0
Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

Interfacial Pressure Coefficient for Ellipsoids and Its Effect on the Two-Fluid Model Eigenvalues

[+] Author and Article Information
Avinash Vaidheeswaran

School of Nuclear Engineering,
Purdue University,
400 Central Drive,
West Lafayette, IN 47906
e-mail: avaidhee@purdue.edu

Martin Lopez de Bertodano

Mem. ASME
School of Nuclear Engineering,
Purdue University,
400 Central Drive,
West Lafayette, IN 47906
e-mail: bertodan@purdue.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 14, 2015; final manuscript received January 31, 2016; published online April 22, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Alfredo Soldati.

J. Fluids Eng 138(8), 081302 (Apr 22, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: FE-15-1664; doi: 10.1115/1.4032755 History: Received September 14, 2015; Revised January 31, 2016

Analytical expressions for interfacial pressure coefficients are obtained based on the geometry of the bubbles occurring in two-phase flows. It is known that the shape of the bubbles affects the virtual mass and interfacial pressure coefficients, which in turn determines the cutoff void fraction for the well-posedness of two-fluid model (TFM). The coefficient used in the interfacial pressure difference correlation is derived assuming potential flow around a perfect sphere. In reality, the bubbles seen in two-phase flows get deformed, and hence, it is required to estimate the coefficients for nonspherical geometries. Oblate and prolate ellipsoids are considered, and their respective coefficients are determined. It is seen that the well-posedness limit of the TFM is determined by the combination of virtual mass and interfacial pressure coefficient used. The effect of flow separation on the coefficient values is also analyzed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Pauchon, C. , and Banerjee, S. , 1986, “ Interphase Momentum Interaction Effects in the Averaged Multifield Model—Part 1: Void Propagation in Bubbly Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 12(4), pp. 559–573. [CrossRef]
Stuhmiller, J. H. , 1977, “ The Influence of Interfacial Pressure Forces on the Character of Two-Phase Flow Model Equations,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 3(6), pp. 551–560. [CrossRef]
Drew, D. A. , and Passman, S. L. , 1998, Theory of Multicomponent Fluids, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Zaruba, A. , Krepper, E. , Prasser, H.-M. , and Schliecher, E. , 2005, “ Measurement of Bubble Velocity Profiles and Turbulent Diffusion Coefficients of the Gaseous Phase in Rectangular Bubble Column Using Image Processing,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 29(7), pp. 851–860. [CrossRef]
Lucas, D. , Prasser, H.-M. , and Manera, A. , 2005, “ Influence of the Lift Force on the Stability of a Bubble Column,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(13), pp. 3609–3619. [CrossRef]
Enwald, H. , Peirano, E. , and Almstedt, A. E. , 1996, “ Eulerian Two-Phase Flow Theory Applied to Fluidization,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 22, pp. 21–66. [CrossRef]
Saffman, P. G. , 1956, “ On the Rise of Small Air Bubbles in Water,” J. Fluid Mech., 1(03), pp. 249–275. [CrossRef]
Mercier, J. , Lyrio, A. , and Forslund, R. , 1973, “ Three-Dimensional Study of the Nonrectilinear Trajectory of Air Bubbles Rising in Water,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 40(3), pp. 650–654. [CrossRef]
Lunde, K. , and Perkins, R. , 1998, “ Shape Oscillations of Rising Bubbles,” Appl. Sci. Res., 58(1–4), pp. 387–408. [CrossRef]
Brucker, C. , 1999, “ Structure and Dynamics of the Wake of Bubbles and Its Relevance for Bubble Interaction,” Phys. Fluids, 11(7), pp. 1781–1796. [CrossRef]
Lance, M. , and Bataille, J. , 1991, “ Turbulence in the Liquid Phase of a Uniform Bubbly Air-Water Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 222, pp. 95–118. [CrossRef]
Lamb, H. , 1932, Hydrodynamics, Dover, New York.
Clift, R. , Grace, J. R. , and Weber, M. E. , 1978, Bubble, Drops and Particles, Academic Press, New York.
Pauchon, C. , and Banerjee, S. , 1988, “ Interphase Momentum Interaction Effects in the Averaged Multifield Model—Part II: Kinematic Waves and Interfacial Drag in Bubbly Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 14(3), pp. 253–264. [CrossRef]
Vaidheeswaran, A. , 2015, “ Well-Posedness and Convergence of CFD Two-Fluid Model for Bubbly Flows,” Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Ishii, M. , 1975, Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-Phase Flow, Eyrolles, Paris.
Vernier, P. , and Delhaye, J. M. , 1968, “ General Two-Phase Flow Equations Applied to the Thermohydrodynamics of Boiling Nuclear Reactors,” Energ. Primaire, 4, pp. 5–36.
Ishii, M. , and Hibiki, T. , 2011, Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow, Vol. 2, Springer, New York.
Drew, D. A. , and Lahey, R. T., Jr. , 1987, “ The Virtual Mass and Lift Force on a Sphere in Rotating and Straining Inviscid Fluid,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 13(1), pp. 113–121. [CrossRef]
Tokuhiro, A. , Maekawa, M. , Iizuka, K. , Hishida, K. , and Maeda, M. , 1998, “ Turbulent Flow Past a Bubble and an Ellipsoid Using Shadow-Image and PIV Techniques,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 24(8), pp. 1383–1406. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. M. , Kurihara, T. , Monji, H. , and Matsui, G. , 2002, “ Measurement of Particle/Bubble Motion and Turbulence Around it by Hybrid PIV,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 12, pp. 421–428. [CrossRef]
Reddy Vanga, B. N. , 2004, “ Experimental Investigation and Two-Fluid Model Large Eddy Simulations of Re-Circulating Turbulent Flow in Bubble Columns,” Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Haley, T. , Drew, D. A. , and Lahey, R. T., Jr. , 1991, “ An Analysis of the Eigen Values of Bubbly Two-Phase Flows,” Chem. Eng. Commun., 106(1), pp. 93–117. [CrossRef]
Park, J. W. , Drew, D. A. , and Lahey, R. T., Jr. , 1998, “ The Analysis of Void Wave Propagation in Adiabatic Monodispersed Bubbly Two-Phase Flows Using an Ensemble-Averaged Two-Fluid Model,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 24(7), pp. 1205–1244. [CrossRef]
Vaidheeswaran, A. , Fullmer, W. , and Lopez de Bertodano, M. , 2015, “ On Well-Posedness and Stability of the Two-Fluid Model for Vertical Bubbly Flows,” 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Chicago, IL.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Eigenvalues with Cp = 0.25 and CVM = 0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Oblate ellipsoid geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Prolate ellipsoid geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of coefficients for oblate ellipsoid (top) and prolate ellipsoid (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Eigenvalues for oblate ellipsoid (top) and prolate ellipsoid (bottom)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In