0
Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

Probing and Imaging of Vapor–Water Mixture Properties Inside Partial/Cloud Cavitating Flows

[+] Author and Article Information
Churui Wan

Department of Engineering Mechanics,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: jsvan@sjtu.edu.cn

Benlong Wang

Department of Engineering Mechanics,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China;
MOE Key Laboratory of Hydrodynamics (SJTU),
Shanghai 200240, China;
Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced
Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration (CISSE),
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: benlongwang@sjtu.edu.cn

Qian Wang

Department of Engineering Mechanics,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: woshidaqianye@126.com

Yongliu Fang

Department of Engineering Mechanics,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China;
MOE Key Laboratory of Hydrodynamics (SJTU),
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: ylfang@sjtu.edu.cn

Hua Liu

Department of Engineering Mechanics,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 00240, China;
MOE Key Laboratory of Hydrodynamics (SJTU),
Shanghai 200240, China;
Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced
Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration (CISSE),
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: hliu@sjtu.edu.cn

Guoping Zhang

China Ship Scientific Research Center,
Wuxi 214082, China
e-mail: zhanggp_cssrc@163.com

Lianghao Xu

China Ship Scientific Research Center,
Wuxi 214082, China
e-mail: xu_702@163.com

Xiaoxing Peng

China Ship Scientific Research Center,
Wuxi 214082, China
e-mail: henrypxx@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 6, 2016; final manuscript received October 6, 2016; published online January 19, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Mark R. Duignan.

J. Fluids Eng 139(3), 031303 (Jan 19, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1221; doi: 10.1115/1.4035013 History: Received April 06, 2016; Revised October 06, 2016

Experimental results of the void fraction, statistical chord length distribution (CLD), and bubble size distribution (BSD) inside and downstream of hydrodynamic cavities are presented at the laboratory scale. Various cavitating flows have been intensively studied in water tunnels for several decades, but no corresponding quantitative CLD and BSD data were reported. This experimental study is aimed at elaboration of a general approach to measure CLD in typical cavitating flows. Dual-tip electrical impedance probe (dtEIP) is used to measure the void fraction and CLD in different cavitation flows over a flat plate, including both supercavitation and sheet/cloud cavitation. For supercavitating flows, the void fraction of vapor is unity in the major cavity region. In contrast, the maximum void fraction inside the sheet/cloud cavitation region is less than unity in the present studies. The high vapor concentration region is located in the center of the cavity region. Based on the experimental data of CLD, it is found that the mean chord lengths are around 2.9–4.8 mm and 1.9–4.4 mm in the center region and closure region, respectively. The backward converting bubble diameters at the peak of BSD have similar magnitude, with probability density values exceeding 0.2. Empirical parameters of CLD and BSD are obtained for different cavity regions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Brennen, C. , 1995, Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics, Oxford University Press, New York.
Lee, I. , Mäkiharju, S. , Ganesh, H. , and Ceccio, S. , 2016, “ Scaling of Gas Diffusion Into Limited Partial Cavities,” ASME J. Fluid Eng., 138(5), p. 051301. [CrossRef]
Blake, J. , and Gibson, D. , 1987, “ Cavitation Bubbles Near Boundaries,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 19(1), pp. 99–123. [CrossRef]
Brennen, C. , 2005, Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Gopalan, S. , and Katz, J. , 2000, “ Flow Structure and Modeling Issues in the Closure Region of Attached Cavitation,” Phys. Fluids., 12(4), pp. 895–911. [CrossRef]
Fuster, D. , and Colonius, T. , 2011, “ Modelling Bubble Clusters in Compressible Liquids,” J. Fluid Mech., 688, pp. 352–389. [CrossRef]
Hsiao, C. , and Chahine, G. , 2012, “ Effect of a Propeller and Gas Diffusion on Bubble Nuclei Distribution in a Liquid,” J. Hydrodyn., 24(6), pp. 809–822. [CrossRef]
Ma, J. , Hsiao, C. , and Chahine, G. , 2015, “ Euler-Lagrange Simulations of Bubble Cloud Dynamics Near a Wall,” ASME J. Fluid Eng., 137(4), p. 041301. [CrossRef]
Chahine, G. , Franc, J. , and Karimi, A. , 2014, “ Cavitation and Cavitation Erosion,” Advanced Experimental and Numerical Techniques for Cavitation Erosion Prediction, Springer Science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Ceccio, S. , and Brennen, S. , 1991, “ Observations of the Dynamics and Acoustics of Travelling Bubble Cavitation,” J. Fluid Mech., 233, pp. 633–660. [CrossRef]
Coutier-Delgosha, O. , Devillers, J. , and Pichon, T. , 2006, “ Internal Structure and Dynamics of Sheet Cavitation,” Phys. Fluids, 18(1), p. 017103. [CrossRef]
Coutier-Delgosha, O. , Stutz, B. , Vabre, A. , and Legoupil, S. , 2007, “ Analysis of Cavitating Flow Structure by Experimental and Numerical Investigations,” J. Fluid Mech., 578, pp. 171–222. [CrossRef]
Mäkiharju, S. , Gabillet, C. , Paik, B. , Chang, N. , Perlin, M. , and Ceccio, S. , 2013, “ Time-Resolved two-Dimensional X-Ray Densitometry of a Two-Phase Flow Downstream of a Ventilated Cavity,” Exp. Fluids, 54(7), p. 1561. [CrossRef]
Chang, N. , Ganesh, H. , Yakushiji, H. , and Ceccio, S. , 2011, “ Tip Vortex Cavitation Suppression by Active Mass Injection,” ASME J. Fluid Eng., 133(11), p. 111301. [CrossRef]
Pennings, S. , Westerweel, J. , and van Terwisga, T. , 2015, “ Flow Field Measurement Around Vortex Cavitation,” Exp. Fluids, 56(11), p. 206. [CrossRef]
Ceccio, S. , and George, D. , 1996, “ A Review of Electrical Impedance Techniques for the Measurement of Multiphase Flows,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 118(2), pp. 391–399. [CrossRef]
Besagni, G. , Guédon, G. , and Inzoli, F. , 2015, “ Annular Gap Bubble Column: Experimental Investigation and Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling,” ASME J. Fluid Eng., 138(1), p. 011302. [CrossRef]
Lamarre, E. , and Melville, W. , 1993, “ Void-Fraction Measurements and Sound-Speed Fields in Bubble Plumes Generated by Breaking Waves,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95(3), pp. 1317–1328. [CrossRef]
Blenkinsopp, C. , and Chaplin, J. , 2007, “ Void Fraction Measurements in Breaking Waves,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 463(2088), pp. 3151–3170. [CrossRef]
Gabillet, C. , Colin, C. , and Fabre, J. , 2002, “ Experimental Study of Bubble Injection in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 28(4), pp. 553–578. [CrossRef]
Stutz, B. , and Reboud, J. , 1997, “ Two-Phase Flow Structure of Sheet Cavitation,” Phys. Fluids, 9(12), pp. 3678–3686. [CrossRef]
Stutz, B. , and Reboud, J. , 1997, “ Experiments on Unsteady Cavitation,” Exp. Fluids, 22(3), pp. 191–198. [CrossRef]
Stutz, B. , and Legoupil, S. , 2003, “ X-Ray Measurements Within Unsteady Cavitation,” Exp. Fluids, 35(2), pp. 130–138. [CrossRef]
Dias, S. , Franca, F. , and Rosa, E. , 2000, “ Statistical Method to Calculate Local Interfacial Variables in Two-Phase Bubbly Flows Using Intrusive Crossing Probes,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 26(11), pp. 1797–1830. [CrossRef]
Buwa, V. , and Ranade, V. , 2005, “ Characterization of Gas-Liquid Flows in Rectangular Bubble Columns Using Conductivity Probes,” Chem. Eng. Commun., 192(9), pp. 1129–1150. [CrossRef]
Briancon-Marjollet, L. , Franc, J. , and Michel, J. , 1990, “ Transient Bubbles Interacting With an Attached Cavity and the Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 218, pp. 355–376. [CrossRef]
Clark, N. , and Turton, R. , 1988, “ Chord Length Distributions Related to Bubble Size Distributions in Multiphase Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 14(4), pp. 413–424. [CrossRef]
Rüdisüli, M. , Schildhauer, T. , Biollaz, S. , and von Ommen, R. , 2012, “ Monte Carlo Simulation of the Bubble Size Distribution in a Fluidized Bed With Intrusive Probes,” Int. J. Multiphase Flows, 44, pp. 1–14.
Liu, W. , and Clark, N. , 1995, “ Relationship Between Distribution of Chord Lengths and Distribution of Bubble Sizes Including Their Statistical Parameters,” Int. J. Multiphase Flows, 21(6), pp. 1073–1089. [CrossRef]
Hoang, N. , Euh, D. , Yun, B. , and Song, C.-H. , 2015, “ A New Method of Relating a Chord Length Distribution to a Bubble Size Distribution for Vertical Bubbly Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flows, 71, pp. 23–31. [CrossRef]
Liu, W. , Clark, N. , and Karmavruc, A. , 1998, “ Relationship Between Bubble Size Distribution and Chord Length Distribution in Heterogeneously Bubbling Systems,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 53(6), pp. 1267–1276. [CrossRef]
Clift, R. , Grace, J. , and Weber, M. , 1978, Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, Academic Press, New York.
Knapp, R. , Daily, J. , and Hammitt, F. , 1970, Cavitation, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Mendelson, H. , 1967, “ The Prediction of Bubble Terminal Velocities From Wave Theory,” AIChE J., 13(2), pp. 250–253. [CrossRef]
Kawanami, Y. , Kato, H. , and Yamaguchi, H. , 1998, “ Three-Dimensional Characteristics of the Cavities Formed on a Two-Dimensional Hydrofoil,” 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, pp. 191–196.
Kjeldsen, M. , Arndt, R. , and Effertz, M. , 2000, “ Spectral Characteristics of Sheet/Cloud Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluid Eng., 122(3), pp. 481–487. [CrossRef]
Franc, J. , and Michel, J. , 2004, Fundamentals of Cavitation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Knapp, R. , and A. , H. , 1948, “ Laboratory Investigations of the Mechanism of Cavitation,” Trans. ASME, 70, pp. 419–435.
White, F. , 2006, Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Brennen, C. , 2002, “ Fission of Collapsing Cavitation Bubbles,” J. Fluid Mech., 472, pp. 153–166. [CrossRef]
Frost, D. , 1985, “ Effects of Ambient Pressure on the Instability of a Liquid Boiling Explosively at the Superheat Limit,” Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of the experimental setup: the cavitation tunnel and the plate. We choose a 45 deg wedge with a sharp edge to provide a clean definition of the separation point and leading edge of the cavity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Geometry of the dtEIP. Bottom panels show the microphotographs of the two probe tips.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Snapshots of the bubble distributions using a high-speed camera at 400 frames per second; the time lag between two consecutive images is 25 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Distribution of velocity of various bubbles within one series of measurements. Blue points represent the data of the high-speed camera. For reference, the theoretical terminal velocity of air bubbles in pure water is plotted as a dashed line, and the empirical terminal velocity in tap water is plotted as a solid line [32].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Probability distribution of the chord length and diameter. μ=0.47 and σ=0.50. Bar: the directly measured raw data of the chord length; dashed line: normal distribution of the chord length, Pc(c;μ,σ); and solid line: spherical-corrected probability distribution Pp(d) using Eq. (2).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Distribution of the pressure and the standard deviation. The saturated pressure Ps is shown as a thick dashed line for reference.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pressure histories at locations #3 to #6: (a) σv = 1.60 and (b) σv = 1.77

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Instantaneous high-speed camera pictures of fluid structures at different cavitation numbers: (a) σv = 1.54, (b) σv = 1.60, (c) σv = 1.70, and (d) σv = 1.77

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Averaged gray level of 2000 frames from the high-speed camera video: (a) σ = 1.60 and (b) σ = 1.77

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time-averaged distributions of the void fraction α are shown in black lines, inside the cavity region enclosed with a thick line. Cavitation number σv= 1.54, 1.60, 1.70, and 1.77 from top to bottom. The standard deviation of the void fraction is shown as thin lines. The solid and dash lines in green show the thickness of turbulent boundary layer δ defined with fluid properties of liquid phase and vapor phase, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experimental data of CLD and fitting curves according to the log normal law at the sample positions #3 and #4, corresponding to x = 18 and 24 cm. The vertical coordinate z of the probe is shown in the legend. (a) σv = 1.54, (b) σv = 1.60, and (c) σv = 1.77.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Density distribution of the bubble size along the vertical coordinate z in millimeter as indicated in the legends, at four different horizontal sites #1 to #4 along the plate surface corresponding to x= 6 cm, 12 cm, 18 cm, and 24 cm downstream of the separation corner of the plate. The vertical lines in the top of each figure indicate the corresponding mean chord length cM. (a) σv = 1.54, (b) σv = 1.60, and (c) σv = 1.77.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Two distinct density distributions of bubble size at the main region of sheet cavitation (a) and the closure region (b). Red asterisks represent experimental data for the supercavitation case σv=1.54, and blue circles and green plus signs are the experimental data for σv=1.60 and 1.77. (a) Solid line is empirical formulation with μ=1.06 and σ=0.67. (b) Dashed line is empirical formulation with μ=0.52 and σ=0.68.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In