0
Journal of Fluids Engineering | Volume 138 | Issue 11 | research-article
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Physical Explanation of the Hysteresis in Wells Turbines: A Critical Reconsideration

[+] Author and Article Information
Tiziano Ghisu

Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical,
Chemical and Materials Engineering,
University of Cagliari,
Cagliari 09123, Italy
e-mail: t.ghisu@unica.it

Pierpaolo Puddu

Professor
Department of Mechanical,
Chemical and Materials Engineering,
University of Cagliari,
Cagliari 09123, Italy
e-mail: pierpaolo.puddu@dimcm.unica.it

Francesco Cambuli

Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical,
Chemical and Materials Engineering,
University of Cagliari,
Cagliari 09123, Italy
e-mail: cambuli.f@unica.it

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 7, 2015; final manuscript received March 15, 2016; published online July 15, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kwang-Yong Kim.

J. Fluids Eng 138(11), 111105 (Jul 15, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-15-1895; doi: 10.1115/1.4033320 History: Received December 07, 2015; Revised March 15, 2016
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

The hysteretic behavior of Wells turbines is a well-recognized phenomenon. As it appears at nondimensional frequencies orders of magnitude lower than the ones studied in rapidly pitching airfoils and wings, the cause is likely to be different. Some authors found its origin in the interaction between secondary flow structures and trailing edge vortices. In this work, a detailed numerical analysis of the performance of a Wells turbine submitted to a sinusoidal bidirectional flow is presented. Computational results are compared with experimental data available from literature and suggest a new explanation of the phenomenon.
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
Wells, A. , 1976, “ Fluid Driven Rotary Transducer,” BR Patent No. 1,595,700.
2
de, O. , Falcao, A. F. , 2010, “ Wave Energy Utilization: A Review of the Technologies,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 14(3), pp. 899–918. [CrossRef]
3
Gato, L. M. C. , and de, O. , Falcao, A. F. , 1988, “ Aerodynamics of the Wells Turbine,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 30(6), pp. 383–395. [CrossRef]
4
Gato, L. M. C. , and Webster, M. , 2001, “ An Experimental Investigation Into the Effect of Rotor Blade Sweep on the Performance of the Variable-Pitch Wells Turbine,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 215(5), pp. 611–622. [CrossRef]
5
Raghunathan, S. , 1995, “ The Wells Air Turbine for Wave Energy Conversion,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 31(4), pp. 335–386. [CrossRef]
6
Curran, R. , and Gato, L. M. C. , 1997, “ The Energy Conversion Performance of Several Types of Wells Turbine Designs,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 211(2), pp. 133–145. [CrossRef]
7
Govardhan, M. , and Dhanasekaran, T. S. , 1998, “ Effect of Guide Vanes on the Performance of a Variable Chord Self-Rectifying Air Turbine,” J. Therm. Sci., 7(4), pp. 209–217. [CrossRef]
8
Setoguchi, T. , Takao, M. , and Kaneko, K. , 1998, “ Hysteresis on Wells Turbine Characteristics in Reciprocating Flow,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 4(1), pp. 17–24. [CrossRef]
9
Kim, T. H. , Setoguchi, T. , Takao, M. , Kaneko, K. , and Santhakumar, S. , 2002, “ Study of Turbine With Self-Pitch-Controlled Blades for Wave Energy Conversion,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 41(1), pp. 101–107. [CrossRef]
10
Thakker, A. , and Abdulhadi, R. , 2007, “ Effect of Blade Profile on the Performance of Wells Turbine Under Unidirectional Sinusoidal and Real Sea Flow Conditions,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 2007, pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
11
Mala, K. , Jayaraj, J. , Jayashankar, V. , Muruganandam, T. , Santhakumar, S. , Ravindran, M. , Takao, M. , Setoguchi, T. , Toyota, K. , and Nagata, S. , 2011, “ A Twin Unidirectional Impulse Turbine Topology for OWC Based Wave Energy Plants—Experimental Validation and Scaling,” Renewable Energy, 36(1), pp. 307–314. [CrossRef]
12
Paderi, M. , and Puddu, P. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation in a Wells Turbine Under Bi-Directional Flow,” Renewable Energy, 57, pp. 570–576. [CrossRef]
13
Puddu, P. , Paderi, M. , and Manca, C. , 2014, “ Aerodynamic Characterization of a Wells Turbine Under Bi-Directional Airflow,” Energy Procedia, 45, pp. 278–287. [CrossRef]
14
Moisel, C. , and Carolus, T. , 2016, “ A Facility for Testing the Aerodynamic and Acoustic Performance of Bidirectional Air Turbines for Ocean Wave Energy Conversion,” Renewable Energy, 86, pp. 1340–1352. [CrossRef]
15
Kim, T. , Setoguchi, T. , Kinoue, Y. , and Kaneko, K. , 2001, “ Effects of Blade Geometry on Performance of Wells Turbine for Wave Power Conversion,” J. Therm. Sci., 10(4), pp. 293–300. [CrossRef]
16
Kim, T. , Setoguchi, T. , Kaneko, K. , and Raghunathan, S. , 2002, “ Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Blade Sweep on the Performance of Wells Turbine,” Renewable Energy, 25(2), pp. 235–248. [CrossRef]
17
Setoguchi, T. , Kinoue, Y. , Kim, T. H. , Kaneko, K. , and Inoue, M. , 2003, “ Hysteretic Characteristics of Wells Turbine for Wave Power Conversion,” Renewable Energy, 28(13), pp. 2113–2127. [CrossRef]
18
Kinoue, Y. , Setoguchi, T. , Kim, T. H. , Kaneko, K. , and Inoue, M. , 2003, “ Mechanism of Hysteretic Characteristics of Wells Turbine for Wave Power Conversion,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 125(2), pp. 302–307. [CrossRef]
19
Kinoue, Y. , Kim, T. H. , Setoguchi, T. , Mohammad, M. , Kaneko, K. , and Inoue, M. , 2004, “ Hysteretic Characteristics of Monoplane and Biplane Wells Turbine for Wave Power Conversion,” Energy Convers. Manage., 45(9–10), pp. 1617–1629. [CrossRef]
20
Dhanasekaran, T. S. , and Govardhan, M. , 2005, “ Computational Analysis of Performance and Flow Investigation on Wells Turbine for Wave Energy Conversion,” Renewable Energy, 30(14), pp. 2129–2147. [CrossRef]
21
Torresi, M. , Camporeale, S. M. , and Pascazio, G. , 2009, “ Detailed CFD Analysis of the Steady Flow in a Wells Turbine Under Incipient and Deep Stall Conditions,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 131(7), p. 071103. [CrossRef]
22
Gomes, R. , Henriques, J. , Gato, L. , and Falcão, A. , 2012, “ Hydrodynamic Optimization of an Axisymmetric Floating Oscillating Water Column for Wave Energy Conversion,” Renewable Energy, 44, pp. 328–339. [CrossRef]
23
Starzmann, R. , and Carolus, T. , 2013, “ Effect of Blade Skew Strategies on the Operating Range and Aeroacoustic Performance of the Wells Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(1), p. 011003. [CrossRef]
24
Soltanmohamadi, R. , and Lakzian, E. , 2015, “ Improved Design of Wells Turbine for Wave Energy Conversion Using Entropy Generation,” Meccanica.
25
Halder, P. , Samad, A. , Kim, J.-H. , and Choi, Y.-S. , 2015, “ High Performance Ocean Energy Harvesting Turbine Design—A New Casing Treatment Scheme,” Energy, 86, pp. 219–231. [CrossRef]
26
Shehata, A. , Saqr, K. , Xiao, Q. , Shehadeh, M. , and Day, A. , 2016, “ Performance Analysis of Wells Turbine Blades Using the Entropy Generation Minimization Method,” Renewable Energy, 86, pp. 1123–1133. [CrossRef]
27
Jumper, E. J. , Schreck, S. J. , and Dimmick, R. L. , 1987, “ Lift-Curve Characteristics for an Airfoil Pitching at Constant Rate,” J. Aircr., 24(10), pp. 680–687. [CrossRef]
28
Albertson, J. , Troutt, T. , and Kedzie, C. , 1988, “ Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces at Low Airfoil Pitching Rates,” AIAA Paper No. 88-2579-CP.
29
Ekaterinaris, J. A. , 1995, “ Numerical Investigation of Dynamic Stall of an Oscillating Wing,” AIAA J., 33(10), pp. 1803–1808. [CrossRef]
30
Barakos, G. N. , and Drikakis, D. , 2003, “ Computational Study of Unsteady Turbulent Flows Around Oscillating and Ramping Aerofoils,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 42(2), pp. 163–186. [CrossRef]
31
Wang, S. , Ingham, D. B. , Ma, L. , Pourkashanian, M. , and Tao, Z. , 2010, “ Numerical Investigations on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Oscillating Airfoils,” Comput. Fluids, 39(9), pp. 1529–1541. [CrossRef]
32
Cunningham, A., Jr. , and den Boer, R. , 1994, “ Steady and Unsteady Aerodynamics of a Pitching Straked Wing Model at High Angles of Attack,” AGARD CP-535, Brussels, Belgium, Oct. 4–7, J. Albertson , T. Troutt , and C. Kedzie , eds.
33
Muthukumar, A. , and Poddar, K. , 2008, “ Fluid Flow Phenomena over the Low Pitch Rate Cambered Airfoil,” 5th WSEAS International Conference on Fluid Mechanics, Acapulco, Mexico, Jan. 25–27.
34
Ghisu, T. , Puddu, P. , and Cambuli, F. , 2015, “ Numerical Analysis of a Wells Turbine at Different Nondimensional Piston Frequencies,” J. Therm. Sci., 24(6), pp. 535–543. [CrossRef]
35
Tyacke, J. C. , and Tucker, P. G. , 2014, “ Future Use of Large Eddy Simulation in Aeroengines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(8), p. 081005. [CrossRef]
36
Wahba, E. , Gadalla, M. , Abueidda, D. , Dalaq, A. , Hafiz, H. , Elawadi, K. , and Issa, R. , 2014, “ On the Performance of Air-Lift Pumps: From Analytical Models to Large Eddy Simulation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 136(11), p. 111301. [CrossRef]
37
Im, H. S. , Zha, G. C. , and Dano, B. , 2014, “ Large Eddy Simulation of Coflow Jet Airfoil at High Angle of Attack,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 136(2), p. 021101. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational domain, simplified geometry

+Computational domain, simplified geometry
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Computational domain, simplified geometry
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Computational domain, full geometry

+Computational domain, full geometry
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Computational domain, full geometry
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Computational mesh for the moving reference frame: (a) blade and hub surface mesh and (b) close-up view of the hub

+Computational mesh for the moving reference frame: (a) blade and hub surface mesh and (b) close-up view of the hub
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Computational mesh for the moving reference frame: (a) blade and hub surface mesh and (b) close-up view of the hub
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Steady simulations (six-blade configuration, σt = 0.57)

+Steady simulations (six-blade configuration, σt = 0.57)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Steady simulations (six-blade configuration, σt = 0.57)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Influence of time step size in transient simulations: (a) Δt = 2 × 10−2 s, (b) Δt = 5 × 10−3 s, and (c) Δt = 1.25 × 10–3 s

+Influence of time step size in transient simulations: (a) Δt = 2 × 10−2 s, (b) Δt = 5 × 10−3 s, and (c) Δt = 1.25 × 10–3 s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Influence of time step size in transient simulations: (a) Δt = 2 × 10−2 s, (b) Δt = 5 × 10−3 s, and (c) Δt = 1.25 × 10–3 s
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison between experimental and computational results (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)

+Comparison between experimental and computational results (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison between experimental and computational results (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)

+Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Local flow coefficient ϕl as a function of flow coefficient ϕ (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)

+Local flow coefficient ϕl as a function of flow coefficient ϕ (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Local flow coefficient ϕl as a function of flow coefficient ϕ (six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Spanwise distribution of axial velocity during acceleration and deceleration, for the same values of flow coefficient ϕ, during outflow: (a) ϕ=0.09 and (b) ϕ=0.18

+Spanwise distribution of axial velocity during acceleration and deceleration, for the same values of flow coefficient ϕ, during outflow: (a) ϕ=0.09 and (b) ϕ=0.18
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Spanwise distribution of axial velocity during acceleration and deceleration, for the same values of flow coefficient ϕ, during outflow: (a) ϕ=0.09 and (b) ϕ=0.18
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Spanwise distribution of axial velocity during acceleration and deceleration, for equal inlet mass-flows, during outflow: (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214

+Spanwise distribution of axial velocity during acceleration and deceleration, for equal inlet mass-flows, during outflow: (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Spanwise distribution of axial velocity during acceleration and deceleration, for equal inlet mass-flows, during outflow: (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Midspan pressure coefficient distributions during acceleration and deceleration, for the same values of flow coefficient ϕ (left) and for the same values of local flow coefficient ϕl (right), during outflow: (a) ϕ=0.09, (b) ϕl=0.096, (c) ϕ=0.18, and (d) ϕl=0.214

+Midspan pressure coefficient distributions during acceleration and deceleration, for the same values of flow coefficient ϕ (left) and for the same values of local flow coefficient ϕl (right), during outflow: (a) ϕ=0.09, (b) ϕl=0.096, (c) ϕ=0.18, and (d) ϕl=0.214
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Midspan pressure coefficient distributions during acceleration and deceleration, for the same values of flow coefficient ϕ (left) and for the same values of local flow coefficient ϕl (right), during outflow: (a) ϕ=0.09, (b) ϕl=0.096, (c) ϕ=0.18, and (d) ϕl=0.214
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of nondimensionalized relative velocity contours during acceleration (left) and deceleration (right), at different radial positions (r*): (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214

+Comparison of nondimensionalized relative velocity contours during acceleration (left) and deceleration (right), at different radial positions (r*): (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison of nondimensionalized relative velocity contours during acceleration (left) and deceleration (right), at different radial positions (r*): (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Nondimensionalized tangential vorticity contours at ϕl=0.096 during acceleration (left) and during deceleration (right), at planes with different tangential positions: (a) 35% chord, (b) 70% chord, and (c) 90% chord

+Nondimensionalized tangential vorticity contours at ϕl=0.096 during acceleration (left) and during deceleration (right), at planes with different tangential positions: (a) 35% chord, (b) 70% chord, and (c) 90% chord
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Nondimensionalized tangential vorticity contours at ϕl=0.096 during acceleration (left) and during deceleration (right), at planes with different tangential positions: (a) 35% chord, (b) 70% chord, and (c) 90% chord
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Nondimensionalized tangential vorticity contours at ϕl=0.214 during acceleration (left) and during deceleration (right), at planes with different tangential positions: (a) 35% chord, (b) 70% chord, and (c) 90% chord

+Nondimensionalized tangential vorticity contours at ϕl=0.214 during acceleration (left) and during deceleration (right), at planes with different tangential positions: (a) 35% chord, (b) 70% chord, and (c) 90% chord
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Nondimensionalized tangential vorticity contours at ϕl=0.214 during acceleration (left) and during deceleration (right), at planes with different tangential positions: (a) 35% chord, (b) 70% chord, and (c) 90% chord
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Pathlines near the blade suction side during acceleration (left) and deceleration (right) for the six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57, for different values of ϕl : (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214.

+Pathlines near the blade suction side during acceleration (left) and deceleration (right) for the six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57, for different values of ϕl : (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Pathlines near the blade suction side during acceleration (left) and deceleration (right) for the six-blade turbine, σt = 0.57, for different values of ϕl : (a) ϕl=0.096 and (b) ϕl=0.214.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparison between experimental and computational results (five-blade turbine, σt = 0.48)

+Comparison between experimental and computational results (five-blade turbine, σt = 0.48)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison between experimental and computational results (five-blade turbine, σt = 0.48)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison between experimental and computational results (seven-blade turbine, σt = 0.67)

+Comparison between experimental and computational results (seven-blade turbine, σt = 0.67)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison between experimental and computational results (seven-blade turbine, σt = 0.67)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Local flow coefficient ϕl as a function of flow coefficient ϕ (five- and seven-blade turbines, σt = 0.48 and σt = 0.67)

+Local flow coefficient ϕl as a function of flow coefficient ϕ (five- and seven-blade turbines, σt = 0.48 and σt = 0.67)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Local flow coefficient ϕl as a function of flow coefficient ϕ (five- and seven-blade turbines, σt = 0.48 and σt = 0.67)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (five-blade turbine, σt = 0.48)

+Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (five-blade turbine, σt = 0.48)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (five-blade turbine, σt = 0.48)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (seven-blade turbine, σt = 0.67)

+Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (seven-blade turbine, σt = 0.67)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Computational performance as a function of local flow variables (seven-blade turbine, σt = 0.67)

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines> Chapter 5
Introduction
Turbine Aerodynamics: Axial-Flow and Radial-Flow Turbine Design and Analysis> Chapter 1
Other Components and Variations
Axial-Flow Compressors> Chapter 13
Boundary Layer Analysis
Centrifugal Compressors: A Strategy for Aerodynamic Design and Analysis
Potential Flow Analysis in the Blade-to-Blade Plane
Centrifugal Compressors: A Strategy for Aerodynamic Design and Analysis
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
Sign In