0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

# Self-Similarity Analysis of Turbulent Wake Flows

[+] Author and Article Information
Tie Wei

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology,
Socorro, NM 87801
e-mail: tie.wei@nmt.edu

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 8, 2016; final manuscript received December 1, 2016; published online March 16, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Oleg Schilling.

J. Fluids Eng 139(5), 051203 (Mar 16, 2017) (6 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1223; doi: 10.1115/1.4035633 History: Received April 08, 2016; Revised December 01, 2016

## Abstract

This paper investigates the self-similarity properties in the far downstream of high Reynolds number turbulent wake flows. The growth rate of the wake layer width, $dδ/dx$; the decaying rate of the maximum velocity defect, $dUs/dx$; and the scaling for the maximum mean transverse (across the stream) velocity, Vmax, are derived directly from the self-similarity of the continuity equation and the mean momentum equation. The analytical predictions are validated with the experimental data. Using an approximation function for the mean axial flow, the self-similarity analysis yields approximate solutions for the mean transverse velocity, V, and the Reynolds shear stress, $T=−〈uv〉$. Close relations among the shapes of U, V, and T are revealed.

<>

## References

Townsend, A. A. , 1980, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Wygnanski, I. , Champagne, F. , and Marasli, B. , 1986, “ On the Large-Scale Structures in Two-Dimensional, Small-Deficit, Turbulent Wakes,” J. Fluid Mech., 168, pp. 31–71.
Pope, S. B. , 2000, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Wilcox, D. C. , 2006, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 3rd ed., DCW Industries, La Canada, CA.
George, W. K. , 1989, “ The Self-Preservation of Turbulent Flows and Its Relation to Initial Conditions and Coherent Structures,” Adv. Turbul., pp. 39–73.
Antonia, R. , and Mi, J. , 1998, “ Approach Towards Self-Preservation of Turbulent Cylinder and Screen Wakes,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 17(4), pp. 277–284.
George, W. K. , 2012, “ Asymptotic Effect of Initial and Upstream Conditions on Turbulence,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(6), p. 061203.
Schlichting, H. , and Gersten, K. , 2000, Boundary-Layer Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Sreenivasan, K. , 1981, “ Approach to Self-Preservation in Plane Turbulent Wakes,” AIAA J., 19(10), pp. 1365–1367.
Sreenivasan, K. R. , and Narasimha, R. , 1982, “ Equilibrium Parameters for Two-Dimensional Turbulent Wakes,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 104(2), pp. 167–169.
Ong, L. , and Wallace, J. , 1996, “ The Velocity Field of the Turbulent Very Near Wake of a Circular Cylinder,” Exp. Fluids, 20(6), pp. 441–453.
Ma, X. , Karamanos, G.-S. , and Karniadakis, G. , 2000, “ Dynamics and Low-Dimensionality of a Turbulent Near Wake,” J. Fluid Mech., 410, pp. 29–65.
Konstantinidis, E. , Balabani, S. , and Yianneskis, M. , 2005, “ Conditional Averaging of PIV Plane Wake Data Using a Cross-Correlation Approach,” Exp. Fluids, 39(1), pp. 38–47.
Yang, J. , Liu, M. , Wu, G. , Zhong, W. , and Zhang, X. , 2014, “ Numerical Study on Coherent Structure Behind a Circular Disk,” J. Fluids Struct., 51, pp. 172–188.
Gough, T. , and Hancock, P. , 1996, “ Low Reynolds Number Turbulent Near Wakes,” Advances in Turbulence VI, Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 445–448.
Hickey, J.-P. , 2012, “ Direct Simulation and Theoretical Study of Sub-and Supersonic Wakes,” Ph.D. thesis, Royal Military College of Canada, Ontario, Canada.
Liu, X. , 2001, “ A Study of Wake Development and Structure in Constant Pressure Gradients,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.

## Figures

Fig. 1

Schematic of a statistically two-dimensional stationary wake flow (statistics do not vary in the third, z−, direction). Thedominant direction of mean flow is in the axial direction, x, and the cross-stream coordinate is y. Mean velocity along thecenterline is denoted as Uc, where the velocity defect is maximum, Us=U∞−Uc. Wake half-width, δ=y0.5, is defined as U(y0.5)=U∞−0.5Us.

Fig. 2

Transverse distribution of the mean flow in the far-wake of turbulent wake flows. (a) The mean axial velocity defect profile, f≡(U∞−U)/Us. (b) Mean transverse velocity and Reynolds shear stress. Experimental data are from Ref. [2] (WCM), Ref. [16] (Hickey), Ref. [17] (Liu), Ref. [15] (GH at two downstream locations, x = 1 m and x = 0.58 m), and Ref. [11] (OW). Note that the Reynolds shear stress should be antisymmetric. GH (x = 0.58 m) data at positive y agree well with the two other data, but not in the negative y.

Fig. 3

The mean axial velocity defect, f, along with curves of Gaussian function e−aη2. Curves with three different constants a=0.6,0.7,0.8 are plotted. The curve with a = 0.7 seems to fit the data better.

Fig. 4

Experimental data of g/(ηf). The difference between the values at x=0.34 m, and the rest is attributed to the near-wake effect.

Fig. 5

Scaling of the maximum mean transverse velocity, Vmax, in the far downstream of turbulent wake flow

Fig. 6

Approximation function for the mean transverse velocity, g=V/Vmax≈−2ηe−aη2

Fig. 7

Approximation function for the Reynolds shear stress, h=T/Us2≈0.092ηe−aη2

Fig. 8

(a) Relation between V and U. Solid symbols are data of V/Vmax, and open symbols are data of −2ηf. (b) Relation between T and U. Solid symbols are data of T/Us2, open symbols 0.092ηf. (c) Relation between T and V. Solid symbols are data of −T/Us2 and open symbols (V/Us)(U∞/Us).

## Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

### Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related Proceedings Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections