Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

Direct Numerical Simulation of Pebble Bed Flows: Database Development and Investigation of Low-Frequency Temporal Instabilities

[+] Author and Article Information
Lambert H. Fick

Department of Nuclear Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845
e-mail: Lambert.Fick@tamu.edu

Elia Merzari

Nuclear Engineering Division,
Argonne National Laboratory,
Lemont, IL 60439

Yassin A. Hassan

Department of Nuclear Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77845

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received June 1, 2016; final manuscript received November 14, 2016; published online February 20, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Francine Battaglia.The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.

J. Fluids Eng 139(5), 051301 (Feb 20, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1337; doi: 10.1115/1.4035300 History: Received June 01, 2016; Revised November 14, 2016

Computational analyses of fluid flow through packed pebble bed domains using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) framework have had limited success in the past. Because of a lack of high-fidelity experimental or computational data, optimization of Reynolds-averaged closure models for these geometries has not been extensively developed. In the present study, direct numerical simulation (DNS) was employed to develop a high-fidelity database that can be used for optimizing Reynolds-averaged closure models for pebble bed flows. A face-centered cubic (FCC) domain with periodic boundaries was used. Flow was simulated at a Reynolds number of 9308 and cross-verified by using available quasi-DNS data. During the simulations, low-frequency instability modes were observed that affected the stationary solution. These instabilities were investigated by using the method of proper orthogonal decomposition, and a correlation was found between the time-dependent asymmetry of the averaged velocity profile data and the behavior of the highest-energy eigenmodes. Finally, the effects of the domain size and the method of averaging were investigated to determine how these parameters influenced the stationary solution. A violation of the ergodicity assumption was observed.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Fütterer, M. A. , Fu, L. , Sink, C. , de Groot, S. , Pouchon, M. , Kim, Y. W. , Carré, F. , and Tachibana, Y. , 2014, “ Status of the Very High Temperature Reactor System,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 77, pp. 266–281. [CrossRef]
Sabharwall, P. , Bragg-Sitton, S. M. , and Stoots, C. , 2013, “ Challenges in the Development of High Temperature Reactors,” Energy Convers. Manage., 74, pp. 574–581. [CrossRef]
Lohnert, G. , 1990, “ Technical Design Features and Essential Safety-Related Properties of the HTR-Module,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 121(2), pp. 259–275. [CrossRef]
Lee, J. Y. , and Lee, S. Y. , 2008, “ Flow Visualization of Pebble Bed HTGR,” ASME Paper No. HTR2008-58063.
Hassan, Y. A. , 2008, “ Large Eddy Simulation in Pebble Bed Gas Cooled Core Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(3), pp. 530–537. [CrossRef]
Eisfeld, B. , and Schnitzlein, K. , 2001, “ The Influence of Confining Walls on the Pressure Drop in Packed Beds,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(14), pp. 4321–4329. [CrossRef]
du Toit, C. G. , and Rousseau, P. G. , 2012, “ Modeling the Flow and Heat Transfer in a Packed Bed High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor in the Context of a Systems CFD Approach,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 134(3), p. 031015. [CrossRef]
Rousseau, P. , du Toit, C. , and Landman, W. , 2006, “ Validation of a Transient Thermal-Fluid Systems CFD Model for a Packed Bed High Temperature Gas-Cooled Nuclear Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 236(5–6), pp. 555–564. [CrossRef]
Shams, A. , Roelofs, F. , Komen, E. , and Baglietto, E. , 2012, “ Quasi-Direct Numerical Simulation of a Pebble Bed Configuration—Part I: Flow (Velocity) Field Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 263, pp. 473–489. [CrossRef]
Shams, A. , Roelofs, F. , Komen, E. M. J. , and Baglietto, E. , 2012, “ Optimization of a Pebble Bed Configuration for Quasi-Direct Numerical Simulation,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 242, pp. 331–340. [CrossRef]
Hassan, Y. A. , and Dominguez-Ontiveros, E. E. , 2008, “ Flow Visualization in a Pebble Bed Reactor Experiment Using PIV and Refractive Index Matching Techniques,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(11), pp. 3080–3085. [CrossRef]
Merzari, E. , Pointer, W. D. , Smith, J. G. , Tentner, A. , and Fischer, P. , 2012, “ Numerical Simulation of the Flow in Wire-Wrapped Pin Bundles: Effect of Pin-Wire Contact Modeling,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 253, pp. 374–386. [CrossRef]
Tavakol, M. , Abouali, O. , and Yaghoubi, M. , 2015, “ Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Around a Wall Mounted Hemisphere,” Appl. Math. Modell., 39(13), pp. 3596–3618. [CrossRef]
Rodriguez, I. , Borell, R. , Lehmkuhl, O. , Segarra, C. D. P. , and Oliva, A. , 2011, “ Direct Numerical Simulation of the Flow Over a Sphere at Re = 3700,” J. Fluid Mech., 679, pp. 263–287. [CrossRef]
Constantinescu, G. S. , and Squires, K. D. , 2003, “ LES and DES Investigations of Turbulent Flow Over a Sphere at Re = 10,000,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 70(1), pp. 267–298. [CrossRef]
Ferziger, J. H. , and Peric, M. , 2001, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin.
Deville, M. O. , Fischer, P. F. , and Mund, E. H. , 2002, High-Order Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flow, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Pope, S. B. , 2000, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Achenbach, E. , 1974, “ Vortex Shedding From Spheres,” J. Fluid Mech., 62(2), pp. 209–221. [CrossRef]
Taneda, S. , 1978, “ Visual Observations of the Flow Past a Sphere at Reynolds Numbers Between 104 and 106,” J. Fluid Mech., 85(1), pp. 187–192. [CrossRef]
Merzari, E. , Pointer, W. D. , and Fischer, P. , 2013, “ Numerical Simulation and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition of the Flow in a Counter-Flow T-Junction,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(9), p. 091304. [CrossRef]
Makarashvili, V. , Merzari, E. , Obabko, A. , Fischer, P. , and Siegel, A. , 2016, “ Accelerating the High-Fidelity Simulation of Turbulence: Ensemble Averaging,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2016-7853.
Sagaut, P. , 2002, Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational domain comprising an extended, single-FCC unit cell geometry with a porosity of 0.42. (a) Volume rendering of the instantaneous velocity magnitude illustrating the fluid domain with sectioned cutaway of −1 ≤ y ≤ 0 and 0 ≤ z ≤ 1. Flow is in the positive z-direction. (b) Position of the [x, 0, z] and [0, y, z] lateral planes in the domain.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Interpolation line and point probe locations and naming convention

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Section of the spectral-element mesh after subdiscretization, illustrating the area of minimum interpebble spacing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Planar view of the Pyy component of the TKE production tensor for the [0, y, z] plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized power spectrum for the velocity time history at the C (top) and TRX (bottom) probe point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Temporal autocorrelation function for the fluctuating velocity time history at the TRX probe point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Velocity (top) and covariance (bottom) profiles extracted at times f(t) = 294 FTT and f(t + τ) = 300 FTT for the 9th-degree data set

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Profiles of the z-component of the velocity for the 7th-, 9th-, and 13th-degree cases: (a) TLX and TRX interpolation lines and (b) BLX and BRX interpolation lines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Profiles of the z-component of the covariance tensor for the 7th-, 9th-, and 13th-degree cases: (a) TLX and TRX interpolation lines and (b) BLX and BRX interpolation lines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Line profiles of the z-velocity component plotted for different lengths of time-integration: (a) velocity component 〈Uz〉, for line CX1 and (b) velocity component 〈Uz〉, for line CY1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Line profiles of the in-plane covariance components plotted for different lengths of time-integration: (a) covariance component 〈uxuz〉, for line CX1 and (b) covariance component 〈uyuz〉, for line CY1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Evolution of the z-velocity (streamwise) components, averaged per 64 (top) and 128 (bottom) FTT, respectively, at four time probe locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Vector fields of the most energetic eigenmode in the domain for two time sequences separated by a long time-integration period. (a) and (b) Transverse and lateral views of the central pebble gap area for sequence one, respectively. (c) and (d) The same for sequence 2. Black lines are overlaid to highlight relevant behavior. (a) POD sequence 1, [x, y, 0] transverse plane, (b) POD sequence 1, [x, 0, z] lateral plane, (c) POD sequence 2, [x, y, 0] transverse plane, and (d) POD sequence 2, [0, y, z] lateral plane.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Pseudocolor rendering of the ensemble-averaged velocity magnitude in the [x, 0, z] plane for the expanded domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Line profiles of ensemble-averaged data in the expanded computational domain. Line locations are shown in Fig. 14. (a) Velocity component 〈Uz〉 and (b) covariance component 〈uxuz〉.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In