0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Analysis of the Leakage Behavior of Francis Turbines and Its Impact on the Hydraulic Efficiency—A Validation of an Analytical Model Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Results

[+] Author and Article Information
Jürgen Schiffer

Institute of Hydraulic Fluid Machinery,
Graz University of Technology,
Kopernikusgasse 24/IV,
Graz 8010, Austria
e-mail: juergen.schiffer@tugraz.at

Helmut Benigni

Institute of Hydraulic Fluid Machinery,
Graz University of Technology,
Kopernikusgasse 24/IV,
Graz 8010, Austria
e-mail: helmut.benigni@tugraz.at

Helmut Jaberg

Institute of Hydraulic Fluid Machinery,
Graz University of Technology,
Kopernikusgasse 24/IV,
Graz 8010, Austria
e-mail: helmut.jaberg@tugraz.at

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 17, 2015; final manuscript received September 2, 2016; published online December 7, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Bart van Esch.

J. Fluids Eng 139(2), 021106 (Dec 07, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: FE-15-1931; doi: 10.1115/1.4034865 History: Received December 17, 2015; Revised September 02, 2016

The present contribution addresses the analysis of the leakage behavior of a small hydro Francis turbine using an analytical approach, which was validated based on the results of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). For a custom-designed Francis turbine with a specific speed of nq = 41.9 rpm, the flow chambers resulting from the labyrinth geometry were added to a traditional full CFD model of the turbine and numerical simulations were performed for several operation points ranging from part load (Qmin = 0.5 × Qopt) to over load (Qmax = 1.3 × Qopt). Consequently, the single losses occurring in the runner seals on crown and band side as well as the pressure distribution within the runner side spaces could be evaluated and compared to the results gained with an analytical approach, which was originally developed to calculate the leakage flow of centrifugal pumps. The comparison of the pressure distribution achieved with the numerical simulation and the analytical calculation shows that both approaches match well if the angular velocity of the fluid ωFluid trapped in the runner side spaces is calculated in an appropriate way. Furthermore, the achieved results demonstrate that the use of the analytical model enables the calculation of the disk friction and leakage losses with sufficient accuracy. This paper contributes to the improvement of the performance prediction of Francis turbines based on combined numerical and analytical calculations.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

View into the spiral case and distributor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Meshes around the labyrinth region of the runner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mesh detail—runner seal on crown side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Mesh detail—runner seal on band side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Turbine model view from the top

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Visualization of the runner mesh with the corresponding labyrinth seals on crown and band side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Convergence history for the BEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Hydraulic turbine efficiency ηIEC and loss analysis based on (Eq. (4)) for various operation points at a constant turbine head of H = 125 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Loss analysis based on (Eq. (4)) at the BEP for different mesh qualities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Francis runner with contour plot showing rotation factor kro as the ratio of “ωFluid/ωRunner” and three-dimensional streamlines within the runner side space on crown side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Rotation factor krot calculated for the seal region on crown side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure distribution in the seal region on crown side based on a numerical and analytical approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pressure distribution in the seal region on band side based on a numerical and analytical approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Overview of the analytical and numerical results for disk friction (referring to BEP)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Overview of the analytical and numerical results for leakage (referring to BEP)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In