Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Single-Interface Richtmyer–Meshkov Turbulent Mixing at the Los Alamos Vertical Shock Tube

[+] Author and Article Information
B. M. Wilson

P-23, Physics Division,
Los Alamos National Laboratory,
Los Alamos, NM 87545
e-mail: bwilson@lanl.gov

R. Mejia-Alvarez

P-23, Physics Division,
Los Alamos National Laboratory,
Los Alamos, NM 87545
e-mail: rimejal@lanl.gov

K. P. Prestridge

P-23, Physics Division,
Los Alamos National Laboratory,
Los Alamos, NM 87545
e-mail: kpp@lanl.gov

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 30, 2015; final manuscript received June 18, 2015; published online April 12, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Praveen Ramaprabhu.

J. Fluids Eng 138(7), 070901 (Apr 12, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-15-1071; doi: 10.1115/1.4032529 History: Received January 30, 2015; Revised June 18, 2015

Mach number and initial conditions effects on Richtmyer–Meshkov (RM) mixing are studied by the vertical shock tube (VST) at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). At the VST, a perturbed stable light-to-heavy (air–SF6, A = 0.64) interface is impulsively accelerated with a shock wave to induce RM mixing. We investigate changes to both large and small scales of mixing caused by changing the incident Mach number (Ma = 1.3 and 1.45) and the three-dimensional (3D) perturbations on the interface. Simultaneous density (quantitative planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF)) and velocity (particle image velocimetry (PIV)) measurements are used to characterize preshock initial conditions and the dynamic shocked interface. Initial conditions and fluid properties are characterized before shock. Using two types of dynamic measurements, time series (N = 5 realizations at ten locations) and statistics (N = 100 realizations at a single location) of the density and velocity fields, we calculate several mixing quantities. Mix width, density-specific volume correlations, density–vorticity correlations, vorticity, enstrophy, strain, and instantaneous dissipation rate are examined at one downstream location. Results indicate that large-scale mixing, such as the mix width, is strongly dependent on Mach number, whereas small scales are strongly influenced by initial conditions. The enstrophy and strain show focused mixing activity in the spike regions.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Richtmyer, R. D. , 1960, “ Taylor Instability in Shock Acceleration of Compressible Fluids,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 13(2), pp. 297–319. [CrossRef]
Meshkov, E. E. , 1969, “ Instability of the Interface of Two Gases Accelerated by a Shock Wave,” Fluid Dynamics, 4(5), pp. 101–104. [CrossRef]
Brouillette, M. , and Sturtevant, B. , 1994, “ Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability: Single-Scale Perturbations on a Continuous Interface,” J. Fluid Mech., 263, pp. 271–292. [CrossRef]
Vetter, M. , and Sturtevant, B. , 1995, “ Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability of an Air/SF6 Interface,” Shock Waves, 4(5), pp. 247–252. [CrossRef]
Dimonte, G. , and Schneider, M. , 2000, “ Density Ratio Dependence of Rayleigh–Taylor Mixing for Sustained and Impulsive Acceleration Histories,” Phys. Fluids, 12(2), pp. 304–321. [CrossRef]
Poggi, F. , Thorembey, M. H. , and Rodriguez, G. , 1998, “ Velocity Measurements in Turbulent Gaseous Mixtures Induced by Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability,” Phys. Fluids, 10(11), p. 2698. [CrossRef]
Prestridge, K. , Rightley, P. M. , Vorobieff, P. , Benjamin, R. F. , and Kurnit, N. A. , 2000, “ Simultaneous Density-Field Visualization and PIV of a Shock-Accelerated Gas Curtain,” Exp. Fluids, 29(4), pp. 339–346. [CrossRef]
Tomkins, C. , Kumar, S. , Orlicz, G. , and Prestridge, K. , 2008, “ An Experimental Investigation of Mixing Mechanisms in Shock-Accelerated Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 611, pp. 131–150. [CrossRef]
Balakumar, B. J. , Orlicz, G. C. , Ristorcelli, J. R. , Balasubramanian, S. , Prestridge, K. , and Tomkins, C. , 2012, “ Turbulent Mixing in a Richtmyer–Meshkov Fluid Layer After Reshock: Velocity and Density Statistics,” J. Fluid Mech., 696, pp. 67–93. [CrossRef]
Orlicz, G. C. , Balasubramanian, S. , and Prestridge, K. , 2013, “ Incident Shock Mach Number Effects on Richtmyer–Meshkov Mixing in a Heavy Gas Layer,” Phys. Fluids, 25(11), p. 114101. [CrossRef]
Vorobieff, P. , Mohamed, N. G. , Tomkins, C. , Goodenough, C. , Marr-Lyon, M. , and Benjamin, R. F. , 2003, “ Scaling Evolution in Shock-Induced Transition to Turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E, 68(6), p. 065301. [CrossRef]
Weber, C. R. , Haehn, N. S. , Oakley, J. G. , Rothamer, D. A. , and Bonazza, R. , 2014, “ An Experimental Investigation of the Turbulent Mixing Transition in the Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability,” J. Fluid Mech., 748, pp. 457–487. [CrossRef]
McFarland, J. , Reilly, D. , Creel, S. , McDonald, C. , Finn, T. , and Ranjan, D. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation of the Inclined Interface Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability Before and After Reshock,” Exp. Fluids, 55(1), pp. 1–14.
Lombardini, M. , Pullin, D. I. , and Meiron, D. I. , 2012, “ Transition to Turbulence in Shock-Driven Mixing: A Mach Number Study,” J. Fluid Mech., 690, pp. 203–226. [CrossRef]
Orlicz, G. C. , Balakumar, B. J. , Tomkins, C. D. , and Prestridge, K. P. , 2009, “ A Mach Number Study of the Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability in a Varicose Heavy-Gas Curtain,” Phys. Fluids, 21(6), p. 064102. [CrossRef]
Mejia-Alvarez, R. , Wilson, B. , Leftwich, M. C. , Martinez, A. A. , and Prestridge, K. P. , 2015, “ Design of a Fast Diaphragmless Shock Tube Driver,” Shock Waves, 25(6), pp. 635–650. [CrossRef]
Fairbanks, D. F. , and Wilke, C. R. , 1950, “ Diffusion Coefficients in Multicomponent Gas Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 42(3), pp. 471–475. [CrossRef]
Reid, R. C. , Prausnitz, J. M. , and Poling, B. E. , 1987, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Lucas, K. , 1981, “ Phase Equilibria and Fluid Properties in the Chemical Industry,” Chem. Ing. Tech., 53(12), pp. 959–960. [CrossRef]
Fuller, E. N. , Schettler, P. D. , and Giddings, J. C. , 1966, “ A New Method for Prediction of Binary Gas-Phase Diffusion Coefficients,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 58(5), pp. 19–27. [CrossRef]
Yaws, C. L. , 2010, Yaws' Transport Properties of Chemicals and Hydrocarbons (Electronic Edition), Knovel, New York.
Yaws, C. L. , 2012, Yaws' Critical Property Data for Chemical Engineers and Chemists, Knovel, New York.
Marrero, T. R. , and Mason, E. A. , 1972, “ Gaseous Diffusion Coefficients,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1(1), pp. 3–118. [CrossRef]
Toor, H. L. , 1957, “ Diffusion in Three-Component Gas Mixtures,” AIChE, 3(2), pp. 198–207. [CrossRef]
Eckstein, A. C. , and Vlachos, P. P. , 2009, “ Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (DPIV) Robust Phase Correlation,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 20(5), p. 055401. [CrossRef]
Ristorcelli, J. , Gowardhan, A. , and Grinstein, F. , 2013, “ Two Classes of Richtmyer–Meshkov Instabilities: A Detailed Statistical Look,” Phys. Fluids, 25(4), p. 044106. [CrossRef]
Zhou, J. , Adrian, R. J. , Balachandar, S. , and Kendall, T. M. , 1999, “ Mechanisms for Generating Coherent Packets of Hairpin Vortices in Channel Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 387, pp. 353–396 [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Representation of (a) linear growth, (b) nonlinear growth of vortex pairs (mushroom vortices), and (c) breakdown of large-scale structure to a cascade of smaller scales in RM evolution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The test section in the VST showing the gates that close off before the downward moving shock interacts with the initial conditions, the PLIF–PIV measurement locations, and the orientation of the diagnostic laser sheets

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Measured and predicted x1t diagram for Ma = 1.3 and 1.45 with 12% acetone concentration in the air. Measurements are made with pressure transducers along the wall of the shock tube.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Example of (a) raw fluorescence intensity image and (b) corrected Q-PLIF density measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Examples of the instantaneous velocity fluctuations and density fields for four realizations of NLRM and LRM initial conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Density spectra for the NRLM and LRM initial conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Time-series measurements of instantaneous density fields for two Mach numbers (Ma = 1.3 and 1.45) and two initial conditions (NLRM and LRM)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Evolution of mix widths, h/h0, for two Mach numbers (Ma = 1.3 and 1.45) and two initial conditions (NLRM and LRM)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time-series measurements of instantaneous dissipation rate, χ, fields for two Mach numbers (Ma = 1.3 and 1.45) and two initial conditions (NLRM and LRM)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Density spectra for shocked RM at x1=325 mm at Ma = 1.3 and NLRM and LRM initial conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Mean density, ρ¯, and mean velocity, ui¯, of the (a) NLRM and (b) LRM initial conditions. Also, the (c) density-specific volume b and density variance ρ′ρ′¯ of the NLRM and LRM initial conditions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The Taylor microscale for the streamwise velocity, λT,u1, spanwise velocity, λT,u2, and density λT,ρ, for NLRM IC at Ma = 1.3 and x1=325 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Mean density, ρ, density–vorticity correlation, ρ′ω′¯, enstrophy fluctuations, |ω′|2¯, enstrophy fluctuations, |ω′|2¯, instantaneous dissipation rate, χ¯, and density-specific volume correlation, −ρ′ν′¯ for NLRM IC at Ma = 1.3 and x1=325 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Example of the instantaneous density, velocity, and vorticity field. The symmetric (strain, L1) and asymmetric (rotation, L2) tensors of the velocity gradients are also shown.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In