0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Structure of Turbulent Flows Over Forward Facing Steps With Adverse Pressure Gradient

[+] Author and Article Information
Hassan Iftekhar

Department of Automotive, Mechanical and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada

Martin Agelin-Chaab

Department of Automotive, Mechanical and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: martin.agelin-chaab@uoit.ca

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received October 26, 2015; final manuscript received February 15, 2016; published online July 15, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Mark F. Tachie.

J. Fluids Eng 138(11), 111202 (Jul 15, 2016) (12 pages) Paper No: FE-15-1769; doi: 10.1115/1.4033030 History: Received October 26, 2015; Revised February 15, 2016

This paper reports an experimental study on the effects of adverse pressure gradient (APG) and Reynolds number on turbulent flows over a forward facing step (FFS) by employing three APGs and three Reynolds numbers. A particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique was used to conduct velocity measurements at several locations downstream, and the flow statistics up to 68 step heights are reported. The step height was maintained at 6 mm, and the Reynolds numbers based on the step height and freestream mean velocity were 1600, 3200, and 4800. The mean reattachment length increases with the increase in Reynolds number without the APG whereas the mean reattachment length remains constant for increasing APG. The proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) results confirmed that higher Reynolds numbers caused the large-scale structures to be more defined and organized close to the step surface.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Shao, W. , and Agelin-Chaab, M. , 2015, “ Turbulent Flows Over Forward Facing Steps With Surface Roughness,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 138(2), p. 021103. [CrossRef]
Bradshaw, P. , and Wong, F. Y. F. , 1972, “ The Reattachment and Relaxation of a Turbulent Shear Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 52(1), pp. 113–135. [CrossRef]
Abu-Mulaweh, H. I. , 2005, “ Turbulent Mixed Convection Flow Over a Forward-Facing Step—The Effect of Step Heights,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 44(2), pp. 155–162. [CrossRef]
Tachie, M. F. , 2007, “ Particle Image Velocimetry Study of Turbulent Flow Over Transverse Square Ribs in an Asymmetric Diffuse,” Physics of Fluids, 19(6), p. 065106. [CrossRef]
Agelin-Chaab, M. , and Tachie, M. F. , 2008, “ PIV Study of Separated and Reattached Open Channel Flow Over Surface Mounted Blocks,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130(6), p. 061206. [CrossRef]
Kiya, M. , and Sasaki, K. , 1983, “ Structure of a Turbulent Separation Bubble,” J. Fluid Mech., 137, pp. 83–113. [CrossRef]
Shao, W. J. , and Agelin-Chaab, M. , 2014, “ The Structure of Forward Facing Step Flows in Adverse Pressure Gradient,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2014-21357.
Shah, M. K. , and Tachie, M. F. , 2008, “ Flow Relaxation Past a Transverse Square Rib in Pressure Gradients,” AIAA J., 46(7), pp. 1849–1863. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. , Kline, S. J. , and Johnston, J. P. , 1980, “ Investigation of a Reattaching Turbulent Shear Layer: Flow Over a Backward-Facing Step,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 102(3), pp. 302–308. [CrossRef]
Castro, I. P. , and Dianat, M. , 1983, “ Surface Flow Patterns on Rectangular Bodies in Thick Boundary Layers,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 11(1), pp. 107–119. [CrossRef]
Tachie, M. F. , Balachandar, R. , and Bergstrom, D. J. , 2001, “ Open Channel Boundary Layer Relaxation Behind a Forward Facing Step at Low Reynolds Numbers,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123(3), pp. 539–544. [CrossRef]
Largeau, J. F. , and Moriniere, V. , 2007, “ Wall Pressure Fluctuations and Topology in Separated Flows Over a Forward-Facing Step,” Exp. Fluids, 42(1), pp. 21–40. [CrossRef]
Shah, M. K. , and Tachie, M. F. , 2007, “ PIV Investigation of an Open Channel Flow Over a Forward Facing Step,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2007-37593, pp. 639–644.
Sherry, M. , Jacono, D. L. , and Sheridan, J. , 2010, “ An Experimental Investigation of the Recirculation Zone Formed Downstream of a Forward Facing Step,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 98(12), pp. 888–894. [CrossRef]
Sherry, M. J. , Jacono, D. L. , Sheridan, J. , Mathis, R. , and Marusic, I. , 2009, “ Flow Separation Characterisation of a Forward Facing Step Immersed in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, pp. 1325–1330.
Camussi, R. , Felli, M. , Pereira, F. , Aloisio, G. , and Di Marco, A. , 2008, “ Statistical Properties of Wall Pressure Fluctuations Over a Forward-Facing Step,” Phys. Fluids, 20(7), p. 075113. [CrossRef]
Awasthi, M. , Devenport, W. J. , Glegg, S. A. , and Forest, J. B. , 2014, “ Pressure Fluctuations Produced by Forward Steps Immersed in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 756, pp. 384–421. [CrossRef]
Essel, E. E. , Thacher, E. W. , and Tachie, M. F. , 2014, “ PIV Investigation of Reynolds Number Effects on a Closed Channel Flow Over a Smooth Forward Facing Step,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2014-21266.
Ren, H. , and Wu, Y. , 2011, “ Turbulent Boundary Layers Over Smooth and Rough Forward-Facing Steps,” Phys. Fluids, 23(4), p. 045102. [CrossRef]
Wu, Y. , and Ren, H. , 2013, “ On the Impacts of Coarse-Scale Models of Realistic Roughness on a Forward-Facing Step Turbulent Flow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 40, pp. 15–31. [CrossRef]
Lee, J. H. , and Sung, H. J. , 2009, “ Structures in Turbulent Boundary Layers Subjected to Adverse Pressure Gradients,” J. Fluid Mech., 639, pp. 101–131. [CrossRef]
Aubertine, C. D. , and Eaton, J. K. , 2005, “ Turbulence Development in a Non-Equilibrium Turbulent Boundary Layer With Mild Adverse Pressure Gradient,” J. Fluid Mech., 532, pp. 345–364. [CrossRef]
Agelin-Chaab, M. , and Tachie, M. F. , 2008, “ PIV Study of Adverse and Favorable Pressure Gradient Turbulent Flows Over Transverse Ribs,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130(11), p. 111305. [CrossRef]
Gungor, A. G. , Maciel, Y. , Simens, M. P. , and Soria, J. , 2014, “ Analysis of a Turbulent Boundary Layer Subjected to a Strong Adverse Pressure Gradient,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 506(1), p. 012007. [CrossRef]
Kim, D. S. , White, B. R. , Ayala, A. , and Bagheri, N. , 1999, “ Higher-Order Turbulence Products of Velocity and Temperature for Adverse Pressure Gradient Boundary Layer Flows,” Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, pp. 125–132.
Spalart, P. R. , and Watmuff, J. H. , 1993, “ Experimental and Numerical Study of a Turbulent Boundary Layer With Pressure Gradients,” J. Fluid Mech., 249, pp. 337–371. [CrossRef]
De Brederode, V. A. S. L. , and Bradshaw, P. , 1972, “ Three-Dimensional Flow in Nominally Two-Dimensional Separation Bubbles: Flow Behind a Rearward-Facing Step I,” Aeronautical Report No. 72-19, Imperial College of Science and Technology.
Coleman, H. W. , and Steele, W. G. , 1995, “ Engineering Application of Experimental Uncertainty Analysis,” AIAA J., 33(10), pp. 1888–1896. [CrossRef]
Forliti, D. J. , Strykowski, P. J. , and Debatin, K. , 2000, “ Bias and Precision Errors of Digital Particle Image Velocimetry,” Exp. Fluids, 28(5), pp. 436–447. [CrossRef]
Hattori, H. , and Nagano, Y. , 2010, “ Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Over Forward-Facing Step Via Direct Numerical Simulation,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 31(3), pp. 284–294. [CrossRef]
Lumley, J. L. , 1967, “ The Structure of Inhomogeneous Turbulent Flows,” Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 166–178.
Alfonsi, G. , and Primavera, L. , 2006, “ Dynamics of POD Modes in Wall Bounded Turbulent Flow,” Computational Science–ICCS, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 465–472.
Shah, M. K. , and Tachie, M. F. , 2009, “ Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Analysis of Separated and Reattached Pressure Gradient Flows,” AIAA J., 47(11), pp. 2616–2631. [CrossRef]
Sirovich, L. , 1987, “ Turbulence and the Dynamics of Coherent Structures. Part I: Coherent Structures,” Q. Appl. Math., 45(3), pp. 561–571.
Meyer, K. E. , Pedersen, J. M. , and Özcan, O. , 2007, “ A Turbulent Jet in Crossflow Analysed With Proper Orthogonal Decomposition,” J. Fluid Mech., 583, pp. 199–227. [CrossRef]
Kostas, J. , Soria, J. , and Chong, M. S. , 2005, “ A Comparison Between Snapshot POD Analysis of PIV Velocity and Vorticity Data,” Exp. Fluids, 38(2), pp. 146–160. [CrossRef]
Durgesh, V. , Naughton, J. W. , and Whitmore, S. A. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation of Base-Drag Reduction Via Boundary-Layer Modification,” AIAA J., 51(2), pp. 416–425. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Profiles of wall-normal mean velocities V normalized by Um

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Profiles of streamwise mean velocities U at selected locations normalized by Um

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of sectional a side view of test section and approximate locations of the measurement plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the mean flow features over a FFS [14,15]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Profiles of streamwise Reynolds normal stresses 〈uu〉 normalized by Um

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Profiles of wall-normal Reynolds normal stresses 〈vv〉 normalized by Um

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Profiles of Reynolds shear stresses −〈uv〉 normalized by Um

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Profiles of streamwise triple velocity products normalized by Um

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Profiles of wall-normal triple velocity products normalized by Um

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Energy fraction for N samples for APG-0, Reh = 4800, plane: P1 and (b) cumulative energy fraction for APG-0 & APG-4 for Reh = 4800 in planes P1 and P3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Isocontours corresponding to streamwise POD modes φu in the region: 0 < x/h < 8, (a), (c), (e), (g) APG-0; Reh = 1600; (b), (d), (f), (h) APG-0; Reh = 4800

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Isocontours corresponding to wall-normal POD modes φv in the region: 0 < x/h < 8, (a), (c), (e), (g) APG-0; Reh = 1600; (b), (d), (f), (h) APG-0; Reh = 4800

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Downstream POD modes φv of planes P1, P3, P5 in the region 0 < x/h < 66

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In