0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Impact of Blockage on the Hydrodynamic Performance of Oscillating-Foils Hydrokinetic Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Etienne Gauthier

Laboratoire de Mécanique des
Fluides Numérique,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Laval University,
Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
e-mail: etienne.gauthier.4@ulaval.ca

Thomas Kinsey

Laboratoire de Mécanique des
Fluides Numérique,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Laval University,
Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
e-mail: thomas.kinsey.1@ulaval.ca

Guy Dumas

Laboratoire de Mécanique des
Fluides Numérique,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Laval University,
Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
e-mail: gdumas@gmc.ulaval.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received June 22, 2015; final manuscript received March 10, 2016; published online May 26, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Elias Balaras.

J. Fluids Eng 138(9), 091103 (May 26, 2016) (13 pages) Paper No: FE-15-1423; doi: 10.1115/1.4033298 History: Received June 22, 2015; Revised March 10, 2016

This paper describes a study of the impact of confinement on the hydrodynamic performance of oscillating-foils hydrokinetic turbines (OFHT). This work aims to contribute to the development of standards applying to marine energy converters. These blockage effects have indeed to be taken into account when comparing measurements obtained in flumes, towing tanks, and natural sites. This paper provides appropriate correction formula to do so for OFHT based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations performed at a Reynolds Number Re = 3 × 106 for reduced frequencies between f* = 0.08 and f* = 0.22 considering area-based blockage ratios ranging from ε = 0.2% to 60%. The need to discriminate between the vertical and horizontal confinement and the impact of the foil position in the channel are also investigated and are shown to be of second-order as compared to the overall blockage level. As expected, it is confirmed that the power extracted by the OFHT increases with the blockage level. It is further observed that for blockage ratio of less than ε = 40%, the power extracted scales linearly with ε. The approach proposed to correlate the performance of the OFHT in different blockage conditions uses the correction proposed by Barnsley and Wellicome and assumes a linear relation between the power extracted and the blockage. This technique is shown to be accurate for most of the practical operating conditions for blockage ratios up to 50%.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Imposed heaving h(t) and pitching θ(t) motions. Adapted from Ref. [12].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dependency of the cycle-averaged power coefficient CP*¯ on blockage for different reduced frequencies f*

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Computational domain and exterior boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Description of the overset mesh technique and the interface characteristics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Characteristics of the mesh shown on a vertical slice at a midspan position for a blockage of ε = 50%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Dimensions of the channel cross sections tested

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Power coefficient evolution for different channel CA and the limit 2D case for ε = 12.4% and f* = 0.18

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Off-centered turbines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Mean power coefficient CP*¯ normalized by the mean power coefficient of the unconfined case (CP*¯ε = 0.2%) with respect to blockage ratio for different reduced frequencies. Linear regression curves are shown for 0% ≤ ε ≤ 50%.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Mean power coefficient CP*¯ normalized by the mean power coefficient of the unconfined case (CP*¯ε = 0.2%) with respect to blockage ratio for a reduced frequency of f* = 0.18. A linear regression curve for 0% ≤ ε ≤ 40% and an exponential regression curve for 0% ≤ ε ≤ 60% are also presented.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Evolution of instantaneous vertical force coefficient CY at f* = 0.08 for ε = 0.2% and ε = 49.7% along with the instantaneous heaving velocity VY /U

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Evolution of vorticity fields (red counterclockwise and blue clockwise) at a reduced frequency of f* = 0.12 for an unconfined hydrofoil (ε = 0.2%) and for a blockage of ε = 49.7%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Evolution of vorticity fields (red counterclockwise and blue clockwise) for an unconfined hydrofoil (ε = 0.2%) at reduced frequencies of f* = 0.08 and 0.22

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Power coefficient (CP*¯) with respect to the reduced frequency for an unconfined NACA 0015 oscillating foil of aspect ratio 7 at Re = 500,000 (xp/c = 0.33, H0/c = 1.0, θ0 = 75 deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Hydrodynamic polar of a NACA 0025 rectangular wing of aspect ratio 6 at a Reynolds number Re = 3.0 × 106 (experimental data from Bullivant [23])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Impact of an off-centered turbine on its performance for a blockage ratio of ε = 12% and a reduced frequency of f* = 0.18. (a) Mean streamwise velocity profiles at an upstream distance of x = –2 c from the turbine. (b) Evolution of the instantaneous power coefficient on the oscillating cycle showing the differences on peak values between the downstroke and the upstroke.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Blockage correction of Barnsley and Wellicome applied to the present OFHT results CP*¯ (f*; ε) and CD¯ (f*; ε) and the corresponding hypothetical unconfined results CP′¯ ( f ′ ;  ε) and CD′¯ ( f ′ ;  ε)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Procedure to correlate the performance of an OFHT for different levels of blockage

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In