0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Particle Image Velocimetry Investigation of the Leakage Flow Through Clearance Gaps in Cambered Hydrofoils

[+] Author and Article Information
Sailesh Chitrakar

Department of Energy and Process Engineering,
Norwegian University of
Science and Technology,
Trondheim 7491, Norway
e-mail: sailesh.chitrakar@ntnu.no

Hari Prasad Neopane

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Kathmandu University,
Kavre 45200, Nepal
e-mail: hari@ku.edu.np

Ole Gunnar Dahlhaug

Department of Energy and Process Engineering,
Norwegian University of
Science and Technology,
Trondheim 7491, Norway
e-mail: ole.g.dahlhaug@ntnu.no

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 6, 2016; final manuscript received March 6, 2017; published online June 7, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Hui Hu.

J. Fluids Eng 139(9), 091201 (Jun 07, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1802; doi: 10.1115/1.4036269 History: Received December 06, 2016; Revised March 06, 2017

In Francis turbines, which are normally designed at a reaction ratio of 0.5, the available pressure energy in the fluid is converted into 50% kinetic energy before entering the runner. This causes high acceleration of the flow in guide vanes (GVs), which adds to the unsteadiness and losses in the turbine. In sediment-affected power plants, the hard sand particles erode and gradually increase the clearance gap between the GV and facing plates, which causes more disturbances in downstream turbine components. This study focuses on investigating the flow through the clearance gap of the GV with cambered hydrofoil shapes by using particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique. The measurements are carried out in one GV cascade rig, which produces similar velocity fields around a GV, as compared to the real turbine. The investigation is done in two cases of cambered GV National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) profiles, and the comparison of the velocity and pressure distribution around the hydrofoil is done with the results in symmetric profile studied earlier. It is seen that the pressure distribution around the hydrofoil affects the velocity field, leakage flow, and characteristics of the vortex filament developed inside the cascade. NACA4412, which has flatter suction side (SS) than NACA2412 and NACA0012, is seen to have smaller pressure difference between the two adjacent sides of the vane. The flow inside the clearance gap of NACA2412 enforces change in the flow angle, which forms a vortex filament with a rotational component. This vortex along with improper stagnation angle could have greater consequences in the erosion of the runner inlet (RIn) and more losses of the turbine.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Marks of the horseshoe vortex on facing plate, (b) erosion at GV ends, and (c) erosion at the runner inlet [1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Orientation of GVs and velocity and pressure distribution and (b) vorticity along GV span in one GV rig [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Description of the GV test specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental layout in the lab

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Arrangement of pressure measurement through back cover plate of the test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

PIV measurement planes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Position of vectors and circumferential location corresponding to the real turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pressure distribution around GVs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Average velocity contour in the clearance gap and midspan planes for: (a) NACA2412, (b) NACA4412, and (c) NACA0012 hydrofoils

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Velocity normal to chord length, Vy inside clearance gap

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Velocity vectors above the clearance gap

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Average velocity at planes normal to chord from GV TE

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Contours of the angle (α) at the planes of GV outlet and runner inlet

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In