0
Journal of Fluids Engineering | Volume 139 | Issue 1 | research-article
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Modeling of Hydrophobic Surfaces by the Stokes Problem With the Stick–Slip Boundary Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
R. Kučera

IT4Innovations,
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: radek.kucera@vsb.cz

V. Šátek

IT4Innovations,
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: vaclav.satek@vsb.cz

J. Haslinger

IG CAS,
Studentská 1768,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 00, Czech Republic
e-mail: hasling@karlin.mff.cuni.cz

S. Fialová

Victor Kaplan Department of Fluid Engineering,
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: fialova@fme.vutbr.cz

F. Pochylý

Victor Kaplan Department of Fluid Engineering,
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: pochyly@fme.vutbr.cz

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 3, 2016; final manuscript received July 12, 2016; published online October 10, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Matevz Dular.

J. Fluids Eng 139(1), 011202 (Oct 10, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1073; doi: 10.1115/1.4034199 History: Received February 03, 2016; Revised July 12, 2016
Article
References
Figures
Tables

Unlike the Navier boundary condition, this paper deals with the case when the slip of a fluid along the wall may occur only when the shear stress attains certain bound which is given a priori and does not depend on the solution itself. The mathematical model of the velocity–pressure formulation with this type of threshold slip boundary condition is given by the so-called variational inequality of the second kind. For its discretization, we use P1-bubble/P1 mixed finite elements. The resulting algebraic problem leads to the minimization of a nondifferentiable energy function subject to linear equality constraints representing the discrete impermeability and incompressibility condition. To release the former one and to regularize the nonsmooth term characterizing the stick–slip behavior of the algebraic formulation, two additional vectors of Lagrange multipliers are introduced. Further, the velocity vector is eliminated, and the resulting minimization problem for a quadratic function depending on the dual variables (the discrete pressure and the normal and shear stress) is solved by the interior point type method which is briefly described. To justify the threshold model and to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed approach, three physically realistic problems are solved and the results are compared with the ones solving the Stokes problem with the Navier boundary condition.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Comparison of κnum and κs at xc and (b) dependence of |ut(xc)| on the slip bound g

+(a) Comparison of κnum and κs at xc and (b) dependence of |ut(xc)| on the slip bound g
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
(a) Comparison of κnum and κs at xc and (b) dependence of |ut(xc)| on the slip bound g
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of the channel Ω with diameter d = 0.015 (m) and length L = 1 (m)

+Geometry of the channel Ω with diameter d = 0.015 (m) and length L = 1 (m)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Geometry of the channel Ω with diameter d = 0.015 (m) and length L = 1 (m)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Dependence of the hydraulic losses on the adhesive coefficient κnum

+Dependence of the hydraulic losses on the adhesive coefficient κnum
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Dependence of the hydraulic losses on the adhesive coefficient κnum
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Outflow velocity profiles: (a) the same value of g on both parts of γC and (b) different values of g:=g1 on γC,1 and fixed value g = 1 on γC,2 lead to the sticking effect on γC,2. The values κs:=κs(xc) are computed by Eqs. (2) and (23).

+Outflow velocity profiles: (a) the same value of g on both parts of γC and (b) different values of g:=g1 on γC,1 and fixed value g = 1 on γC,2 lead to the sticking effect on γC,2. The values κs:=κs(xc) are computed by Eqs. (2) and (23).
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Outflow velocity profiles: (a) the same value of g on both parts of γC and (b) different values of g:=g1 on γC,1 and fixed value g = 1 on γC,2 lead to the sticking effect on γC,2. The values κs:=κs(xc) are computed by Eqs. (2) and (23).
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Rotating cylinder γD and the stick–slip boundary conditions on γC and (b) comparison of κs and κnum on γC

+(a) Rotating cylinder γD and the stick–slip boundary conditions on γC and (b) comparison of κs and κnum on γC
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
(a) Rotating cylinder γD and the stick–slip boundary conditions on γC and (b) comparison of κs and κnum on γC
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dependence of ut on (a) the slip bound g and (b) the adhesive coefficient κnum

+Dependence of ut on (a) the slip bound g and (b) the adhesive coefficient κnum
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Dependence of ut on (a) the slip bound g and (b) the adhesive coefficient κnum
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Distribution of (a) adhesive coefficient κs and (b) tangential velocity ut on γC for g = 0.18094

+Distribution of (a) adhesive coefficient κs and (b) tangential velocity ut on γC for g = 0.18094
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Distribution of (a) adhesive coefficient κs and (b) tangential velocity ut on γC for g = 0.18094
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Distribution of (a) shear stress |σt| and (b) tangential velocity ut on γC for g = 1.60313

+Distribution of (a) shear stress |σt| and (b) tangential velocity ut on γC for g = 1.60313
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Distribution of (a) shear stress |σt| and (b) tangential velocity ut on γC for g = 1.60313
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The distribution of |σt| on γC for g = 50

+The distribution of |σt| on γC for g = 50
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The distribution of |σt| on γC for g = 50
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Zoomed velocity fields u

+Zoomed velocity fields u
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Zoomed velocity fields u
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Distribution of the pressure p on γC

+Distribution of the pressure p on γC
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Distribution of the pressure p on γC
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Example: (a) eccentric rotating cylinder and (b) zoom of the mesh

+Example: (a) eccentric rotating cylinder and (b) zoom of the mesh
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Example: (a) eccentric rotating cylinder and (b) zoom of the mesh

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Completing the Picture
Air Engines> Chapter 11
Introduction
Axial-Flow Compressors> Chapter 1
List of Commercial Codes
Introduction to Finite Element, Boundary Element, and Meshless Methods
Later Single-Cylinder Engines
Air Engines> Chapter 3
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In