Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Gerotor Lubricating Pumps at High-Speed: Geometric Features Influencing the Filling Capability

[+] Author and Article Information
Giorgio Altare

Dipartimento Energia,
Politecnico di Torino,
Torino 10129, Italy
e-mail: giorgio.altare@polito.it

Massimo Rundo

Dipartimento Energia,
Politecnico di Torino,
Torino 10129, Italy
e-mail: massimo.rundo@polito.it

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received October 21, 2015; final manuscript received May 13, 2016; published online July 15, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Bart van Esch.

J. Fluids Eng 138(11), 111101 (Jul 15, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: FE-15-1757; doi: 10.1115/1.4033675 History: Received October 21, 2015; Revised May 13, 2016

The paper presents an extensive analysis of the influence on the suction capacity of the main geometric parameters of gerotor lubricating pumps. The study was carried out using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model developed with the commercial software PumpLinx®. The model of a reference gerotor unit was validated experimentally in terms of delivered flow rate in different operating conditions, in open and closed circuit configuration. In the former case, different geometries of the inlet pipe were tested. In the latter, the influence of the suction pressure at constant speed was analyzed. After the model validation, several geometric features were changed to assess their influence on the volumetric efficiency in conditions of incomplete filling, such as the thickness and the diameter of the gears, the position of the inlet pipe with respect to the rotors (radial, axial, and tangential), and the shape of the port plate.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Rotor's dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Clearance definition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Detail of the mesh for the leakages

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Hydraulic circuit according to International Organization for Standardization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pump under test in closed circuit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Flow-pressure curves at 2000 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Simulated versus experimental flow-pressure curves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Flow—speed curves in open circuit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Characteristic curves of the inlet pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Effect of the inlet direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Effect of the delay angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Flow versus speed as function of the delay angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Effect of the pump displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Rotor with different external diameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Effect of the external diameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Suction flow area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Rotors with different axial heights

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Effect of axial height

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Rotors with different numbers of chambers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Effect of the number of chambers




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In