockholm.
Koike, M. , Nagayoshi, T. , and Hamamoto, N. , 2004, “Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction by Vortex Generators,” Mitsubishi Motors Research and Development Office, Technical Review No. 16.
Kourta, A. , and Gillieron, P. , 2009, “Impact of the Automotive Aerodynamic Control on the Economic Issues,” J. Appl. Fluid Mech., 2(2), pp. 69–75.
Kumar, C. R. , Chowdary, J. U. , and Reddy, K. A. , 2011, “Study of Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Using Vortex Generators,” Int. J. Adv. Eng., Sci. Technol., 7(10), pp. 181–183.
Ahmed, S. R. , and Ramm, G. , 1984, “Salient Features of the Time-Averaged Ground Vehicle Wake,” SAE Technical Paper No. 840300. [CrossRef]
Cogotti, A. , 1998, “A Parametric Study of the Ground Effect of a Simplified Car Model,” SAE Technical Paper No. 980031. [CrossRef]
Heft, I. A. , Indinger, T. , and Adams, A. N. , 2012, “Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-0168. [CrossRef]
Strangfeld, C. , Wieser, D. , Schmidt, H.-J. , Woszidlo, R. , Nayeri, C. , and Paschereit, C. , 2013, “Experimental Study of Baseline Flow Characteristics for the Realistic Car Model DrivAer,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-01-1251. [CrossRef]
Docton, M. K. R. , 1996, “The Simulation of Transient Cross Winds on Passenger Vehicles,” Ph.D. thesis, Durham University, Old Elvet, Durham, UK.
Guilmineau, E. , Chikhaoui, O. , Deng, G. , and Visonneau, M. , 2013, “Cross Wind Effects on a Simplified Car Model by a DES Approach,” Comput. Fluids, 78, pp. 29–40. [CrossRef]
Janssen, L. J. , and Hucho, W.-H. , 1973, “The Effect of Various Parameters on the Aerodynamic Drag of Passenger Cars,” Advances in Road Vehicle Aerodynamics, British Hydromechanical Association, Cranfield.
Kohut, P. , Sulitka, M. , and Randa, Z. , 2005, “Determination of Blockage Correction in Open-Jet Wind Tunnel,” 16th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena (ISTP-16), Prague.
Mieller, C. , 2002, “Lockheed Georgia Low Speed Wind Tunnel Honda Civic Hatchback Airtab Modification Results,” Lockheed Georgia Company Wind Tunnel Test No. 561.
Tan, J. , Chen, Z. , Hu, Y. , Parameswaran, S. , Rahman, S. , Gleason, M. , and Sun, R. , 2010, “Effects of Cross Wind on Sport Utility Vehicles (SUV): A Computational Study,” The Fifth International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2010), Chapel Hill, NC, May 23–27.
Tsubokura, M. , Nakashima, T. , Kitayama, M. , Ikawa, Y. , Doh, D. H. , and Kobayashi, T. , 2010, “Large Eddy Simulation on the Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of a Road Vehicle in Transient Crosswinds,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 31(6), pp. 1075–1086. [CrossRef]
Howell, J. P. , 1993, “Shape Features Which Influence Crosswind Sensitivity,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part E, 9, pp. 43–52.
Zabat, M. , Stabile, N. , Frascaroli, S. , and Browand, F. , 1995, “Drag Forces Experienced by 2, 3 & 4-Vehicle Platoons at Close Spacings,” SAE Technical Paper No. 940421. [CrossRef]
Hong, P. , Marcu, B. , Browand, F. , and Tucker, A. , 1998, “Drag Forces Experienced by Two, Full-Scale Vehicles at Close Spacing,” University of Southern California, California Path Research Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-98-5.
Orselli, E. , 2006, “Computation of Drag Force on Single and Close-Following Vehicles,” M.S. thesis, Middle East Technical University, Mechanical Engineering Department, Ankara, Turkey.
Rajamani, G. K. , 2006, “CFD Analysis of Air Flow Interactions in Vehicle Platoons,” M.S. thesis, School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Schito, P. , and Braghin, F. , 2012, “Numerical and Experimental Investigation on Vehicles in Platoon,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh., 5(1), pp. 63–71. [CrossRef]
Tsuei, L. , and Savas, O. , 2001, “Transient Aerodynamics of Vehicle Platoons During In-Line Oscillations,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 89(13), pp. 1085–1111. [CrossRef]
Watkins, S. , and Vino, G. , 2008, “The Effect of Vehicle Spacing on the Aerodynamics of a Representative Car Shape,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96(6–7), pp. 1232–1239. [CrossRef]
Altinisik, A. , Kutukceken, E. , and Umur, H. , 2015, “Experimental and Numerical Aerodynamic Analysis of a Passenger Car: Influence of the Blockage Ratio on Drag Coefficient,” ASME J. Fluid Eng., 137(8), p. 081104. [CrossRef]
Moffat, R. J. , 1988, “Describing the Uncertainty in Experimental Results,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 1(1), pp. 3–17. [CrossRef]
Williams, J. , Quinlan, W. J. , Hacket, J. E. , Thompson, S. A. , Marinaccio, T. , and Robertson, A. , 1994, “A Calibration Study of CFD for Automotive Shapes and CD,” SAE Technical Paper No. 940323. [CrossRef]
Gaylard, A. P. , Baxendale, A. J. , and Howell, J. P. , 1998, “The Use of CFD to Predict the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Simple Automotive Shapes,” SAE Technical Paper No. 980036. [CrossRef]
Connor, C. , Kharazi, A. , Walter, J. , and Martindale, B. , 2006, “Comparison of Wind Tunnel Configurations for Testing Closed-Wheel Race Cars: A CFD Study,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-3620. [CrossRef]
Mokhtar, W. A. , 2008, “Aerodynamics of High-Lift Wings With Ground Effect for Racecars,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2008-01-0656. [CrossRef]
Ahmad, N. E. , Abo-Serie, E. , and Gaylard, A. , 2010, “Mesh Optimization for Ground Vehicle Aerodynamics,” CFD Lett., 2(1), pp. 54–65.
Heinzelmann, B. , Indinger, T. , Adams, N. , and Blanke, R. , 2012, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Under Hood Flow With Heat Transfer for a Scaled Tractor-Trailer,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh., 5(1), pp. 42–56. [CrossRef]
Regin, F. A. , Manimanoharan, M. , Reddy, A. B. , and Nigam, P. , 2013, “Aerodynamic Analysis of Cabriolet Passenger Car: A Design Approach,” SAE Paper No. 2013-01-0037. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , Ding, W. , and Zhang, Y. , 2014, “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on the MIRA Reference Car Model,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2014-01-0603.
Hanjalic, K. , 2005, “Will RANS Survive LES? A View of Perspectives,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 127(5), pp. 831–839. [CrossRef]
Roy, J. C. , Payne, J. , and Payne, M. M. , 2006, “RANS Simulations of a Simplified Tractor/Trailer Geometry,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 128(5), pp. 1083–1089. [CrossRef]
Makowski, F. T. , and Kim, S.-U. , 2000, “Advances in External-Aero Simulation of Ground Vehicles Using the Steady RANS Equations,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0484. [CrossRef]
Jakirlic, S. , Kutej, L. , Basara, B. , and Tropea, C. , 2014, “Computational Study of the Aerodynamics of a Realistic Car Model by Means of RANS and Hybrid RANS/LES Approaches,” SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars Mech. Syst., 7(2), pp. 559–574. [CrossRef]
Cilies, J. A. , Issakhanian, E. , Jimenez, J. , and Iaccarino, G. , 2012, “An Aerodynamic Investigation of an Isolated Stationary Formula 1 Wheel Assembly,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(12), p. 021101. [CrossRef]
Veluri, P. S. , Roy, C. J. , Ahmed, A. , Rifki, R. , Worley, J. C. , and Rectenwald, B. , 2009, “Joint Computational/Experimental Aerodynamic Study of a Simplified Tractor/Trailer Geometry,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 131(8), p. 081201. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V. , 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Shih, T. , Liou, W. W. , Shabbir, A. , Yang, Z. , and Zhu, J. , 1995, “A New k-ε Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Fluids, 24(3), pp. 227–238. [CrossRef]
Singh, S. N. , Rai, L. , Puri, P. , and Bhatnagar, A. , 2005, “Effect of Moving Surface on the Aerodynamic Drag of Road Vehicles,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D, 219(2), pp. 127–134. [CrossRef]
Rodi, W. , 1991, “Experience With Two-Layer Models Combining the k-ɛ Model With a One-Equation Model Near the Wall,” AIAA Paper No. 91-0216. [CrossRef]
Suria, O. V. , Testa, E. , Repici, G. , Peraudo, P. , and Maggiore, P. , 2011, “A PEM Fuel Cell Laminar and Turbulent Models Comparison, Aiming at Identifying Small-Scale Plate Channel Phenomena: A Mesh Independent Configuration,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-1177. [CrossRef]
Buchheim, R. , Unger, R. , Carr, G. W. , Cogotti, A. , Carrone, A. , Kuhn, A. , and Nilsson, L. U. , 1980, “Comparison Tests Between Major European Automotive Wind Tunnels,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800140. [CrossRef]
Amromin, E. L. , 2013, “Vehicles Drag Reduction With Control of Critical Reynolds Number,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(10), p. 101105. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Dimensions of one-fifth scale model and (b) positions and quantities of the pressure holes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Scaled view of one-fifth model in UURT test section at yaw angles of 0 deg, 5 deg, and 10 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The y+ distributions on the model wall surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Midsection of the computational domains for β= 30 deg and x/L = 0 close spacing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

UURT and ART model centerline pressure distributions at yaw angles of 0 deg, 5 deg, and 10 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) CFD pressure distributions on the model centerline at increasing yaw angles and (b) comparison of the CFD and the experimental results at yaw angles of 10 deg and 30 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) CFD pressure contours at yaw angles up to 40 deg and (b) tuft test at yaw angle of 30 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

UURT and ART pressure distributions on vertical sections at yaw angles of 0 deg, 5 deg, and 10 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

ART pressure distributions on vertical sections at yaw angles up to 30 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Schematic view of the model at yaw angle and (b) typical normalized drag coefficient at increasing yaw angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of the drag coefficients Cd with increasing yaw angles β

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

CFD pressure contours at vehicle spacings of x/L  = 0, 0.5, and 1.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of the CFD and experimental centerline Cp distributions at close spacings

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Drag coefficients of two-vehicle platoon at close spacings

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In