0
Technical Brief

Localization of Flow Separation and Transition Over a Pitching NACA0012 Airfoil at Transitional Reynolds Numbers Using Hot-Films

[+] Author and Article Information
Allison Poels, Daniel Rudmin, Dominique Poirel

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Royal Military College of Canada,
Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada

Azemi Benaissa

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Royal Military College of Canada,
Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
e-mail: benaissa-a@rmc.ca

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 10, 2014; final manuscript received July 6, 2015; published online August 6, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Feng Liu.

J. Fluids Eng 137(12), 124501 (Aug 06, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: FE-14-1371; doi: 10.1115/1.4031008 History: Received July 10, 2014

Separation and transition of flow over a pitching airfoil at transitional Reynolds Number are analyzed experimentally. The method is based on a windowed correlation between hot-film sensor signals taken simultaneously or synchronized based on the airfoil pitch angle. A comparison with large eddy simulation (LES) simulation obtained in the same conditions is presented and discussed. Our results agree very well with the LES data for the separation location during the pitch-up. For the pitch-down, the results show differences with the LES. However, when the LES data are analyzed with the same correlation technique, the results are in a better agreement.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Wake of the driven airfoil wake (a) and free airfoil wake (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Phase-matched hot-film signals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Windowed cross-correlations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Correlation process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Hot-film correlations for Re = 820,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Experimental cycle-averaged correlations at Re = 82,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Average incidence of separation and transition for each chord position for Re = 62,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Average incidence of separation and transition for each chord position for Re = 113,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Average incidence of separation and transition for each chord position for Re = 82,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Correlation coefficients from LES shear stress [15]

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In