Research Papers: Techniques and Procedures

Uncertainty Evaluation of Friction Velocity Measurements by Oil-Film Interferometry

[+] Author and Article Information
René Thibault

Civil Engineering Department,
Université de Moncton,
Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9, Canada
e-mail: rene.thibault@umoncton.ca

Gérard J. Poitras

Civil Engineering Department,
Université de Moncton,
Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9, Canada
e-mail: gerard.poitras@umoncton.ca

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 26, 2016; final manuscript received November 14, 2016; published online March 14, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Mark R. Duignan.

J. Fluids Eng 139(5), 051401 (Mar 14, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1480; doi: 10.1115/1.4035461 History: Received July 26, 2016; Revised November 14, 2016

Wind loads on structures and the wind environment around buildings are based on tests in boundary layer wind tunnels with corresponding scale parameters. The lower part of the troposphere boundary layer was simulated inside a small wind tunnel located at the Wind Engineering Centre of the Université de Moncton. The correct scale ratios of the boundary layer thickness combined with the roughness height are two of the most important scales to match. For small wind tunnels, roughness parameters related to the model boundary layer can be difficult to measure since scale ratios for wind load studies are expected to be in the range of 400–1000. Oil-film interferometry was used to determine the roughness parameters (shear stress, friction velocity, and roughness height) of the forced turbulent boundary layer inside the wind tunnel. In this work, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Guide to Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements was used to evaluate the standard uncertainty of the roughness parameters on the bottom wall of the wind tunnel. The standard uncertainty of the roughness parameters depends strongly on the oil viscosity and on the accurate measurement of the fringe spacing. Results show that the standard uncertainty of the shear stress and friction velocity determined by the interferometry technique can be less than 5% when the oil viscosity and the fringe spacing can be accurately measured with a standard uncertainty lower than 4% and 1%, respectively.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Davenport, A. G. , 1963, “ The Relationship of Wind Structure to Wind Loading,” Proceedings of a Symposium in Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Davenport, A. G. , 1967, “ The Dependence of Wind Loads on Meteorological Parameters,” Proceedings of a Symposium in Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, University of Toronto, Ottawa, Canada, Vol. 1, pp. 20–82.
Davenport, A. , Grimmond, S. , Oke, T. , and Wieringa, J. , 2000, “ The Revised Davenport Roughness Classification for Cities and Sheltered Country,” Third Symposium on the Urbain Environment, pp. 7–8.
Garratt, J. , 1992, The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Jensen, M. , 1958, The Model Law for Phenomena in the Natural Wind, Ingenioren (International Edition) ed., Vol. 2, Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Armitt, J. , and Counihan, J. , 1968, “ The Simulation of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer in a Wind Tunnel,” Atmospheric Environment, 2(1), pp. 49–71. [CrossRef]
Counihan, J. , 1969, “ An Improved Method of Simulating an Atmospheric Boundary Layer in a Wind Tunnel,” Atmospheric Environment, 3(2), pp. 197–214. [CrossRef]
Counihan, J. , 1973, “ Simulation of an Adiabatic Urban Boundary Layer in a Wind Tunnel,” Atmospheric Environment, 77), pp. 673–689. [CrossRef]
Cermak, J. , and Arya, S. , 1970, “ Problems of Atmospheric Shear Flow and Their Laboratory Simulation,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1(1), pp. 40–60. [CrossRef]
Standen, N. , 1972, “ A Spire Array for Generating Thick Turbulent Shear Layers for Natural Wind Simulation in Wind Tunnels,” National Aeronautical Establishment, Ottawa, Canada, Technical Report No. LA-94.
Cook, N. , 1978, “ Wind-Tunnel Simulation of the Adiabatic Atmospheric Boundary Layer by Roughness, Barrier and Mixing-Device Methods,” J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics, 3(2–3), pp. 157–176. [CrossRef]
Wang, Z. , Plate, E. , Rau, M. , and Keiser, R. , 1996, “ Scale Effects in Wind Tunnel Modeling,” J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics, 61(2–3), pp. 113–130. [CrossRef]
Sutton, O. , 1953, Micrometeorology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fang, C. , 1992, “ Aerodynamic Roughness Length: Correlation With Roughness Elements,” J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics, 41(1), pp. 449–460. [CrossRef]
NBC-2010, 2010, National Building Code of Canada 2010, NRC/IRC.
Iyengar, A. , and Farell, C. , 2001, “ Experimental Issues in Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulations: Roughness Length and Integral Length Scale Determination,” J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics, 89(11–12), pp. 1059–1080. [CrossRef]
Tutu, N. , and Chevray, R. , 1975, “ Cross-Wire Anemometry in High Intensity Turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 71(4), pp. 785–800. [CrossRef]
Perry, A. , Lim, K. , and Henbest, S. , 1987, “ An Experimental Study of Turbulence Structure in Smooth- and Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 177, pp. 437–466. [CrossRef]
Acharya, M. , and Escudier, M. , 1985, “ Measurements of the Wall Shear Stress in Boundary Layers Flows,” Turbulent Shear Flows 4; Selected Papers From the Fourth International Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Acharya, M. , and Escudier, M. , 1987, “ Turbulent Flow Over Mesh Roughness,” Turbulent Shear Flows 5; Selected Papers From the Fifth International Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Petersen, R. , 1997, “ A Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Surface Surface Roughness Length at Industrial Facilities,” Atmospheric Environment, 31(1), pp. 45–57. [CrossRef]
Squire, L. , 1961, “ The Motion of a Thin Oil Sheet Under the Steady Boundary Layer on a Body,” J. Fluid Mech., 11(2), pp. 161–179. [CrossRef]
Tanner, L. , and Blows, L. , 1976, “ A Study of the Motion of Oil Films on Surfaces in Air Flow, With Application to the Measurement of Skin Friction,” J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 9(3), pp. 194–202. [CrossRef]
Tanner, L. , 1977, “ A Skin-Friction Meter, Using the Viscosity Balance Principle, Suitable for Use With Flat or Curved Metal Surfaces,” J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 10(3), pp. 278–284. [CrossRef]
Monson, D. , Mateer, G. , and Manter, F. , 1993, “ Boundary-Layer Transition and Global Skin Friction Measurements With an Oil-Fringe Imaging Technique,” Aerotech’93, Costa Mesa, CA, SAE Technical Paper No. 932550.
Seto, J. , and Hornung, H. , 1991, “ Internally Mounted Thin-Liquid-Film Skin-Friction Meter–Comparison With Floating Element Method With and Without Pressure Gradient,” AIAA Paper No. 91-0060.
Seto, J. , and Hornung, H. , 1993, “ Two-Dimensional Skin-Friction Measurement Utilizing a Compact Internally-Mounted Thin-Liquid-Film Skin-Friction Meter,” AIAA Paper No. 93-0180.
Naughton, J. , and Sheplak, M. , 2002, “ Modern Developments in Shear-Stress Measurement,” Prog. Aerospace Sci., 38(6–7), pp. 515–570. [CrossRef]
Zilliac, G. , 1996, “ Further Developments of the Fringe-Imaging Skin Friction Technique,” NASA Technical Report No. 110425.
Brown, J. , and Naughton, J. , 1999, “ The Thin Oil Film Equation,” NASA, Technical Report No. NASA/TM-1999-208767.
Naughton, J. , Robinson, J. , and Durgesh, V. , 2003, “ Oil-Film Interferometry Measurement of Skin Friction—Analysis Summary and Description of Matlab Program,” 20th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities, ICIASF’03, Aug. 25–29, pp. 169–178.
Naughton, J. , 2005, “ High-Quality Skin Friction Measurements in 2-D Flows Using Oil Film Interferometry,” 21st International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities, ICIASF'05, Aug. 29–Sept. 1, pp. 166–175.
Irwin, H. , 1981, “ The Design of Spires for Wind Simulation,” J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics, 7(3), pp. 361–366. [CrossRef]
Gartshore, L. , and De Croos, K. , 1977, “ Roughness Element Geometry Required for Wind Tunnel Simulations of the Atmospheric Wind,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 99(3), pp. 480–485. [CrossRef]
Born, M. , and Wolf, M. , 1999, Principles of Optics, 7th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Driver, D. M. , 2003, “ Application of Oil-Film Interferometry Skin-Friction Measurement to Large Wind Tunnels,” Exp. Fluids, 34(6), pp. 717–725. [CrossRef]
Ng, H. C. H. , Marusic, I. , Monty, J. P. , Hutchins, N. , and Chong, M. , 2007, “ Oil Film Interferometry in High Reynolds Number Turbulent Boundary Layers,” 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, pp. 807–814.
Pailhas, G. , Barricau, P. , and Touvet, Y. , 2009, “ Friction Measurement in Zero and Adverse Pressure Gradient Boundary Layer Using Oil Droplet Interferometric Method,” Exp. Fluids, 47(2), pp. 195–207. [CrossRef]
Murphy, J. , and Westphal, R. , 1986, “ The Laser Interferometer Skin-Friction Meter: A Numerical and Experimental Study,” J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 19(9), pp. 774–751. [CrossRef]
ISO-JCGM100, 2008, Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. JCGM.
Corning, D. , 2000, “ Product Information—50cs, 100cs, 200cs, 350cs, 500cs, 1000cs,” Ref. No. 25-991B-01.
Khodier, S. A. , 2002, “ Refractive Index of Standar Oils as a Function of Wavelength and Temperature,” Optics Laser Technol., 34(2), pp. 125–128. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Wind tunnel configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Measured velocity profile and turbulence intensity compared with the requirements of a type A wind velocity profile from NBC-2010

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normalized velocity von Kármán power spectrum at Ys = 200 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Velocity profile linearization (R = 0.996)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Oil control volume [28] (Copyright 2002. Reproduced with Permission from Elsevier, New York)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fringe interference principles: (a) constructive interference producing white stripes and (b) destructive interference producing black stripes [28] (Copyright 2002. Reproduced with Permission from Elsevier, New York)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Interferometry technique configuration aligned with a monochromatic LED

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Diagram depicting the analysis line for the interferometry technique for t = 570 s and a viscosity ν = 100 cS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Analysis phase of an interferogram: (a) intensity along the analysis line; (b) FFT modulus on the signal of figure (a); (c) signal used for cross-correlation; (d) cross-correlation results between figures (a) and (c); and (e) height of oil at the surface




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In