0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Particle Image Velocimetry Investigation of the Leakage Flow Through Clearance Gaps in Cambered Hydrofoils

[+] Author and Article Information
Sailesh Chitrakar

Department of Energy and Process Engineering,
Norwegian University of
Science and Technology,
Trondheim 7491, Norway
e-mail: sailesh.chitrakar@ntnu.no

Hari Prasad Neopane

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Kathmandu University,
Kavre 45200, Nepal
e-mail: hari@ku.edu.np

Ole Gunnar Dahlhaug

Department of Energy and Process Engineering,
Norwegian University of
Science and Technology,
Trondheim 7491, Norway
e-mail: ole.g.dahlhaug@ntnu.no

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 6, 2016; final manuscript received March 6, 2017; published online June 7, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Hui Hu.

J. Fluids Eng 139(9), 091201 (Jun 07, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1802; doi: 10.1115/1.4036269 History: Received December 06, 2016; Revised March 06, 2017

In Francis turbines, which are normally designed at a reaction ratio of 0.5, the available pressure energy in the fluid is converted into 50% kinetic energy before entering the runner. This causes high acceleration of the flow in guide vanes (GVs), which adds to the unsteadiness and losses in the turbine. In sediment-affected power plants, the hard sand particles erode and gradually increase the clearance gap between the GV and facing plates, which causes more disturbances in downstream turbine components. This study focuses on investigating the flow through the clearance gap of the GV with cambered hydrofoil shapes by using particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique. The measurements are carried out in one GV cascade rig, which produces similar velocity fields around a GV, as compared to the real turbine. The investigation is done in two cases of cambered GV National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) profiles, and the comparison of the velocity and pressure distribution around the hydrofoil is done with the results in symmetric profile studied earlier. It is seen that the pressure distribution around the hydrofoil affects the velocity field, leakage flow, and characteristics of the vortex filament developed inside the cascade. NACA4412, which has flatter suction side (SS) than NACA2412 and NACA0012, is seen to have smaller pressure difference between the two adjacent sides of the vane. The flow inside the clearance gap of NACA2412 enforces change in the flow angle, which forms a vortex filament with a rotational component. This vortex along with improper stagnation angle could have greater consequences in the erosion of the runner inlet (RIn) and more losses of the turbine.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Neopane, H. P. , Dahlhaug, O. G. , and Cervantes, M. , 2012, “ The Effect of Sediment Characteristics for Predicting Erosion on Francis Turbines Blades,” Int. J. Hydropower Dams, 19(1), pp. 79–83.
Brekke, H. , 1988, “ The Influence From the Guide Vane Clearance Gap on Efficiency and Scale Effect for Francis Turbines,” 14th IAHR Symposium, Section on Hydraulic Machinery Equipment and Cavitation, Trondheim, Norway, June 20–23, pp. 825–837.
Milliman, J. D. , and Meade, R. H. , 1983, “ World-Wide Delivery of River Sediments to the Oceans,” J. Geol., 91(1), pp. 1–21. [CrossRef]
Thapa, B. , 2004, “ Sand Erosion in Hydraulic Machinery,” Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Padhy, M. K. , and Saini, R. , 2007, “ A Review on Silt Erosion in Hydro Turbines,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 12(7), pp. 1974–1987. [CrossRef]
Thapa, B. S. , Dahlhaug, O. G. , and Thapa, B. , 2014, “ Sediment Erosion in Hydro Turbines and Its Effect on the Flow Around Guide Vanes of Francis Turbine,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 49, pp. 1100–1113. [CrossRef]
Thapa, B. S. , Thapa, B. , Eltvik, M. , Gjosater, K. , and Dahlhaug, O. G. , 2012, “ Optimizing Runner Blade Profile of Francis Turbine to Minimize Sediment Erosion,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 15(Part 3), p. 032052.
Koirala, R. , Thapa, B. , Neopane, H. P. , Zhu, B. , and Chhetry, B. , 2016, “ Sediment Erosion in Guide Vanes of Francis Turbine: A Case Study of Kaligandaki Hydropower Plant, Nepal,” Wear, 362–363, pp. 53–60. [CrossRef]
Brekke, H. , Wu, Y. , and Cai, B. Y. , 2002, “ Design of Hydraulic Machinery Working in Sand Laden Water,” Abrasive Erosion and Corrosion of Hydraulic Machinery, Imperial College Press, London, pp. 155–233.
Koirala, R. , Thapa, B. , Neopane, H. P. , and Zhu, B. , 2016, “ A Review on Flow and Sediment Erosion in Guide Vanes of Francis Turbines,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., (epub).
Chitrakar, S. , Neopane, H. P. , and Dahlhaug, O. G. , 2016, “ Study of the Simultaneous Effects of Secondary Flow and Sediment Erosion in Francis Turbines,” Renewable Energy, 97, pp. 881–891. [CrossRef]
Ciocan, G. D. , and Iliescu, M. S. , 2012, “ PIV Measurements Applied to Hydraulic Machinery: Cavitating and Cavitation-Free Flows,” The Particle Image Velocimetry—Characteristics, Limits and Possible Applications, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia.
Dular, M. , Bachert, R. , Stoffel, B. , and Sirok, B. , 2005, “ Experimental Evaluation of Numerical Simulation of Cavitating Flow Around Hydrofoil,” Eur. J. Mech., B: Fluids, 24(4), pp. 522–538. [CrossRef]
von Ellenrieder, K. D. , and Pothos, S. , 2008, “ PIV Measurements of the Asymmetric Wake of a Two Dimensional Heaving Hydrofoil,” Exp. Fluids, 44(5), pp. 733–745. [CrossRef]
Dreyer, M. , Decaix, J. , Münch-Alligné, C. , and Farhat, M. , 2014, “ Mind the Gap: A New Insight Into the Tip Leakage Vortex Using Stereo-PIV,” Exp. Fluids, 55(11), p. 1849.
Krane, M. H. , Meyer, R. S. , Weldon, M. J. , Elbing, B. , and DeVilbiss, D. W. , 2015, “ Measurements of Loading and Tip Vortex Due to High-Reynolds Number Flow Over a Rigid Lifting Surface,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 137(7), p. 071301. [CrossRef]
Oweis, G. F. , Fry, D. , Chesnakas, C. J. , Jessup, S. D. , and Ceccio, S. L. , 2006, “ Development of a Tip-Leakage Flow—Part 1: The Flow Over a Range of Reynolds Numbers,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 128(4), pp. 751–764. [CrossRef]
Thapa, B. S. , Trivedi, C. , and Dahlhaug, O. G. , 2016, “ Design and Development of Guide Vane Cascade for a Low Speed Number Francis Turbine,” J. Hydrodyn., Ser. B, 28(4), pp. 676–689. [CrossRef]
Thapa, B. S. , Dahlhaug, O. G. , and Thapa, B. , 2016, “ Velocity and Pressure Measurements in Guide Gane Clearance Gap of a Low Specific Speed Francis Turbine,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 49, p. 062019.
Thapa, B. S. , 2016, “ Effects of Sediment Erosion in Guide Vanes of Francis Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Chitrakar, S. , Thapa, B. S. , Dahlhaug, O. G. , and Neopane, H. P. , 2016, “ Numerical Investigation of the Flow Phenomena Around a Low Specific Speed Francis Turbine's Guide Vane Cascade,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 49, p. 062016.
Raffel, M. , Willert, C. E. , Werely, S. T. , and Kompenhans, J. , 2007, Particle Image Velocimetry—A Practical Guide, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin.
Ockfen, A. E. , and Matveev, K. I. , 2009, “ Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil Section With Flap in Extreme Ground Effect,” Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., 1(1), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Maddah, S. R. , and Brunn, H. H. , 2002, “ An Investigation of Flow Fields Over Multi-Element Aerofoils,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124(1), pp. 154–165. [CrossRef]
Thapa, B. S. , Dahlhaug, O. G. , and Thapa, B. , 2017, “ Sediment Erosion Induced Leakage Flow From Guide Vane Clearance Gap in a Low Specific Speed Francis Turbine,” Renewable Energy, 107, pp. 253–261. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

PIV measurement planes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Position of vectors and circumferential location corresponding to the real turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Arrangement of pressure measurement through back cover plate of the test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pressure distribution around GVs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental layout in the lab

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Description of the GV test specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Orientation of GVs and velocity and pressure distribution and (b) vorticity along GV span in one GV rig [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Marks of the horseshoe vortex on facing plate, (b) erosion at GV ends, and (c) erosion at the runner inlet [1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Average velocity contour in the clearance gap and midspan planes for: (a) NACA2412, (b) NACA4412, and (c) NACA0012 hydrofoils

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Velocity normal to chord length, Vy inside clearance gap

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Velocity vectors above the clearance gap

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Average velocity at planes normal to chord from GV TE

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Contours of the angle (α) at the planes of GV outlet and runner inlet

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In